have a war where the risk of growing insurgency will be all sorts of people who are victims of versailles and children are obviously one of the worst of the casualties the only solution to this is to say you war isn't working as there is absolutely no justification for nato forces to be there and that they should withdraw the troops this is now coming up to the tenth anniversary of the war and there is absolutely no question that this war is not getting better it is getting worse it is almost certain that whatever settlement eventually comes in afghanistan it will involve the taliban in some capacity nearly everybody now recognizes this so what is the point of continuing this war the point of continuing this war is because the americans and the british and their allies cannot admit defeat in the second country after what happened in iraq that is why they're there they're there in order to prop up a government that they have no real confidence in they are there in order to save their own faces they are there to protect their interests they're not there to protect the ordinary afghans and w

but four of versailles agreed there was too much tension and mistrust. but james earp said he thought there was pressure put on virgil by the townspeople that none of this would have occurred. i like virgil a lot and ended of feeling sorry for him. i think he tried to be the good lawman. in the eyes of the average 10 man the fight at the o.k. corral but it seems to me they were bumped into the background virgil wanted to be a lawman was very pragmatic and preferred to give people a chance to back away without in harassing them or have their pride intact. he did his best to let the cowboys settle down and cried out of town than finally felt he called on those he trusted most common his two brothers than there was also $0, they you would never miss an occasion like this. it was a terrible tragedy this happened if things had happened differently year virgil have not been approached, it is quiet and tom mclaury did not have their attempts and those walking through the okay corral meeting to leave town but not too fast because they didn't want the onlookers t

this is what she wore to the state dinner at versailles. the next part of the journey was even more important in terms of cold war politics. it was important enough to keep president they gaulle on our side but to go to the summit with khrushchev, president kennedy went to that summit meeting in summer of 1961. first time he met nikita khrushchev. he thought i am young, i am bright, i am dynamic and charismatic and that is how i won the presidency, i will be able to charm this communist russian peasant with no problem. one problem. he didn't. and khrushchev as the story goes, savaged the president to the deck of the president came out of the first summit meeting action faced. khrushchev took the measure of the man. mrs. kennedy on the other hand meeting at the same time with mrs. khrushchev and they are getting along famously. i am not here to argue that that saved the free world or save the from the bomb being dropped but if you have some personal diplomacy going on behind the scenes that certainly helped. here is another point i wish to r

prime minister, ladies and gentlemen, ministers, on june 22, 2009 in front of the congress in versailles, i was announcing that france was about to launch a large borrowing in order to finance investments for the future which it needed in order to guarantee future growth. we were facing the worst economic crisis the world had ever known for a century, and the response to this crisis was for all the governments of the world but it was not enough to prevent the collapse of our banks, collapse of our economies. it was even more urgent for the future and to give us the means to hold our rank in the world is going to come out of this crisis. and i'm wondering if all of us really appreciated the gravity of the crisis that the world had just gone through. i am very impressed to see the capacity for underestimating the strength of the crisis which the world went through. and i know that yesterday's news is old news, but this crisis was of a gravity which had no precedent. and a crisis told us that we should pursue reform and invest. the figures are eloquent. for the last 30 years france has neve

prime minister, ladies and gentlemen ministers, on june 22, 2009, in front of the congress in versailles, i was announcing that france is about to launch a plan in order to finance investment for the future which is needed in order to guarantee future growth. we were facing the worst economic crisis the world had ever known for a century, and the response to this crisis was mobilizing all the governments in the world, but it was not enough to prevent the collapse of our banks, the collapse of our economies. it was even more urgent for the future to give us the means to hold are ranked in the world and to combat the crisis. i was wondering if all of us really appreciated the gravity of the crisis that the world had just gone through. i know that yesterday's news is old news, but the crisis was of a gravity which has no -- a crisis told us that we should pursue reforms and invest. the figures are eloquent. for the last 30 years, france has never had a balanced budget. the deficit and the debt got worse and worse, and at the same time, the level of the administration's investment had never