they did it by videoconference. that was wholly inadequate.ven then it appears that alex nix's testimony may have been untrue vis-a-vie the facebook data. we need to find out. it's certainly inconsistent with what we're seeing from this whistleblower. >> i want to know whether what you think facebook has said in regard to all of this is a helpful matter or shoots themselves in the foot. let me quote facebook's statement. the claim that this is a data breach is false. people knowingly provided their information. no systems were infiltrated, no passwords or sensitive pieces of information were stolen or hacked. how doeshat sit with you? >> i don't know whether it's better or worse that the private data of 50 million americans may have been inappropriately used and that wasn't a breach. that may be a worse problem. but cambridge analytica had facebook people embedded within its operation. did these people know where cambridge analytica had acquired the data. these are very important questions that we need to get answers to, and i don't think we'r