agreement, viktor yanukovych did not sign this document during the summit of the european union in vilnosamous euromaidan began, after which it was also signed in two parts. association agreement with the european union. the first part was then signed by prime minister viktor arseniy yatsenyuk the second part is president petro poroshenko. and the agreement began to work. and 10 years later, we are already starting full-fledged negotiations on joining the european union. despite the fact that the association agreement is not just a document that is signed. it is also a document that needs to be implemented, one way or another. and this, too, is quite a serious story, about which you must always remember that this... was a fairly short process between the agreement and the beginning of the negotiations, what the process of the negotiations itself will be, of course, it is difficult to say, because on along this path, there are still many real problems of some kind, problems related to the entry of ukraine into the negotiation process itself, because each section of these negotiations will

countries of the group of seven, which, in fact, was agreed upon by the parties at the nato summit in vilnos last year, and i think that it is valid . a really important stage, especially if you look at the agreement with the united states, it is really a comprehensively developed document, a fundamental, fundamental agreement that significantly strengthens relations between kyiv and washington, and obviously there are such important conditions for us as confirmation of our euro-atlantic course, and this once again proves that we must move along this path and us.

by this you would were supposed to deal with the de-russification of soviet jewry in the areas from vilnorael, and it seems to me that it is already de-russified in... at least in the former soviet union, well, but no, well, so, as i understand it, the whole this is called by feygin between himself, when he said that we are all jews here and latina protested that she was not, this is something that just falls somewhere under this very paradigm of ostrivets, and here i am involuntarily reminded of the collapse of the previous russian empire, i am reminded of excellent journalism. says botinsky, do you remember, well , it's just a doll, what he writes about warning the jew, addressing the jewish audience itself, the jewry of the russian empire and warning against assimilationism and warning, there are these very comical episodes, that there is the anniversary of komiserzhevska in odessa, yes in the 18th year, where there was not a single russian, and where only the jews themselves stood up, stood up for this very russian... , when they insist on, and on the other hand, what was it that they

conversation, that this is what you should be doing, the de-russification of soviet jewry in the spaces from vilnoisrael, and it seems to me that it already is further rotsified in at least the former soviet union, well, but no, well, that means, as i understand this whole conversation called by feigin, when he said that we are all jews here, and latynina protested that... she was not, well this is something that just falls somewhere under this very paradigm of an island, and here i am involuntarily reminded, excuse me, of the collapse of the previous russian empire, i am reminded of jabotinsky’s publicist, remember, well, it’s just a doll, what he writes about warningly, addressing jewish audience proper, to jewishness of the russian empire and... warning against assimilationism and warning, there are these very comical episodes, such as the commissarzhevskaya jubilee in odesa, in the 18th year, where there was not a single russian, and where only the jews stood up, stood up for this very russian culture, as he says, is the russian of moses' law and says that it is terribly comical, so this is a