or the legislation of china, they do not entail any obligations , and as a result, what viktor fedorovich yanukovyching, what was signed in budapest as a fixation of the nuclear disarmament of ukraine, has already lost its validity from the point of view of relevance and of course we can, and at the level of diplomacy we are hunting for china as a super-country and a super-state on planet earth, which is generally interested in peaceful coexistence, as a subject that can well, let's say join the initiative related to the initiatives of connected with the support of ukraine, but china still proceeds from its own pragmatic interests, and these pragmatic interests are precisely demonstrated in its political position, and verbal commitments or verbal declarations against who took which commitments , they did not turn us away from of russian armed aggression, borussia was the same country that also made certain commitments, and therefore there is no point in raising this issue in rhetoric, because it will most likely lead us to a deeper conflict or, let's say , the formation of a mood among the populatio