vicary. >> i was shocked. i said, well, they've got the defense.cific ruling was, in large part, due to the objections raised by the new prosecutor leading the people's case. deputy da david koenn. >> the approach that the prosecutor took was to attack, at every -- at every turn and not give any free passes there. >> andrew wolfberg is a lawyer, today. back then, he was the youngest member of the menendez retry jury. >> this was a family that was win at all costs. the ends justify the means. to say that their parents had abused them was almost like the ends justified the means. let's make up this story about abuse. >> but one thing jurors figured was not made up was that confession tape. this time, the prosecution got to use that wildcard the way they wanted to, as their smoking gun. and they highlighted a section where the brothers seemed to have no remorse about what they had done. >> you miss just having these people around? >> i miss not having my dog around. >> that really just was like a punch in the gut. >> and then, just before the jury wen

it represented my mom living vicariously through me.represented something that my mom wanted that i didn't want. it was important for me to step away in a very definitive way and really just focus on completely -- completely on healing myself. >> reporter: reflecting back, jenette's critical of the hollywood machine and the world she was exposed to at such a young age. in her book she writes that after "sam and cat" was canceled, nickelodeon offered her a $300,000 thank you gift if she agreed to never speak publicly about her experience at the network. specifically with the man she refers to as "the creator" who on one occasion, she says, encouraged her to drink while she was still underage and gave her a shoemtd massage. in response nickelodeon telling abc news, "we have no reportable response other than a no comment at this time." >> i just said, no, it's not happening. that sounds like hush money to me. not doing it, not taking it. i do remember leaning against -- i think i talk about this in the book -- i lean against my bed, like,

it was also a vicarious war. it was intended to show russia the new russia. they couldn't go too far. the so viscous. i was mean of amiability authors, one i scenario niga, others vienna, illegal, staying out this year? we say no good. i'm here in the grocery, visio. oh, a national. he was lewinski scenarios, not as b with the talk of the psychiatry or say the one. yeah. don't school go doors. yeah. you know what i mean was not she is ashley cuz we're in the theater. e as in go yeah. that's not that cool. mm hm. after the collapse of the wall, so a treaty organization, nato expanded east, despite having promised not to. but they did. nato said ha, it's ours. we moved east international law exist as long as it serves american interest. if it doesn't, it doesn't exist. so truthfully, there's no such thing as international law. since the soviet union's collapse, the u. s. a has been surrounding new russia with a belt of hostile nations. mm. probably will swans in more of the common not the dot com tub. gus s own and then fall are not high, t on our price is kind

anybody a no nation, no nation has ever done anything like it in all the history with it was also a vicarious walk. it was intended to show russia the new russia that he couldn't go too far. the so his case i was mean of amy visibility across one i scenario yoga. others vienna illegal staying up this year? we say no good. i'm here in the grocery, visio. oh, a national you was lewinski scenarios, not be any with talk other psychiatry posted the one. yeah. don't school go doors. yeah. you know what i mean was not he is actually to swear in the theater he has in there go. yeah, that's not that cool. mm. hm, after the collapse of the wall. so treaty organization, nato expanded east, despite having promised not to. but they did. nato said ha, it's ours. we move east. international law exist as long as it serves the american interest. if it doesn't, it doesn't exist. so truthfully, there's no such thing as international law since the soviet union is collapse, the usa has been surrounding new russia with a belt of hostile nations pop liberal swans, and in order to come knock the stop at come tub gas

that is almost it was also a vicarious war. it was intended to show russia the new russia. they couldn't go too far the so this case i was mean of annual visibility or cost one. i scenario niga. others vienna illegal staying out this year? we say no good. i'm here in the grocery, visio. oh, a national, he was lewinski a scenario and last night as bna with talk of the psychiatry posted the one. yeah. don't school go doors. yeah. you know, you know, what i mean was not, he is actually cuz we're in the paper yet as in coyer tropical. mm hm. after the collapse of the wall. so treaty organization, nato expanded east, despite having promised not to them. but they did. nato said, ha, it's ours. we moved east international law exist as long as it serves american interest. if it doesn't, it doesn't exist. so, truthfully, there is no such thing as international law. since the soviet union is collapse, the usa has been surrounding new russia with a belt of hostile nations. probably will swans in more to the common, not the stop at come tub. gas is own home and then fall are not high o

and frankly, innocent soldiers who hadn't declared war any body a ah ah ah ah ah ah, it was also a vicarious war. it was intended to show russia the new russia. they couldn't go too far. the circus. i was mean of what amiability authorized. one i scenario niga, others. vienna you leave are staying up this year. we say no good. i'm here in the grocery, visio. oh, a national you was lewinski scenario and lets not us be any with talk other psychiatry or say the out on school go doors. yeah. you know what i mean was not v as actually go with any paper yet as in go u a tropical. mm hm. after the collapse of the wall, so a treaty organization, nato expanded east, despite having promised not to. but they did. nato said it's ours. we moved east international law exist as long as it serves american interest. if it doesn't, it doesn't exist. so truthfully, there's no such thing as international law. since the soviet union's collapse, the usa has been surrounding new russia with a belt of hostile nations. probably will swans in more to the common not being stopped at come tub. gas is own home and then

it was also a vicarious war. it was intended to show russia the new russia. we couldn't go too far the service cuz i was mean lever, amiability, artist, one i scenario, you google us, vienna, you leave the stana this year. we say no, but i'm here in the grocery, visio, or a national. you was lewinski scenario and last notice be any with the talk at the psychiatry. mostly the one. yeah. don't school go doors. yeah. you know, you know, what i mean was not v as ashley sweeney theater. here as in there, go, yeah. touch article. mm hm. after the collapse of the wall, so treaty organization, nato expanded east, despite having promised not to them. but they did. nato said it's ours. we moved east international law exists as long as it serves american interest. if it doesn't, it doesn't exist. so truthfully, there's no such thing as international law. since the soviet union is collapse, the usa has been surrounding new russia with a belt of hostile nations. probably will swans and in order to come, knock the stop at come tub. gus is on the own skin, then fall are not

frankly, innocent soldiers who hadn't declared war anybody ah, ah, ah, ah ah, so this is also a vicarious war. it is intended to show russia the new russia that he couldn't go too far. the some excuse. i was mean of what amiability artist, one i scenario niga, others vienna, illegal, staying out this year. we say no, i'm here in the grocery, visio. well, a national, he was lewinski scenario and last night was bna with eat, talk of the psychiatry for say the one. yeah. don't school go doors. yeah. you know, you know what i mean was not, he is actually to swear in the paper. he has in go. yeah, tropical. mm hm. after the collapse of the wall. so treaty organization, nato expanded east, despite having promised not to them. but they did. nato said, ha, it's ours. we moved east international law exists as long as it serves american interest. if it doesn't, it doesn't exist. so, truthfully, there is no such thing as international law. since the soviet union is collapse, the usa has been surrounding new russia with a belt of hostile nations. probably will swans. and in order to come knock the in

it was also a vicarious war. it was intended to show russia the new russia that he couldn't go too far the so this case i was mean of what amiability author, ask one i scenario yoga, others vienna illegal staying up this year? we say no good. i'm here in the grocery, visio. oh, i national you was lewinski scenarios must not be any with talk of those because most of the one. yeah. don't school go doors. yeah. you know what i mean was not fee as ashley, cuz we're in the theater here as it go. yeah. but you're stuck with them after the collapse of the wall. so treaty organization, nato expanded east, despite having promised not to. but they did. nato said it's ours, we move east international law exist as long as it serves american interest. if it doesn't, it doesn't exist. so truthfully, there's no such thing as international law. since the soviet union is collapse, the usa has been surrounding new russia with a belt of hostile nations. probably will swans and in order to come knock the stop at come tub. gas is on

oh, grave on your car run, it must be it is also a vicarious walk. it was intended to show russia the new russia that he couldn't go too far. the sofa ski, so his name of amy will visibility. arthur asked one i scenario yoga others vienna you leave are staying at this. you say no good. i'm here in the grocery, visio. oh, a national you was lewinski scenario and lets not be any with the talk of the psychiatry or say the one. yeah. don't school go doors. yeah. you know what i mean was not v as ashley, cuz we're in the theater. yeah. as in coyer. tropical. mm hm. after the collapse of the wall, so a treaty organization, nato expanded east, despite having promised not to. but they did. nato said, ha, it's ours. we moved east international law exist as long as it serves american interest. if it doesn't, it doesn't exist. so, truthfully, there's no such thing as international law. since the soviet union's collapse, the u. s. a has been surrounding new russia with a belt of hostile nations. probably will swans in order to come knock the stop at come tub. gu

it was also a vicarious war, is intended to show russia the new russia that he couldn't go too far the so his case i was nina. what amiability, almost one i scenario niga others vienna you leave are staying on this. you know, i'm here in the grocery visio. oh, a national. he was lewinski a scenario and that's not as bna with the talk of the psychiatry or say the one. yeah. don't school go doors. yeah. you know what i mean was not v as ashley, cuz we're in the theater. he has in coyer tropical. mm hm. after the collapse of the wall, so a treaty organization, nato expanded east, despite having promised not to. but they did. nato said ha, it's ours. we moved east international law exist as long as it serves american interest. if it doesn't, it doesn't exist. so truthfully, there's no such thing as international law. since the soviet union's collapse, the usa has been surrounding new russia with a belt of hostile nations. probably will swans and in order to come knock the stop in at come tub, gas is on the own stand, then fall are not high on our price is in and took them in pressure lende

declared war to anybody ah, [000:00:00;00] for ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, a ah, with it was also a vicarious war. it was intended to show russia the new russia. we couldn't go too far the so let's get those mean over annual visibility, auto squan. i scenario yoga. others vienna. eva stana this year. we say no, but i'm here in the grocer, visio. well i national, he was lewinski scenarios must not be an issue with talk at the psychiatry posted the one. yeah. don't school go doors. yeah. you know what i mean was not he is actually to swear in the paper he has in there go. yeah, i cool. mm hm. after the collapse of the wall. so treaty organization, nato expanded east, despite having promised not to. but they did. nato said ha, it's ours. we moved east international law exists as long as it serves american interest. if it doesn't, it doesn't exist. so truthfully, there's no such thing as international law. since the soviet union is collapse, the usa has been surrounding new russia with a belt of hostile nations. probably will swans and in order to come knock the inch dot come tub gas is on the ow

according to nathan, you ask them when you finish to let them live next to the line with it was also a vicarious war. does intended to show russia the new russia that he couldn't go too far. the so his case i was name of what amiability, autodesk, one i scenario niga, others vienna, illegal staying at this. you know, i'm here in the grocery, visio. oh, a national. he was lewinski scenarios must not be an issue with the talk of the psychiatry posted the one. yeah. on school. good words. yeah. you know what i mean was not he is actually cuz we're in the theater. he has in there go yeah, tropical. mm hm. after the collapse of the wall, so treaty organization, nato expanded east, despite having promised not to. but they did. nato said ha, it's ours. we move east. international law exists as long as it serves american interest. if it doesn't, it doesn't exist. so truthfully, there is no such thing as international law. since the soviet union is collapse, the usa has been surrounding new russia with a belt of hostile nations. i'm probably will swans and in order to come knock the stop at come tub. gus

i wanted people to be invited into this vicarious episodic experience understanding what i think is oftennterintuitive people think about justice as you well know in this very binary way. they think about okay, you must mean a trial. there'll be a conviction or an acquittal and and then justice somehow is miraculously served. when we think about it in this notion of that binary way, we find ourselves in the cycle of thinking that the ends will justify the means and frankly. it's what happens in those means the in between the collateral damage that occurs and illustrate that the book the ways in which that concept of how can it be that you could create injustice by pursuing a conviction. i lead off the book talking about a very complicated notion where our immigration policy intersects with the law right the idea of being a nation of laws, but yet when i find out that a victim of a crime has an active deportation warrant, and i'm required because of the law to turn this person in and equate him with the person who is actually committed a crime again the idea of if i were just pursuing a co

so this is, this is sort of a vicarious way for nato to have tested itself to see how it could stand up to the doubt. sure ground that the russians are far more effective force than they ever imagined. and some of these weapons system, such as the javelin, and the other anti tank guided missiles that have been sent to the front. that they've not proved at all effective and halting the russians and stopping their advance. so i think this has been the really cold shower of both figuratively and literally for the, for the pm's nato. they've got to recognize that these weapons systems are they thought were going to be effective or not. pleasure to see you again. laurie, thanks for your time. today, former cia analysts on burg associates sio, laurie chilton says, you know, to our special continuing coverage on us chemist them one year on since the u. s. military withdrawal from the country the with of today, the taliban is marking 12 months since the withdrawal of the american forces with crowds taking to the streets of couple with guns and flags to celebrate the anniversary of the politi

and he cannot be held vicariously culpable under the law to the actions of his staff were auditors or lawyers. and he said the presidential records act, it is a measure of control, custody and possession and access. and of course these constitutional scholars in today's wall street journal article -- merrick garland knew all of that. and they tossed in several general statutes. and the records act, it takes precedence, it supersedes any general statutes. and merrick garland knew that, that he wanted to gain access to the compound of donald trump for an ulterior motive. maybe something related to the january 6 date. so he tossed out a general warrant and it requires it to be specific and this wasn't. and the guy never signed it, maybe he has some buyers remorse, perhaps that's why he wants to divulge the content, because maybe that shows misrepresentation and how a subpoena should have been used instead of a warrant. sean: thank you so much. it is pretty obvious that there trying to prevent donald trump from running for president again, and instead the new fishing expedition driving up

what type of vicarious trauma have you had? [laughter] >> as a sometimes i get off the bench and i felt like i was in a physical fight. i would physically feel like someone had put their hands on me. because every case that comes before a judge, this is why judges need to understand vicarious trauma that they experience every case is a different problem in different trauma that they are absorbingng from the person that comes before them. making decisions with the best amount of information that you have. hoping that when these folks leave nothing happens to them. hoping you call whatever it was that might help them. so you hear these stories again, and again, and again. you have to figure out a break away from them. if you understand your job is submission work it's hard because you don't leave it work yout can't. it is b impossible to leave and build i'm going to go play soccer or whatever it is you do. but you have to figure out and understand sometimes you are feeling something that's not even yours. it was the person you le

they get some kind of vicarious gratification of believing. no, they're walking behind a person who walks on water. i think it's showing that mr. trump know he's under the law that we fought a revolution to make the rule of law king, not the king law. and mr. trump is going to be held accountable. now, some of those who will still want to believe the geocentric theory and not the heliocentric theory of the universe will cling to him. but i think we'll find a peeling away of trumps supporters who see that this guy's got feet of clay and no, i don't want to back him any more. they can see the writing on the wall. can i ask you very quickly about those tax returns? presumably mr. trunk will be throwing as we speak, his ahmad are of very, very highly paid lawyers at that to make sure they never see the light of day. i think he clearly will lose. remember this panel the 3 judge panel were all republicans, these are conservative judges who ruled the way they did. and they almost scoffed at mr. trump's claim that he has an executive privilege. now it

no, of course not.th and he cannot be held vicariously culpable under the lawe for the actions of hit staff or auditors or their lawyers. but the important part, the point i made to the night of the raid is that the presidential records actre is the controlling statute. it givessi him a measure of control and custody and possession and access. and of course, these two constitutional scholars in today's "wall street journal" made the exact same point. merrick garland knew all of that. there's no enforcement provision under the records act. it's not a crime. so what did merrick garland do? he tossed in three general criminal statutes. well, wait a minute. under t law for more than 100 years in america, a specific statute like the records act takes precedent and supersedes any general statutes. and again, garland knew that, but he wantedd to gain access to trump's compound for an ulterior motive to look for some evidence, any evidence of a different crime, maybe something related to uy january six . so he tossed out a general a warrant, which is a clear violation of the fourth amendment,

presidents don't pack up their belongings, performed by law, by the gsa government agency, he is not vicariouslye to bring against trump. stuart: do you think we will see the details on that affidavit or will they keep it sealed? i'm guessing they keep it sealed, what say you? >> because the government seems to be dedicated to the proposition of hiding and sealing evidence, i agree with you. i don't think we are going to see them. the raid of a former president of the united states by his political opponent's administration, americans deserve the full truth, greater transparency. i don't by for a minute that the claim that this would jeopardize national security or compromise our ongoing investigation, you can redact portions of the affidavit. i suspect he is hiding it because the fbi has a history of wrongdoing when it comes to seeking warrants. did they deceive and withhold vital information from the magistrate who signed off on it. i am pretty suspicious of that they did. stuart: you make a good case that it is dangerously problematic. thanks for being you soon. a new poll shows -- i'm intere