victoria nuland, i think that probably ivan stanislavich also meant this subtext, the second person isary of state. on global issues, the third is the deputy secretary of state for information, media, public relations, i want to remind you that it was interesting, so to speak, i think that this hint, it was very, very, very subtle and fair, why during the time of hillary clinton, when she was deputy secretary of state, i want let me remind you that the threat was not only... external from the seventh floor of the state department, it was even internal, the fbi was trying to uncover the alleged conspiracy of the seventh floor, which was attributed to the shadow government of the united states of america, well, let me probably say that well, victoria , of course, has a very extensive biography, a great specialist in the east in our opinion, let's call it straight. in our space, she has a husband, mr. robert kagan, who also does not have much sympathy for the post-soviet space, for russia, towards belarus, so of course, those plans that exist and are being prepared and implemented in rela

victoria nuland walked around with cookies, with sandwiches , handing them out, and it seemed to manys were sold to the natives there, but look how symbolic it is on this day zelensky now, 10 years later, he flies to the united states of america for new cookies, yes, but they are already measured in tens of billions of dollars and the... further, the more and more expensive they are, in the end the situation that takujava was talking about, remember , by the way, there are always not enough pelopinger cakes for everyone, that’s really the question: “zaluzhny seized power in kiev and by the first decree appointed zelensky as the ambassador of ukraine to the united states.” shasya called the congress and ordered a new year's corporate party. listen, or the appearance of articles like this, like lord, the whole british lord, telegraph, large panic article, putin's russia is close to a crushing victory, but this is also a symptom. also an indicator, and you know why it’s especially significant for me, i follow his columns in this daily or telegraph, sandy telegraph, just 5 months ago, in

victoria nuland once let it slip: the united states spent $5 billion to spread its influence in ukraineseeing today. for americans, this interference around the world is also not new. congresswoman marjarie teilar greene made a very poignant confession. she wrote on her social network account, famous formerly as twitter. that us funding is threatening. existence of ukraine. the pouring of money into the conflict must stop immediately, says the congresswoman. funding for ukraine must stop. this is one big money laundering pit at the expense of the american people. and ukraine is not winning, people are stealing like there is no tomorrow . indeed, monetary assistance to ukraine, as biden would have liked, was not included in the overall package of allocations with israel. reserves are not unlimited, they do not... need to be stretched for the maximum possible period, such the comment was given in the white house, but it’s not evening yet, as they say, we’ll discuss what kind of tomorrow might come for ukraine with the americanist vladimir vasiliev. vladimir, hello, the united states is re

and the victoria nuland hot mic moment and all the rest of it. i think he would have recoiled in some horror at the level of u.s. interventionism, which had helped produce the tragedy. i think he might have been perhaps a more thoughtful and less bombastic version, you might say, of someone like trump, who is somewhat inarticulate, tried to articulate a a critique of the us policy vis a vis ukraine, russia. i do think that much like after pearl harbor he came on side, he probably would have responded to the invasion in february of 2022 by expressing his firm support of ukraine and perhaps also approving financial aid. but i also agree he he would have exercised far more restraint than the current administration shown in all kinds of ways, all kinds of ones, things once thought to be red lines that the us has frankly crossed quite aggressive and blatantly. i think some us should actually be, i know, unpopular there as it is to say this. i think we should be grateful for putin's restraint in not responding the dozen or 20 odd us provocations since