and dear friends of viktor yushchenko communicated with president kuchma through lyovachkin, and thisone for... balances, it is obvious that shefir, when he came, as one of the president's greatest friends, he did not take this function in order to somehow balance there with bohdan with something else, and most likely zelenskyi trusted him the most as a friend, and that is why he talks about such issues as contacts with oligarchs, that is, some very sensitive, intimate for president zelenskyi issues, intimate in quotation marks, was decided by the chief minister, but the chief minister after the attempt, about which he is sure have already forgotten him he left, and in fact, i think this could not have been yermak’s decision, but it should have been a mutual decision between shefir and zelenskyi, because , well, this function simply disappeared during the war, but so are all these staff reshuffles, i’m sure, they were initiated and and controlled by yermak, and this is a very harmful construction for president zelenskyi, because he was and remains in yermak’s monopoly in terms of who

well, now oleg rybachuk, former head of the secretariat of president viktor yushchenko, former vice-primeister for the european integration of ukraine, and co-founder of the honest glory to ukraine movement, will work on the espresso tv channel, mr. oleg, congratulations, glory to the heroes, an extremely serious earthquake in office the president has a number of leading specialists in various positions with different biographies and different histories of relationships with volodymyr zelenskyi were removed from their positions, this case was preceded by the resignation of the secretary of the national security and defense council of ukraine oleksiy danilov, so some explanations were made there in connection with the transfer to a more, so to speak, suitable position, so as it turned out the head diplomat' representative office in moldova. well, actually, i don't perceive it at all as some kind of tsunami, it's something like that, a light spring breeze, shefir, trofimov, well, these are the people who led volodymyr oleksandrovich to the podiums of all olympians under the white hands. and

and viktor's dear friends yushchenko communicated with president kuchma through lyovachkin, and thise for balances, it is obvious that sefir, when he came, as one of the largest... president, he did not take this function in order to somehow balance there with bohdan or with something else , and most likely zelensky trusted him the most as a friend, and therefore such issues as contacts with oligarchs. there he talks about everyone, that is, some very sensitive, intimate issues for president zelenskyi, intimate in quotes, were resolved by the shefir, but the shefir left after that attempt, about which they probably already forgot about him, and in fact, i think this could have been the solution not yermaka, but this should have been a mutual decision of shefir and zelenskyi, because this function simply disappeared in the war, but all these personnel changes, i am sure, they initiated and it is controlled by yermak, and this is a very harmful construction for president zelenskyi, because he remains in yermak’s monopoly, as it was and remains, from the point of view of who he meets, w

well, now oleg hrybachuk, former head of president viktor yushchenko's secretariat, former vice primeister for european integration of ukraine, and co-founder of the chesna movement will work on the air of the tv channel. glory to ukraine, mr. oleg, congratulations. glory to heroes. extremely. a serious earthquake in the president's office, a number of leading specialists, in different positions, with different biographies, different histories of relations with volodymyr zelenskyi, were removed from their positions, this matter was preceded by the resignation of the secretary of the national security and defense council of ukraine oleksiy danilov, well, some explanations were given in connection with the transfer to a more, so to speak, suitable position, well... the head of the diplomatic mission in moldova, well, actually, i do not perceive it as some kind of tsunami at all, it is something like a light spring breeze, trofimov, well, these are the people who led volodymyr oleksandrovich under the white hands to the pedestals of all olympians, so when it happened, it was in the era b

viktor yushchenko, because i had two deputies there and that was all, but this position was given toeonid kuchma, where the first assistant was serhiy lyovachkin, who is still there. is in ukrainian politics, and bankova knows him well, he survived, and medvedchuk, who was there, well, the personification of evil, a bad policeman, a good policeman, for example, viktor yuchenko and dear friends of viktor yuchenko communicated with president kuchma through lyovachkin, and it was done for balance, it is obvious that shefir, when he came, as one of the president's biggest friends, he did not take this function in order to somehow balance there with bohdan or. something else, and most likely zelensky trusted him the most as a friend, and that is why he talks about such issues as contacts with oligarchs, that is, some very sensitive, intimate for president zelenskyi issues, intimate in quotation marks, were decided by the chief, but the chief after that attempt , about who probably already forgot about him, he left, and in fact, i think, this could not have been the decision of yermak, but

this line was continued by the third president of ukraine, viktor yushchenko.raine requested to join the action plan to prepare for nato membership. but at the summit in bucharest that same year, this issue was postponed. germany and france. in july 2010, power changed in ukraine. the verkhovna rada, at the suggestion of the new president, viktor yanukovych, adopts a law on non-bloc status. from all government documents, as well as from the law on the fundamentals of domestic foreign policy, words about the desire for nato membership were removed. all that remains is the annual cooperation program with the alliance, the participation of ukrainian aviation in the transportation of goods in kosovo, afghanistan and iraq. after the coup d'etat in 2014 , ukraine returned to the course of rapprochement with nato. in september 2015, a new edition was published. it is confirmed by president vladimir zelensky, elected in april 2019. after the start of a special military operation, the alliance countries provided ukraine with unprecedented financial and military assistan

this line was continued by the third president of ukraine, viktor yushchenko.nder him, ukraine asked to join the plan actions to prepare for nato membership. but at the summit in bucharest that same year, this issue was postponed. germany and france opposed it. in july 2010, power changed in ukraine. the verkhovna rada with the submission of the new president victor. yanukovych adopts a law on non-bloc status; words about striving for membership were removed from all government documents, as well as from the law on the fundamentals of internal foreign policy. to nato. all that remains is the annual cooperation program with the alliance, the participation of ukrainian aviation in the transportation of goods in kosovo, afghanistan and iraq. after the coup d'etat in 2014, ukraine is returning to a course of rapprochement with nato. in september 2015 , a new version of the military doctrine was published, in which the russian federation is named as a military adversary. in february 2019 , the verkhovna rada. approved amendments to the constitution that secured the

viktor yushchenko, co-founder of chesno movement. thank you.ime of our program has run out, stay with the spresso tv channel. my colleagues will inform you about all the most important events of this day. take care of yourself and your loved ones, see espresso. see you on air. greetings, today's story is about two girls and one boy who went missing. in the chaos of war at the beginning of a full-scale invasion of russia. all the children we will talk about are from the temporarily occupied part of the kherson region. these are snizhana almagambetova, georgy bursky and sofiyka vashchenko. snowyna is only 11 years old and nothing is known about her since february 24, 2022. a girl disappeared in the skadovsky district of the kherson region in the city of gola prystan. and just 20 years ago , this 15-year-old boy, his name was george burskyi, lived on a bare pier in the city of oleshki in the kherson region before the war. please look carefully, in his face the teenager is missing, and maybe you will recognize him and help him find him. just like s

be formed during the elections, well, you can say instantly, this happened at one time with viktor yushchenko, who, in fact, did not have a personal party at the time of nomination. presidents, but, well, more precisely, a candidate, when the parliamentary elections began, our ukraine took shape. literally as a union of 10 parties, the electoral list of our ukraine, yushchenko's election list, that is why it is so consolidated, consolidation scenarios around the figure of zaluzhnyi, they are quite probable, and above all, they are, well, i would say, lurking in the bowels of the ukrainian consciousness. yes, it is also an extremely important moment, but we understand that general zaluzhny still has a lot to overcome. various challenges, not only obstacles, challenges, both individual plan and institutional, yes, well, volodymyr tsybolko just mentioned the list of our ukraine, well, on the one hand, it was a powerful list, but on that list there were such characters that i don't even want to mention now, frankly speaking, that is , they are just people who caused, i 'll put it mildly, surprise

conversation, i want to remind our tv viewers that oleg rybachuk, former head of president viktor yushchenko'secretariat, co-founder of the movement, was currently working on espresso fair. thank you. the time of our program has run out, stay with the espresso tv channel. my colleagues will inform you about all the most important events of this day. take care of yourself and your loved ones. see espresso. see you on air. congratulations, mr. garland, and let's begin with the plot of your new film and the script. 19 states seceded. the united states army is ramping up the intensity. the white house warns both western powers and the florida alliance. the president, elected for a third term, promises to quickly put down the rebellion. want something try on? are you aware that there is a real civil war going on all over america? we... according to politics, judging by the news, this will be the best. civil war in the united states. many say that this is another one. however , the plot itself is superimposed on the fierce political struggle that we have all witnessed in recent years, whether you we

quickly got rid of him, he was enemy number one for them, such was the fate of leonid kravchuk, viktor yushchenkond petro poroshenko, that's all, and we reached collapse, fiasco, and war. now, what can be next, of course, from this process of military exit for now. which isn't, but it may be found someday, at least in a low intensity war, there may be a change in russia, andrew, and then the question is we'll have a window of opportunity again, it won't be long, uh, it could be there 10 years, then russia will demonstrate its imperial aggression again, when you live next to a country like russia, a former continental empire that cannot win - you have to realize that at some point this feeling of imperial aggression will prevail over common sense. because you can see that everything they do is outside of the healthy mind, outside. they're destroying their own economy again, they're destroying their own society's ability to grow, they're destroying their own economic assets, they're shutting down these oil wells because they can't develop them, that's idiocy, but that's exactly what they did after

initiative, because there are also quite decent people who signed it, for example, akhtem seitablai, viktor yushchenkoers. culture, what do you think about this? well, first of all, we have to understand that if we treat questions of history like scientists, and this is a question of history, then the argument of ethnic origin is not scientific, it is some kind of primordialism, that ukrainianness is something that is given from birth, it's blood and soil, well, then i'm not ukrainian, but i have very little ukrainian blood, so i'm a constructivist here, thank god, a clear majority of our modern historians and... i repeatedly repeat this formula of benedict anderson: nations are a narrative, nations and narratives. nations are products of the public imagination, and therefore it matters in what language we form these ideas, and it does not matter so much where a person was born, you can be born in ukraine, have a ukrainian surname and be a russian nazi, as we can see many of the fugitives who are in moscow today , ethnic ukrainians, they call to kill us. isn't this an initiative to simply preserve the

for them, he was enemy number one, such was the fate of leonid kravchuk, viktor yushchenko and petroo, that's all, and we reached collapse, fiasco, and war. now, what can happen next? of course, there is no military way out of this process yet, but it may one day to be found, at least in a low- intensity war. there might be a change in russia, andrew, and then the question is, we 'll have a window of opportunity again, it won't be long, uh, it might be there for 10 years, then russia will again show its imperial aggression when you living next to a country like russia, a former continental empire that fails to win the civilizational contest, you have to realize that at some point this sense of imperial aggression will prevail over common sense, because you see that all that they do - it is beyond common sense, beyond, they will destroy again. their own economy, they destroy their own ability of society to develop, they destroy their own economic assets, they close these oil wells because they can't develop them, it's idiocy, but that's what they did after 1917, they just cut themselv

quickly got rid of him, he was enemy number one for them, such was the fate of leonid kravchuk, viktor yushchenko poroshenko, everything, and us led to collapse, to fiasco, to war. now, what can happen next, of course, from this military process. there is no way out yet, but it may one day at least be found in a low intensity war, there may be a change in russia, andrew, and then the question is that we will have a window of opportunity again, it will not be long, uh, it may be there 10 years, then russia will show its imperial aggression again, when you live next door to a country like russia, a former continental empire that fails to... win the civilizational contest, you have to realize that at some point this sense of imperial aggression will prevail over common sense, because you see that everything they are doing is beyond common sense, beyond, they are again destroying their own economy, they are destroying their own ability of society to develop, they are destroying own economic assets, they close these oil wells because they can't develop them, that's idiocy, but they did the same thing

initiative, because there are also quite decent people who signed it, for example, akhtem saitablai, viktor yushchenko as many other cultural figures that you do you think about this? well, first of all, we have to understand that if we treat the questions of history as scientists, and this is a question of history, then the argument is ethnic origin, it is not scientific, it is a kind of primordialism, that ukrainianness is something that is given from birth, it is a soil of blood, well, then i am not ukrainian, but i have very little ukrainian blood, so i am a constructivist here, thank god , a clear majority of our modern historians, and i repeat more than once. this formula of benedict anderson , the nation is a narration of nations and narrations, nations are products of the public imagination, and therefore it matters in what language we form these ideas, and it does not matter so much where a person was born, you can be born in ukraine, have ukrainian last name and to be a russian nazi, as we see a lot of people who are in moscow today, ethnic ukrainians, they are calling to kill us, is this no

the third president of ukraine, viktor yushchenko, returned to the military doctrine the course of unificationthe european union and nato. but the government then was actually under the control of the party of regions, and this movement could not take place as energetically, because. this party, as a pro-russian force, was obviously opposed to this, and we all remember what happened in the parliament at that time, on the eve of the bucharest summit. the bucharest summit of 2008 could have become historic for us, but angela merkel and nicolas sarkozy, the leaders of at that time, germany and france, the two largest countries in the european union, did not support ukraine. in fact, the way to the renewal of the conflict in europe has been opened. yushchenko approached merkel, addressed her very delicately, touched her elbow. an adequately emotional reaction from the always restrained ms. merkel is still in my mind: don't come near me, i don't have time for you, she snapped, smiled nervously, turned around and ran to the other end of the hall. everyone present became uncomfortable, spanish shame

initiative, because there's quite decent people who signed it, for example, akhtem saytablai, viktor yushchenkoany other cultural figures, what do you think about this, well, first of all, we must understand that if we treat historical issues as scientists, and this is a question of history, then the argument is ethnic origin, it is not scientific, it is some kind of primordialism, that ukrainianness is what comes from... i repeatedly repeat this formula of benedict anderson: nations are a narrative, nations and narrations, nations are products of the public imagination, and therefore weighs what language, we form these ideas, and it doesn’t matter where a person was born, you can be born in ukraine, have ukrainian surnames and be a russian nazi, as we can see many of the outcasts who are in moscow today, ethnic ukrainians, they call to kill us, or is it there is no initiative to simply preserve tchaikovsky. i think that it is commercial, i think that it is a commercial initiative in general, because it is necessary to sell seats for foreigners, let's say those who want to, i know, a lot of chi

we need to elect our current ukrainian president, nationally svidomo, viktor andreevich yushchenko, are are the fees for this terrible myth, which they believed in, that we will now be helped by the west, he will crush russia with sanctions, we let’s just get up and chase all these orcs, and then we’ll divide it, i remember, this is a huge number of round tables in lvov, how to divide russia? that is, who will get what, this is the third rake, the third national approach, for which they pay in blood, advertising. premiere on rtr, let’s get on the line yourself, it’s easy, i looked at the life of taxi drivers from the inside, honestly, it’s not all sugar, really, or something, you were appointed director, if you were 20 years older, you’d get married, marry me, i’m not divorced, okay, that’s enough , well, well, how much can i repent, well, we are a family, let’s do it again, allah taxi. tomorrow on rtr. we go to the doctor and take up a lot of his time with empty complaints. and we don’t go to the doctor when we seriously need to go. forewarned is forearmed. any remedy has a downside.

there were some favorites, there were yushchenko, dear friends, yes, the same poroshenko, that is, something is wrong, that is, with the system itself, but, mr. viktoring, because it gives such this is a toxic thing, let's be honest, that both rusvilt and chercha had their favorites. in famous politicians who are difficult to blame for anything, yes, we know what boris johnson was on fire, also on the person he nominated, and that person, i forgot the name, compromised johnson and he had to resign, but we we are talking about the fact that now, at least under poroshenko , the bpp and uh balanced each other there. change, eh, and they had to agree, and history played a very evil joke with zelensky, he got maximum power, which was not available in yanukovych, which kuchma did not have, we are no longer talking about yushchenko and poroshenko, but that's why, let's say here that both yushchenko and poroshenko had many of their favorites there, yes. but it was not one person, here we see the usurpation of power by one favorite, in fact, he does not allow it, well , of course, and that is why i believe that president zelenskyi is there, well, a very weak

encouraged and it was said that this book, yushchenko and other bandrology gave her the shevchenko prize, as if they were exhibiting it there, and we clearly conveyed to viktorell, to yanukovych as the president, that such books cannot receive a state prize, otherwise how would you lead to a civil war here , they planted this pig on you, then let’s clean it up, to which he only grunted in response and didn’t break this scheme in any way, that’s all. this happened, but the main thing is different, these days in april in the city center they were selling, who are you talking about now? yanukovych is vitka shapka, yes vitka shapka, absolutely right, yes or a cap, i don’t know what he was putting on his head, no, who received a hotka for crouching in the eagle pose in the toilet, quickly pulled off their hats and he ran, women, yes, yes, he ran into the women’s toilet, two meters from what, he couldn’t even commit a serious crime, he robbed women, women, he’s just a nonentity. well, in general, ukrainians have some kind of talent for choosing all leaders, just a great talent, well, it’s like a folk pastime, and there’s jumping on a rake, like as soon as my fello