no consequences. wolf, well, with the vice president of the center for china and globalization, victor gao and joining us live on our team to national great to see you. thank you so much for your time. very much for having me. thank you. happy new year and i thank you for joining us for this program live from moscow. we return in about 28 minutes. hope you can join us then i was just using was a oh to 6 to double up. still them as to what you know with brutal of get or you're finished with. she just did. it could also go straight up steel. are you still on the marker? but also what i experienced in somebody else and you posted, i love you. i will pop up then you will scramble. no, but it won't go up. it doesn't have to fall with. but it was a menu just from wells that there's like a gloss. maybe a little more school park where it was built in germany. i was still yeah, yes, you can do something and i got school. what are you and i would love you. good wasting job. yeah. then you'd yeah. well let me get me, geez. yeah. maybe i may look wash, go from video. daniel bosh with school. she has t

we heard from regional geopolitical expert, victor gao who says joint military exercises only escalate the already heightened tensions in the korean peninsula. and just like united states and our okay. also need to really think about why dpr k had to develop its nuclear weapons. i think dpr k concluded that it needed the nuclear weapon to prevent the color revolution that the united states has been doing to many other countries. to prevent a kind of military assault on dpr k aimed at over throughly the d p r k government. and therefore, i think it really takes the 2 to tango. the united states in particular and tpr k need to negotiate with each other resulting diplomacy to solve the nuclear weapons program on the korean peninsula. but now if the united states wants to join the military exercise with the r o k forces using nuclear weapons, in addition to strategic bombers, this is not helpful. you know, she may need no garage zation on the korean peninsula. u. s. house speaker nancy pelosi is leaving her role as speaker this year. the official made waves in 2022 with her controversial v

when we spoke to the vice president of the center for china and globalization, victor gao who says that re arming japan poses a danger to countries in the region. particularly when talk of nuclear weapons is involved it will be completely wrong for the united states to try to re lease the potential aggressive things of japan, which will be a curse to many countries in the asia pacific region. i would urge secretary law in austin to be very cautious when he uses any words involving on nuclear weapons. it is absolutely wrong for the country like the united states. talk about nuclear weapons, all using nuclear weapons against any country in the world. mankind does not need to have another nuclear. the united states used a nuclear bombs to bomb here. and i guess in 1945 and they have lots of contamination about the u. s. decision to use nuclear weapons, as well as the very end of the 2nd world war global south countries need a new type of globalization based on a quality that's the call from india's prime minister, may during a 2 day international online summit with over 120 nations in atte

the american government needs to get tough on beijing. victor gao, senior figure in a china based thing, time saith the establishment of the committee, is unlikely to make any difference as it won't halt, chinese development. whatever these politicians in washington want to do will end up in failure. no one can stop china's peaceful development. i won't even go further to say that any attempt to deprive the chinese people of their right of economic development will be the largest a crime against humanity. the united states need to really look at its own problems at home, rather than blaming china for its own failure. and by blaming china for its own failure will not solve the problems in the united states. you may actually push the united states into greater mistakes. it is time for the united states to recognise china is a global power to be treated as an equal rather than trying to hold and china down to the ground to men handle china as if there will be no consequences. ah, well, the u. s. is not only wrong with china, but also with it said, posted allies in europe. belgium has had a

let's get the take on all this with victor, gao, vice president of the center for china and globalization. think tank you're most welcome to the program. so this 4, star general says his gut instinct tells him, war with china is on the horizon. victor, what does your gut tell you? cut a war be ahead within 2 years. first of all, this general is a war monger and what he is saying and telling his troops is the very dangerous thing for world peace and stability. secondly, it's fortunate that the u. s pentagon has 2nd guest or this general saying whatever he sent, a does not represent the official position of the pentagon, and the u. s. government in general, has also denied that his general represents the official position of the united states, these army china. now secondly, i hope washington will realize that war is not and should not be an option between china and the united states. 2 countries armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons, because a war between china, the united states will soon get out of control and lead directly to armageddon. and eventually, to will not only be a disaster

we spoke to the vice president of the center for china and globalization. victor gao, he says that rearming japan poses a danger to countries in the region. but secondly, when talk of nuclear weapons is involved, it will be completely wrong for the dotted stays to try to re lease the potential aggressive things, things of japan, which will be a curse to many countries in the asia pacific region. i would urge secretary law in austin to be very cautious when he uses any words all comes involving a nuclear weapons. it is absolutely wrong for a big country like the united states. talk about nuclear weapons, all using nuclear weapons against any country in the world. mankind does not need to have another nuclear. the united states use the nuclear bombs to bomb your shipment. in 1945 and they have lots of contamination about the u. s. decision to use nuclear weapons was the very end of the 2nd world war. malaysia will look into banning palm all exports to the year. that's in response to the blocks recent legislation, making it more difficult for companies to sell the commodity to europe. if we ne

a diplomatic solution and deescalate vice president of the center for china and globalization. victor gao says that the u. s. rearming, japan would have serious consequences. first of all, the john state lou, 2 united states and japan is provocation. and is not justified by any stretch of the imagination. the united states re, is re army, japan. and this is against the constitute short on japan, which is for the a pacifist constitution. and this is very dangerous and this will really trigger a whole series of consequences. and at the same time, the united states is accusing other countries of sabotaging the so called a rule based the international order. so who is destroy and sabotage in the rule based order as established by the unconditional surrender of japan. in 1945, china is willing to spend is also a very small fraction of that, of the united states. so why should the united states accusing china of sabotaging, for example, peace and stability in our part of the world? i think the united states is scheming and scheming and scheming again. tried to grade to more trouble and tried to

to china. malaysian affairs expert, victor gao feels china poses little threat to the u. s. to deserve those comments by the general. this general is a wall monger and what he is saying and tele, his troops is very dangerous thing for world peace and stability. china does not threaten the united states at all. and if washington believes china threatens the united states because china is growing larger and larger, then they will lose all their sanity. because china will continue to grow. ready larger, i hope washington will realize that war is not and should not be an option between china and the united states. 2 countries armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons, because a wall between china, the united states will soon get out of control and lead directly to armageddon. and eventually, to will not only be a disaster for the united states and for china, but for mankind as a whole. i don't see these people dangerous as they are, represent the fundamental interest, all the people in the united states. why? because china and the united states need to get along with the, with eac

victor gao is vice president of the center for china and globalization. i spoke to him earlier.great tragedy. china right now is in a major transition from the pandemic zero covid policy which china practised for three years with huge spectacular successes in terms of minimising death and infections, to a new paradigms of living with covid just like the rest of the world. in this sense we are crossing through a wall of fire with much uncertainty and high risk and huge costs and the numbers of deaths for the past 3a days or so is really a huge cost to the chinese nation. it is a tragedy. 0n the other hand it is not surprising because even though the numbers themselves are huge and each death is a tragedy and i mourn each and all of these deaths, when you live with covid like the united states or britain or any other country in the world have been doing for the past three years, you have to bear the cost and deaths will very much be in that process. ijust hope we will be able to cross the wall of fire as soon as possible with a minimum amount of death. i think we are already past

it will never, never be another victor gao in that parish. look the church that chose the one.y just ostrich thing to do in. the diocese of in cornwall, in leicestershire, in lincolnshire and sheffield, in many dioceses around the country have been most. and if you do that, it's common sense that the ratio of clergy to people in the villages and suburbs and clans goes down and suburbs and clans goes down and so that breaks the link between church and community which is a tragedy to break that link. and what about but what about the idea that you are doing this poultry of money and doing this poultry of money and do you think they're doing something that would be order one or 2 million? is it gesture politics? are they posturing . politics? are they posturing. well, i prefer to stick to the term balance. ijust well, i prefer to stick to the term balance. i just challenge and save the parish as. our name suggests we just challenge the balance that's being demonstrated as to where the church of england's priorities really lie. in our book priority should be at the front the queue