my own field is a victorian fiction. it's a great parallel -- parable about that. the mean character. working on an impossibly lengthy autograph don't you know that germans actually they have done all of that already. and there is a way in which that it does mitigate against reputation in the field. there is a struck claim. for a new contribution to knowledge. when i see. reviews of the main thing i tend to look for i want to see the reviewer provide a summary of the book's argument. that shows that there was an attempt to read that manuscript with sympathy. if they only concentrate on details that to me as the sign that it was not read while it was red with some sub training. it should be able to suggest the limits of that argument the first thing i look for. i want to to mirror back to me. there are times when we have to read between the lines. they would sing the praise. you don't want to see that groundbreaking original scholarship. but you can kind of get at it that way. you do learned to read a lexicon of terms. you can tell. and eric from your point of view