it was veryife, interesting, i was working on a weapon system. it had legacy components and i had new components. what i also had were industry developer teams who worked with the program office to deliver this kind of capability to the government are. those development teams, more so than the government, but the brakes on new technologies. why did they do this? they did this because it was h,w, it was risky, oh, my gos i don't know how to do that. and it was wrong. there are two sets of obligations we have to look at in terms of innovation. it is less technology. mentioned atl was the security forum by senior nsa officials as a way of mitigating and moving forward from the damage caused by the events of last year. has been around, that standard since 2004. there have been more than adequate commercial tools available for integration that supports such access control mechanism since 2005-2006. it is not a matter of untested technology. it is more a matter of changing the acquisitions landscape. we need to do this in two ways. we must support our