, you were the first to appear please answer first, thank you, although it seems to me that viktor yevhenovich should be the first, because he was a legislator in the past and he has this material for work. well, what you said about the separation of the church from the state is not only that the state the constitution of ukraine said this, and indeed this is a constitutional norm and it is also a european norm that prohibits the intervention of the state in precisely this kind of this kind of problem and uh and question but on the other hand we really have a war and uh uh me it seems that i would suggest a different lens in order to look at this problem, the problem of collaboration, in particular, the problem of passive or active assistance to the aggressor on the part of the ukrainian orthodox church, i would suggest looking at this individuals who commit crimes are not committed by religious structures. individuals are citizens of ukraine, regardless of that and it doesn’t matter who they are, whether they are metropolitans, patriarchs, bishops, monks, etc. they are primarily citizens of u

appear, the first please answer, thank you, although it seems to me that the first should be viktor yevhenovichwas a legislator in the past and he owns this material , or the time will come. believe me, what you said about the separation of the church from the state is not only what the state said this is what the constitution of ukraine says , and indeed, it is a constitutional norm, and it is also a european norm, which prohibits the intervention of the state in precisely this kind of problem and issue, but on the other hand, we really have a war , and... it seems that i would like other optics i suggested that in order to look at this problem, the problem of collaboration, in particular, the problem of passive or active assistance to the aggressor on the part of the ukrainian orthodox church, i would suggest that we look at it individually, that crimes they are not committed by religious structures, they are committed by individuals, citizens of ukraine, no, regardless of that and it does not matter who they are, whether they are metropolitans or patriarchs, whether they are bishops, monks,

imposed a fine of uah 10,000 and viktor gaponchuk annulled this decision due to an alleged procedural violation of an administrative offense against investigator andrii yevhenovicht under the second part of article 123 of the code of administrative law, he used an administrative offense against the persons of the officer andrii yevgenovich , of bringing him to responsibility under the first part of article 130 of the code of administrative offenses administrative law violations with the participation of gaponchuk significantly reduced the sentence of volodymyr migas, who in 2016 drunkenly hit a 16-year-old lyceum student as a result of a road accident, the schoolboy received serious injuries, the driver tried to flee the scene of the accident, however, he soon collided with two more cars and had to stop . the court sentenced megas to four years in prison, however, the gaponchuk panel changed this decision to three years of probation at the same time, excluding the aggravating circumstance that migas committed the crime while intoxicated before the appeals court, then a large protest action took place viktor gaponchuk has a large family of judges and influential