it is in violation of well- established law.he representative does not know that, then she is woefully ignorant of the applicable law. i am astounded that she is standing up here and arguing with a straight face that i had an obligation to allow an inspection. the u.s. supreme court has declared to the contrary. if they do not know it, they should know it. commissioner murphy: can i ask you one question? why don't you let the inspectors in? >> because i believe in freedom. i have rights, just like i have a right to free speech. i do not have to explain to anyone why. it says in the fourth amendment i have these rights. it says i have a right to privacy in the california constitution, a right to dignity. i do not need to be exposed to unsolicited accusations. if they have a problem, they have no remedies. i am insisting on my rights. i think we would be a better country, quite frankly, if more people did that. commissioner walker: i am ready to talk about it. >> thank you for your time. the point is, there is nothing to abate, so

one is if it violates state or federal statutes. second is if it's contrary to what the law calls public policy. but more about these later. for the moment we'll concern ourselves with agreements that have been ruled illegal because of statutory violations. here are some examples. [narrator] >> six days a week this grocery store is no different from thousands of other american maet it sells eveing fromamburger to paper towels and tries to keep up with the competition by keeping prices down and running an occasional special, but there is one thing that marks this store as different. it has to comply with what are known as sunday statutes. technically speaking, sunday statutes prohibit the formation or performance of certain contracts on sunday. this means that onceunday rolls around the sale of most merchandise in this city is illegal. the law only permits necessities like food and medicine to be sold. sometime ago on what seemed to be an otherwise typical sunday afternoon, an officer of the court walked into this grocery store and c

the types of code violations were discovered included fire safety and exiting violations. this is an obstructed egress on the second floor. fire and life safety issues with the doorway with a six-foot opening. it is supposed to be a minimum of 6'8". >> when you modify a building, you cannot have steps in the path of trouble -- travel. there are head clearance issues and others in this one particular area. there were multiple mechanical and blogging code violations. -- plumbing code violations. we also found sanitary, sewer, plumbing vents open inside the bathrooms. there were electrical code violations. there was exposed electrical power. power demand exceeded circuit capacity because of the wiring. i think this was a high-tech incubator, assembly. it was a very creative occupancy. they were doing creative things in order to be there. the electrical code violations included electrical panels that had exposed supply. the panels did not have the panel covers. the doors were not attached. it was a life-safety hazard in many different ways. part of our project, now we're getti

there were cited for permit violation. on december 5, cited for permit violation. on december 6 at 2011, as notified by the entertainment commission that the place of entertainment permit was no valid. on january 5, 2012, yelp.com describes of bartender who pours free drinks and takes shots. these are abc violations. january 5, 2012. a yelp.com review states "it definitely attract more of a ghetto crowd. there were people shooting craps like they were in a 1990's hip- hop video pi." sfpd arrested the intoxicated mail. it was determined that the intoxicated mail was under the influence of a narcotic and had been transported to sfgh. security never called police. for every 12th through 13th 2011, a show resulted in three arrests which was outlined a few minutes prior. for outstanding warrants, a stolen vehicle and gun charges. one of the incidents resulted in a vehicle fleeing from police in their vehicle and crashed into a wall at a dead-end on sixth avenue and they fled on foot through backyards. the suspects got away. for every 23, 2011 -- 2012. i met with tim cho

they have a commission president to has been found in willful violation. you have no concept of how corrupt these people are. i certainly found nothing comparable in society. they are ripping off a public institution of millions of dollars, and a finding of being unethical or violating sunshine ordinances and laws is just an opportunity to show how impervious they are and how we any sort of democracy is compared to the influence of money and corporate power that they possess. the fact of the matter is if you come to this ethics commission meeting and just shuffle paper, you need to be aware of how much damage you are doing because you are demonstrating how powerless democracy is, and of course, the laws cost more than the money. thank you. >> good evening, commissioners. my name is dr. -- after 20 years at laguna honda hospital, i became a whistle-blower, and then i was laid off. in the past six years, you have dismissed 29 consecutive sunshine complaints. even though you substantiated 20% of them, none resulted in any enforcement action, and only one was

they have not violated the treaty, also on their end while they are doing the clamp down would violatetion we have back in december. >> this muslim brotherhood. this is not a peacemaker. >> bottom line no matter what we do or don't do, they are looking for reason to attack israel. they are hell bent on doing that. which is inherently the problem. they are more likely to keep peace with a pork chop at this point. if you really want to heard them. >> let's use pork. [ laughter ] >> take away the things they care about which is western culture. they are holding the hostages money. like me punishing the kid by taking allowance and he threatens to my kid's sister. if you take away things they love there, iphones and top culture stuff they love, they won't be so tough. >> 71% don't want our money. there are 16 americans who are in danger being referred to trial. >> and at the same time we're facing brand-new situation in egypt. we've got iran. you have seen this week the attacks on israeli diplomats. israelis say they will respond. they clearly believe it was iran. isn't there a concern that

by another name and also a violation of the free speech clause. not a solution at all. >> anything to add to that? >> i would say that as i indicated in my remarks, taking a step back from the current back-and-forth about the narrow language being discussed and try to reflect on what is the basic principles we want to protect and how to go about that. me, i can go pretty far. but, i think you know just to be a little bit provocative, the idea that we really had to have a new federal statute to delegate all this authority around preventive health benefits, secretary sabella said her team to for everybody else, i question that. we have a lot of employers out there that are responsive to the needs of their workers. we have lots of state legislatures that are responsive to the needs of their citizens. i really question whether we needed as a country to delegate a once and for all requirement for the department of health and human services and the proposition across the board for everybody. that was in my judgment problem number one. the second is if w

it violates the bill of rights. no president has the ability to violate those bill of rights. those constitutional rights we have. and then the president just a few days ago came out with what he called an accommodation. an accommodation where he said, ok, we'll carve out a little more exception. still doesn't apply to an employer for example, that has those same religious beliefs, but he said we'll carve out an exemption. well guess what? after the president carved out that exemption so to speak they actually issued a final rule. this is the final rule from the obama administration after he gave a press conference, giving a political speech. and in the final rule it says these regulations finalize without change interim final regulations. in other words, they didn't even put any of the things from the president's press conference where he said he was going to give accommodations. no, that's in the final rule. the final rule still says if you're a catholic school for example, or a catholic church and i know colorado christian university is one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit

both union and confederate soldiers violate it, the confederates for more practical reasons violate it more often. known as the cartel phase. the negotiations begin in the early part of 1862 when generals from both sides argue that something needs to be done to rectify this situation. and it happens right after the first large-scale surrender of an army. and that is when the confederate army surrenders at ft. donaldson in february. and by july 1862 after the failed peninsula campaign, the system goes into effect. and it will last for about a year. and it's known as the dick's hill cartel because it's named for the two generals who created it. union general john dicks and confederate general d.h. hill. and what this system does is it modifies the parole system. that now soldiers themselves are not allowed to sign paroles. only the two generals or any of their respective agents can sign paroles and conduct the exchanges. so what this means is that if you surrender as a soldier, whether you're in the union or the confederacy, you will be taken to a prisoner of war camp, held there for a f

what kind of violation to you see?ties of parties in the value chain. we certainly had issues by a purported beneficial interest holders. entities that had reportedly purchased the loan and were entitled to the loan. in many cases, they do, but there were not able to document. we also saw. laird is by the servicers and trusties, the entities that specialize in tearful services and foreclosures. -- the fall services and foreclosures. çyou asked earlier, is this jut a matter of the volume of foreclosures? it is also a matter of the bottom of originations. the production machine was running at 126% of capacity. they were having some problems documented and archiving documents. when things turn bad andç the have to recreate that chain of title and you have to lookç at the documentation around the assignments, who owns the loan, some of the documents were missing or was not prepared. çit does not mean the sale did notç happen, but there is no evidence of it. >> are we talking about criminal problems, or are we just tal

but you of course violate your obligation as a union soldier. which of those two are you going to do? >> go back to the army. >> you'd like to go back to the army. right. so you'd like to rejoin your comrades. would some of them have qualms about this? yeah. if honor is important to you, you're going to tell lee he's got to go away and he has to honor this system that's in place. and the troublesome thing for the union soldiers was there was a union general who was captured along with them. they were debating among themselves about whether they should sign the parole. a lot wanted to go back home immediately but the general, named general graham said you can't do that men. you are union soldiers. it essentially created a riot among the union prisoners while lee is trying to take them back down to virginia because they didn't know which of those decisions they should adhere to. and it was easy for the general, general graham, he'll be exchanged right quick. but if you're a private you can expect of course to be in confederate captivity for some t

out that a letter had been sent using the phrase, which i do not have before me, dismissing or no violation found, as though the ethics commission had actually had some process in place. it was pretty shocking. and i wanted to tell you about the real-world consequences of this, which i think is important for you to recognize. this is not just a piece of paper over year and another piece of a lot over here, and do they or do they not match up, but there were very significant consequences in the real world that hurts library users. thank you. >> commissioners, the director of san francisco open government. as documented in a recent civil grand jury report, this ethics commission has failed to carry out and responsibilities related to the sunshine ordinance. through this, the ethics committee has sided with the city and against citizens in every case where public records were withheld. not only has this ethics commission failed in its duties, in as woefully and knowingly avoided the efforts of the sunshine ordinance task force. it has done this for years while representing its efforts as tryin

he kind of like violated my privacy in a sense.nning around here with fendi, doing things he ain't got no business doing, disrupting the program in the jail setting, period, you know? and it is really starting to irritate me. if me and him cross paths, i'm going to try my hardest to knock all his teeth out of his mouth. that's how i feel. as long as he stays far away from me, he will go home in one piece. i ain't got nothing against homos. it is what it is. but i do got something against casper. >> back downstairs, casper is still agitated and refuses to enter big daddy's former cell. even when he's no longer in it. >> i'm not moving until the sergeant comes in here and talks to me. you're going to drag me out of here. this is [ bleep ]. >> i'm going to let you pass right now as far as a major or anything, if i write you up on a major, you're going to go to the hole. you don't want to do that. for now, just go cool off in your cell. we'll get a hold of the sergeant, all right? >> all right. i expect the sergeant to be here tonight.

the provision could be removed from office simply for a campaign violation while in office as opposed to a candidate running who is not -- who has not attained office. this may be the construction but maybe i am wrong, i am not certain if i am reading this correctly. >> i am hillary ronin and i work for supervisor campos and i want to thank you for the work you have done and for meeting with our office, and what is before you today, i wanted you to know that his intention is not to move ahead with the ordinance that is currently before the place on the june ballot. if you do approve, what is before you today, this meets the approval of the board of supervisors. there is only one difference between the proposal today, this is the software the hard cap. he had a small preference for the hard cap because this was cleaner, and the safest way to go, he agrees with the preferences for the soft cap. this may indeed come before him. thank you very much. >> do you have comments on this legislation? >> i think that the confusion is because there are a couple of tyoppos. this should be the priva

that sounds like a violation of the first amendment. not a solution at all. >> would you like to add to that? >> i would say that, as i indicated in my remarks, it is time to take a step back from the current back and forth about the language being discussed and it reflect on the basic principle we want to protect and how to go about that. i would go pretty far. just to be a little bit provocative, the idea that we really had to have a new federal statute the delegated all this a party around help benefits to secretary sebelius and her team to decide for everybody else -- i questioned that. we have lots of employers who are very responsive to the needs of their workers. there are lots of state legislators who are very responsive to the needs of their citizens. i question whether we need to delegate a once and for all requirement. that was probably, in my judgment, problem #one. if we go now to the point of protecting our constitutional liberties, i think we should do that in a very wholesome way. it should not be just to protect my judg

. >> this is a violation. >> we'll hear from both sides and find out what catholics think of the plan. >>> tonight at 11:00, a suspect shot a police officer injured. berkeley police officers were trying to take a suspect into custody when they say he pinned one officer between two cars. kron4's reporter is live from castro valley. why were the berkeley officers apprehended in castro valley? >> reporter: well, investigators say that those officers were following the suspect in connection with the crime that took place in berkeley. there are investigators on scene still combing over these cars. these cars have been left where they were at 5:00 this evening. this is video i shot earlier in the evening. you can see the bullet hole right here in the suspect's car where police shot at him. the officers followed -- followed the suspect and tried to apprehend him. other officers following the suspect, that is when they opened fire shooting the suspect. now, both the suspect and the officer were taken to local hospitals. >> at this intersection, center and grove in castro valley, we decided to

that would be something -- it could be part of a nearly year violation. i know we have a bunch of complaints on this building. somersault, some not resolved. some of them are held up because of appeals. that back wall did not look the best in the photograph. >> it also looks like it does not matched the drawing. >> it is hard to tell. some issues with the building. inspection services could get involved in the bathroom tissue and the maintenance of the building. i think they are. i do not have anything with me tonight. >> we will take public comment. >> thank you. to the comments he made earlier about giving a forum for people who do not have attorneys, i appreciate you remembering the details of my bathroom. i stand here today eight months later, six months after i saw you, with no bathroom. about the rent board, they rolled in my favor. the rent board does not have the authority to make the bathroom go back and. inspection has been out three times. i have a trial date set for july 2012. must i wait until then for a superior court to rule if i should hav

california and united states constitutions, the committee has acted in ways that knowingly and willfully violate the constitutional and civil rights of the citizens of san francisco. some may feel that i am being too harsh in this, but i think prior speakers and myself have to really look at the records, and for the first time, we are now on the public record so that the citizens of this city can actually see what this ethics commission has done up until now in the dark. and i will quote senator barry goldwater in his 1964 presidential acceptance speech of the republican nomination, where he said extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. you have not done your job as far as sunshine and the citizens of this city. you took an oath to support and defend the constitution, and yet when citizens come to you and say "we were denied an opportunity at a public meeting to meaningfully comment and participate," you ignore it. you side with the city 100% of the time. now, it is kind of hard to argue with that record as being one that is totally unjus

united nations members except the us and usually criticizes many governments for injustice and violations the first country to respond to the american criticism was china which has been reporting on human rights us since nine hundred ninety eight the russian report focuses on the us today mentioning the one tunnel bay prison and violation of the rights of american muslims it also covers the european union nato members and georgia. i want to thank you very much for being with us hello thanks well first of all. the question. about your current position about. john burey here are keeping the position of the spur of a special envoy within the foreign ministry was established just this year or so or pleasure last year last year. i didn't hear a couple of months ago right so whose decision was it why was it decided in the kremlin in the foreign ministry or. well. has been established as you put it last year it was. more than a couple of months it was established last april actually and this almost a year time flies and the decision has been taken by the russian leadership obviously and of cours

they are violating our conscious. finally, i am happy to be standing among these brave men and women and i am so glad catholics are standing up and saying that catholicism is not synonymous with opposing birth control. we know catholic women use contraceptives. those working or studying at georgetown should have the same right to contraceptives as our peers working or studying at george washington university. i am happy with the obama administration decision to stand with and respect women. i hope that students at the religious affiliated colleges and universities will not continue to be denied the basic rate of contraceptives because our insurance plans do not cover the services. it is not my place to tell the catholic church what to believe. but as a student, i must speak out about what i believe when it comes to a decision that will directly impact my peers and on. college students trust their universities. it is their job to nurture and support us so that we can be the best people we can be. and as we grow and to

we actually want that footage to expose the human rights violations journalists are having a hard time getting access in places like darfur like syria so these are things that people actually want and it's no different than strapping a camera onto remote control plane and people aren't crying evasion of privacy they're actually saying we want more of that stuff happening well that's not exactly the case here in the u.s. are you seeing law enforcement start to use drones we saw that they were wanted to at the republican national convention also have some drones but they decided that maybe they'd scratch them because it was too expensive and you know personally i don't find that all that comforting well our argument is to do it in areas of large scale massive human rights violations in the areas of genocide or crimes against humanity in war crimes and so there are questions certainly with civil liberties and privacy our argument is we're focusing on these areas where sometimes getting footage is hard or sometimes it's able to get it done but you can see the huge force for the trees and w

that sounds like a violation of the first amendment by an ethnic also a violation of the free speech clause. not a solution. >> anything to add to that? >> well, i would say that, that as i indicated in my remarks, that it's time to take a step back from the current back and forth about the narrow languages in disgust, and sort of tried to get, reflect on what's the basic principle want to protect and have to go about that. now, me, i go pretty far, you know? but i think, you know, this deal is provocative. the idea that we really had to have i think the federal statute delegated all this authority around the potential health benefit to secretary sebelius and her team to decide for everybody else, i question that. we have lots of employers out the door to respond to the needs of their workers. we have lots of state legislatures that are very responsive to the needs of their citizen. i really question whether we need as a country to delegate a once and for all requirement, that the department of health and human services should decide as a proposition across the board for everybody. t

directly related to the public financing program, and to th i y violate the single subject rule, with respect to the ordnances. >> do we have that? you mentioned that these comments -- >> again, i have no particular problem with the 15,000 threshold for the incumbents and i agree with mr. hill, you can make that change in the third tier 2 address that. with respect to the mayor, i still think this should be raised to 80,000, and if you use the same 1.5 factor that would require 120,000 in qualifying contributions from at least 1200 contributors by a certain deadline. if they are incumbent i would support the mayoral iec of $2 million on page four and five. the timing of the payments on page 7, 142 days. i think that this kind of works. i would look at something in that neighborhood that was like 147. there was a provision elsewhere that candidates can claim the funds up to 40 days after the election and i thought that the program has 40 days post for a total of 180 days. this is close to that. 142 eventually falls on a sunday. and there is a proposal to eliminate the candidate availab

the governor vetoed the bill saying that it violated proposition 22. two years later the legislature passes a similar bill, again it is vetoed. in 2008 the california supreme court throws out proposition 22 saying that it violated the state constitution. backers of responded with proposition 8, amending the constitution and it passed with a 52 percent majority. the first legal challenges were filed in 2009. >>pam: and new details, prosecutors have filed lewd acts-chest complaints against teachers arrested and accused of lewd acts against children. the loss angeles unified school district board voted unanimously to terminate this teacher who taught at serramonte elementary school. that is the same campus where a veteran third grade teacher is alleged to have committed lewd acts with 23 children. an alameda county sheriff's deputy has pleaded not guilty to rape charges. he is accused of attacking a woman in morocco back in september. so far, no other details have been released. right now, he is on paid administrative leave. a new report shows that a numb

the sunshine task force found the violation so egregious it is a willful violation of the requirements of the sunshine ordinance. the referred to the ethics commission for enforcement. it is required of all public officials. the ethics commission unanimously voted that president the "remove from office in light of her actions." after due process, rules of evidence, and advice from the city attorney, this was found to be the most serious finding of any sunshine violation in the history of the city and county of san francisco, and the entire 17-year history of the ethics commission. at the february 2 meeting, the library commission endorsed this abuse by reelecting a president to continue as their president by a unanimous vote. the privatization of our public assets goes hand in -- hand in hand with the degradation of our democracy and our traditions of open government and public participation. as we have seen many times, the public is guilty until proven innocent, but those who do corporate dirty work are innocent even after proven guilty. that is why the lies cost more than money. than

this violates the health care act. if i were president i would stop it. he needs realtime effective be president for a month and show conservatives what it would be like. >> sean: biggest issue that people get very emotional about, because it violates the third amendment, religious freedom is this so-called accommodation on the contraceptive mandate. maybe even front a lawsuit to stop it because it is such a clear violation of liberty. >> that would be a good thought but i think conserves are missing the point about this. obama did not make a mistake in this mandate. it's a deliberately calculated move on his part. democrats realize that abortion is not a winner for them. now it's ten points more pro-life than pro-choice because of the publicity of the anti-abortion people, possibly because of the aging of the population. the point is it's a loser issue. what they are trying to do now is replace with contraception. so after santorum won iowa, should states have the right to ban contraception. where did that come from? then you web the abc debate where geo

that is a violation of the equal protection laws, and it's klaus a violation of the due process clause. >> are we view in the view of the way the supreme court has told us to decide constitutional issues that the broadest should be avoided and the in a are rowest adopted. are we free to do anything other than california's repeal of an initiative constitutes a violation? your closing speech would require a holding that any state that did not permit gay marriage would be in violation of the constitution. there say possibility i think in this case of saying that proposition 8's withdrawal of the right of gay marriage from gays and rez beans. lesbians is unconstitutional. lesbians is unconstitutiona under the circumstances they enjoyed that right, given every other aspect of marriage and all that is taken away is the honorrific designation. are we free to go beyond your ruling in your favor? a holding of the repeal to the right to marriage, the right to use the label "marriage" and to receive -- >> from do i what i think is, i think the answer to your yes is that you could decide this on t

the question of violations is not making the bomb the question of violations is it safeguards agreement the whole point of the. peace now to gain tourist things. only if you would if you were absolutely transparent and open and a iran has not been well iran's and if you want to go back to gilberto if i go back to gilbert in brussels iran's nuclear program is the most inspected program in the history of the i.a.e.a. what do you think about all of this here if i can stay with you in brussels i mean is this it there's a drumbeat to worry respective of what the i.e.e.e. i and i eighty eight has to say about anything because most people said the last report was just a recycled one of the one before go ahead. but i think this is of off the mark the issue has moved on the issue of relations with iran has moved on considerably from the strict strict starting point of its nuclear ambitions. no what were side issues have become the central issue that is the economic warfare being being and entered into against the. the ratcheting up of sanctions which in a certain word a certain point the quantit

human rights organizations to use people to monitor human rights violations we either give visas and do it with the permission of governments were sometimes they sneak in and go in there without governments knowing in burma for example lots of people are being killed there we've got human rights monitors there so the technology of drones it's cheaper it's more available and you don't have to put why is there a risk why not use technology to further advance what people already doing and allow people to see more the force from the trees than ever before and let's not forget that when we say cheaper we still mean about a couple hundred thousand dollars right now they're not millions anymore but they're getting deeper but i think that you know and scott i want you to chime in here too does when this bring up a number of very big legal issues. oh of course i mean you know we see that right now with the cia and the state department's operating grown programs with clients over iraq which new york times tells us in the feature story yesterday he is arousing all sorts of concerns there and th

. >> sean: biggest issue people are emotional about for all of the right reasons because it violates religious liberties and freedoms. we go out to people of all faiths is accommodation on the contraceptive mandate. seems he can challenge the president, maybe even front a lawsuit to stop it because it's a clear violation of it. >> that would be a good thought. i think conservatives are missing the point about this, obama did not make a mistake in this mandate. it's a move on his part. democrats realize that abortion is no longer a winner for them. used to be 10 points more pro-choice pro life. possibly because of the publicity of the antiabortion people, possibly because of the aging of the population. but the point is that what they're trying to do is replace witness contraception. so first piece of evidence is after santorum won iowa, first is do you think states should have the right to ban contraception? then, do you remember that abc debate where george ste stev -- stephanopoulos went after romney trying to pin him down on contraception, and do they have power to do it? do you r

it is swapping out one code violation for another code violation. and it is procedurally wrong