the general manager has the staff look at this and maybe the environmental commissioner president vietor have staff look at this what it means if it looks like it causes serious problems let's get an item on the agenda and deal with it to the state we don't want this to be approved that's it thanks. >> could we get an update at the next meeting the implications of this merger on pg&e operations and we'll definitely look at this. >> is there any additional public comment? >> on the general manager report or commission comments we'll take a quick 5 minute break and return a >> okay. we're resuming the san francisco public utilities commission meeting and we're moving to the consent calendar item 10 can you please read the items mr. commission secretary and item 10 consent calendar commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests in which event the matter shall be removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. a approve terms and conditions and authorize a 5 years la

. >> commissioner president vietor and commissioners cfo for the puc i have the next installment in your yearlong effort to look at the recommendations we have with respect to them so today, we're talking about the technology policy it was so adopted in september of 2012 and it really establishes four areas by principles and criteria by which to consider that adopt and implement the technology there are 4 basic areas the first relates to economic consideration essentially this is making sure there is a solid business case for the deployment of technology and very little impact for example, you're looking mobile field technology that allows field forces to operate for efficiently and drive less and reduce the green house gas emissions that is a very well impact and the social and workforce development how it aligns with the policy or staff development opportunities and finally leadership and transparency and that really is oriented towards conducting pilots and making sure there is democr democratab demonstrable technology - the puc is responsible for the technology and the various projec

best way to go i'll encourage you to do that as far as i know i believe that commissioner president vietoras talking about the worries that is great forward thinking think about them full fledge of power but for some reason their cca customers you know you're staff is extremely intelligent they'll make the financing work they'll figure out how to come back with a proposal it might mean making a proposal but you're staff a will talented and will come back with a changes a very good opportunity and might be there is a really good, opportunity with construction that fell into their laptops we can't pass this it is cheaper and there is some new incentive that will dry up and they'll come back make sure you're moving the package forward today to have a program to have those discusses in the future and one over 6 years working on this the frustration at times not gordon's anytime you've had a question the only time this commission go said put the brakes on this and you're staff stopped work an cca that's the original time had they - they talked with the staff and pretty sure this report was thin

. >> >> roll call vote commissioner president vietor commissioner courtney commissioner caen is on herpproval of the minutes pr the approval of the minutes of the november 10, 2015. >> so motio

. >> >> roll call vote commissioner president vietor commissioner courtney commissioner caen is on her way the approval of the minutes pr the approval of the minutes of the november 10, 2015. >> so motion to approve the minutes. >> second any questions any public comment on the minutes >> all in favor, say i. >> i. >> opposed? that motion carries next item. >> is general public comment under any public comments on matters that are currently not on the agenda today. >> hearing none next item, please. >> >> item 5 communications. >> you have before you all the communications that have been forwarded which you've had a chance to review any questions or comments on the communications commission? >> any public comment on communications? hearing next item, please >> item 6 other commission business 6 a authorize the general manager for a new recognize program for excellent 0 performances for the public utilities commission we the puc and contractor and consultant and/or other audit partners and ms. ellis. >> i'm julia i was the resolution before you authorizes. >> a new recognize program to

. >> commissioner president vietor and commissioners cfo for the puc i have the next installment in your yearlong effort to look at the recommendations we have with respect to them so today, we're talking about the technology policy it was so adopted in september of 2012 and it really establishes four areas by principles and criteria by which to consider that adopt and implement the technology there are 4 basic areas the first relates to economic consideration essentially this is making sure there is a solid business case for the deployment of technology and very little impact for example, you're looking mobile field technology that allows field forces to operate for efficiently and drive less and reduce the green house gas emissions that is a very well impact and the social and workforce development how it aligns with the policy or staff development opportunities and finally leadership and transparency and that really is oriented towards conducting pilots and making sure there is democr democratab demonstrable technology - the puc is responsible for the technology and the various projec

. >> commissioner president vietor and commissioners cfo for the puc i have the next installment in your yearlong effort to look at the recommendations we have with respect to them so today, we're talking about the technology policy it was so adopted in september of 2012 and it really establishes four areas by principles and criteria by which to consider that adopt and implement the technology there are 4 basic areas the first relates to economic consideration essentially this is making sure there is a solid business case for the deployment of technology and very little impact for example, you're looking mobile field technology that allows field forces to operate for efficiently and drive less and reduce the green house gas emissions that is a very well impact and the social and workforce development how it aligns with the policy or staff development opportunities and finally leadership and transparency and that really is oriented towards conducting pilots and making sure there is democr democratab demonstrable technology - the puc is responsible for the technology and the various projec