found to have violated them again. there no consequences? >> don't forget her predecessor was removed by governor bush for incompetence. when i asked her on the stand in the federal trial how many changes did you make to the personnel of her, woman who was removed for incompetence, how many people did you replace? guess what the answer was? no one. she kept everybody there. all the people who were screwing it up 15 years ago are still screwing it up today. that office is unbelievable. it's like they hand out sedatives in the morning to all the employees. i did depositions of these employees. they don't know what they are doing. it's incredible. incredible the cheating allowed for them to stay in office. >> sean: i think it's impossible, i don't believe this is credible at all, and if the panhandle, congressman, if the panhandle can get it right after hurricane michael and what happened to them, and abide by the law, they would have, i think, a reasonable excuse. if they had some problems or whatever, maybe needing a li

>> for any violation in the planning code, if you fail to abate the violation, the maximum penalty is up to $250 a day from that point on, as long as the violation continues. >> even with the permit, the notice of violation can be satisfied by the office use could continue. what would happen then? >> it cannot continue, essentially. it has to be used as a dwelling unit. now that the notice of violation has been issued, and it was abated, because of this permit and assuming some other associated documentation, the notice of violation has been issued. if the violation continues, than these can begin to approve. >> thank you. >> i have a question. sorry mr teague. the property, evidently, by the tenants that are on the property , say it has been vacant since 2015. in san francisco, we do have vacancy controls. aren't they supposed to -- and then the other thing is, they are a block book notification -- is there a black book notification. >> not that i am aware, but i can check. >> is bbn only good for building permits are planning staff? >> it is for any permit or any other application t

routine inspection with the date on and the type of violations. i don't know if you can pick this up. may be close up on the violation part. so there were 175 inspections done. we had 375 mobile foods and pushcarts. you can tell here, it says the various violations, no hot water , permit license inspection report not posted. food safety certificate of food handling, available defective plumbing, modern risk food temperatures. it goes the whole gambit. the number of applications received from 2017 until present has been 122 applications. seventy-five have been approved. it's in a spreadsheet if you would like to look at it. i will throw it out to questions >> i have a couple questions. i noticed on the spreadsheet you have not said routine unscheduled. i assume you would not schedule these because you want to come up -- >> routine it means not schedule >> i don't know why the jargon is that way. >> my question really is, are each of these facilities on some sort of a regular schedule from your department to be inspected? is there an annual inspecti

it is a violation of not only state law because it is a misdemeanor. it violates article 19h. this authorizes is director to discipline. to date mr. yahya aldabyani has not disputed the fact his establishment engaged in the presented to about could sale. in march of 2018 he was cited for selling to -- tobacco to an underaged customer. they sited the employee. you will hear testimony from the department's inspector who inspected mr. yawn's establishment as a result of the complaint they sold to a person underage. current law authorizes the department's director to suspend a permit up to 90 days for first time violation. the department has recognized that such suspension may cause financial hardship. as a result promulgated rules and regulations automatically bringing down a 90 day suspension for first time violator to 25 days. there are additional measures to allow them to further reduce the 25 day suspension to practically zero days if they engage in mitigation measures. you will hear from mr. prado who will talk about the measures mr. mr. yahya aldabyani agreed to bring the s

violation of united nations security council resolution because of u.s. unilateralism the countries like your like china like russia even like turkey they are thinking to have independent financial system from the u.s. dollar lives dominance but before we get carried away ghibli swift the financial transaction system they said it wasn't related completely toward trump has done but they immediately suspended some iranian bank access so if they are read the. stop business with iran from almost two thousand and six or two thousand and twelve and iran could iranian economy could resist without despite of sanctions despite of sanctions on central bank despite of sanctions on oil and everything iran has already experienced sanctioning or its central bank for six years i think this time it would not be international consensus on sanctioning iranian oil or central bank therefore iran would have more rooms and . nowheres to play and to resist because trump does say he wants new negotiations so if you were still a senior nuclear negotiator for iran and you had to g

this use can be in violation of antitrust laws. nothing that prohibits the market power that misuse of that power so not only privacy consumer protection but also antitrust that has to be assessed you all know america is well aware we all carry with us the most sophisticated tracking devices ever invented our phones monitor our movements on a minute by minute basis and privy to the most intimate conversations we use them as credit cards and to monitor our health they may know us better than we know ourselves and the ones collecting the data know us best of all. that is also a big tech and worse, there is little that any individual can do about it. that is of the basis of innovation it is an invitation we have seen this year that misuse and abuse of our data represents a threat to consumer safety, but also national security, the defense of our nation and health of our democracy we need changes i look forward to collaborating with my colleagues and this committee to pass bipartisan legislation to set clear rules on consumer privacy a

accusing russia of an outrageous violation of ukrainian sovereignty if it was russia's seizing of three ukrainian ships off the disputed crimean peninsula ukraine's president says it's a new phase of aggression and has called on parliament to impose martial law in ukraine also coming up tonight british prime minister theresa may intensifies her campaign to get a hostile parliament and a divided nation to support her breaks a deal with the european union lawmakers are due to vote on her plan on december eleventh and the spacecraft inside will reach mars in just a couple of hours scientists hoping to dig beneath the planet's surface to find out how it was formed billions of years ago. i broke off it's good to have you with us we start at that emergency session of the u.n. security council the u.s. ambassador to the you win has accused russia of committing an outrageous violation of ukraine's sovereignty by seizing several ukrainian naval vessels near the disputed crimea region nikki haley warned that the u.s. will retain crimea related sanctions against russia the ukrainian president petr

most of the violations committed by brenda snipes are civil violations.he only penalty is which she doesn't pay it comes out of her office. it is true there are felony statutes of fraud. there are about 20 of them this florida. so far three agencies in florida say we have no evidence of fraud, but, sean, their investigation is in the premature stage and only cursory so far. so it is good that the attorney general, pam bunty, is vowing an intensive examination. snipes had the audacity to stand in front of cameras and say until now nobody accused her of doing anything wrong. which is a lie. every election she's been presiding over since 2002 has been marred in controversy. the question is: is she capable of corruption? the track record says she is. >> sean: it isn't even that laws were broken. we saw what they said about florida constitution. without rehashing what i said about brenda snipes history, you have to wonder why she is there and more importantly what do you see on the legal side? >> sean, i think you hit on the right question right though at the

number one, snipes violated state and federal retention requirements, and number two, snipes violatedhe affirmative responsibility to preserve evidence. why was this roll and not fired? yet today miss snipes was on to mess up yet another, or overturn yet another election in florida. if that's not enough to infuriate you after the court's decision about miss snipes, the state of florida announced it would be monitoring broward's 2018 election. let me tell you what a mess we are in. there are reportedly thousands of newfound ballots. each one is five' pages long. do you think a woman who loses thousands of ballots, who doesn't want to turn them in within 30 minutes off the polls are closed should be trusted? do you think she should be allowed to view five times, because that's how long the ballots are. of thousands and thousands of missing ballots? this is lunacy. voter fraud is insidious. it causes people to think their vote doesn't matter. but it's worse than that, folks. there are reportedly transcripts now that prove when the democrats say they want every vote counted when might. bu

the russian position is they are not in violation of the treaty. how do you bring the russians back into compliance when they don't think they're out of compliance to begin with? that's the reason the president made it clear 10 days ago that we would withdraw from the treaty, i think that would be justifiable if i didn't have to mention china. i could also mention words like i won in north korea. the reason is, leaving aside some of the successor states of the soviet union, the only two states banned by the inf treaty are russia and the united states. it's our view that, the russians have violated and withdrawn from the treaty. so, that leaves one country bound by the inf treaty and we are sitting in it. think about that. if we had successfully launched an effort, 10 or 12 years ago to bring china into the inf treaty, to universalize it, we might be in a different circumstance. is there a person in the room who thinks china will destroy half of their ballistic missile capability to come into a universalize inf treaty? the diplomatic response to rep

it doesn't mean he violated the law.ing to impeach the president, you have to meet that standard. we are such a divided country. whoever the next president is, you don't want the first conversation to be had, they did x on y, we think they've done something wrong. this is still a country where you have to prove it. do i think there's some problems here, and it was a bad day politically for the president? i do, the fact that he -- the one guy that was doing all of the deals with women and affairs. and the financial transactions and did other favors for the president, whatever that is. you take that with all the other cooperators, this is a bad day for the president, something's going to come out, even if it's not impeach, it doesn't look very good. >> at a minimum, phil mudd anything to add? >> i agree. the question isn't whether the president did something unethical, the question is whether we should overturn the will of the people. that bar ought to be very high. >> very high. >> when madison was working on high crimes

accuses russia of an outrageous violation of ukrainian territory over the seizure of three ships off the crimean coast. hello i'm barbara starr and this is al jazeera live from london also coming up on the program turkish police combed through two villages south of istanbul as they search for the remains of jamal khashoggi the united arab emirates frees a british academic sentenced to life in jail but insists that he was a spy and jobs on the line general motors to close three plants in the u.s. and canada laying off eight thousand workers. ukraine and its allies are demanding the return of three ships seized by russian forces off the coast of crimea in the worst flare up of tension between the two countries in several years the crisis has been the subject of emergency meetings that nato and the un while in kiev the ukrainian president signed that the creek to impose temporary martial law that proposal now has to be agreed by the parliament in kiev for this feud blew up when russia sees a sri ukrainian bro boats in the car straight and important shipping channel for ukraine it's clos

of city has national sovereignty and therefore in violation of international law have to say that to reserves that means tone in this speech was awful. her reaching out to russia was in the form of a mother there eating out a cow citron child then promising said channel that it will be forgiven if it was to change its ways this is not the way to affect not push more with any country much less the largest country and the most powerful mochi in europe and less western governments not to see the world through russia's eyes and understand how russia sees things and starts to have some kind of sympathy with russia's point you'd at least understand and then there will be no meeting of minds and this will just go into the box marked into that well if we look at where else to reason may said in his speech he said that new case ready to establish a more productive relationship with russia days thing that happening it'll go in we might have lost connection i just try one more time to reason i said that you know of the tories and they said that the u.k. is right to establish and will productive

i'm a says she won't violate your own treaty terms alleged violations of international law when the labor party were in government were famously exposed at britain's iraq inquiry senior legal advisers from the british foreign office said they were always of the view that military action in iraq was clearly a legal name made the government note of that opinion at the time it will arguably be as easy for donald trump as it was for tony blair to batter away legal advice in washington today there is treaty violation precedents concerning native americans that will be much publicized at so-called thanksgiving later this month the usa anyway is exceptional according to trump national security advisor john bolton exceptional even when arguably threatening human kind as a species arms race began at exactly the time in moment when the u.s. opted out of the anti-ballistic missile treaty putin is to meet trump in paris on sunday when they ironically commemorate almost just a day in the water when gold was so what's next in his nature's leading lights the united states a pariah a rogue nation because

again, violating the law. this morning, multiple boxes full of sample and provisional ballots left behind in some rental car, were actually discovered by an avis employee at fort lauderdale airport. this is insanity. we send election observers to other countries. we need them here. on friday, florida congressman matt gate literally blocked from observing a location where ballots were being loaded into a truck. take a look for yourself. >> why can't we watch what's going on, man? >> you can't be here. >> who told you we can't watch what's going off the truck? i would love to see. you tell me why we can't know what's going in and out of that truck. what's the name of your supervisor? >> will get all this taken care of. do you know their name? the supervisor's name what is their name? you know their names? will you tell it to me? >> what's on the truck >> sean: we are seeing in south florida is a national disgrace disgrace and it's much more than that. palm beach palm beach county violated any chance of there beg

what are you learning about the potential violations?reporter: john, the issue stems from roughly $9,000 in political contributions that whitaker received associated with his failed bid for u.s. senate there in iowa. the only problem is these donations came in early 2018, after he's already serving at the justice department as jeff sessions' chief of staff. now, the hatch act says that political appointees are not supposed to be soliciting or knowingly accepting political contributions, so there is an issue right there. a government watch dog group filed a complaint and we have learned today that the office of special counsel, no relation to the special counsel robert mueller's office, different office altogether, an independent agency, has now opened a formal investigation, john. >> not all special counsels are created equal here, lauren. this did stem, as you mention, from an ethics watch dog group complaint? >> yeah, that's right. you know, various watch dog groups have sort of been raising issues about whitaker's financial disclosure

is that people put ice build that are gross violations and. human rights in saudi we have out of hand the sort of people are. rooting in a prison without any he really could be bill charters and plus what happened in yemen by the same. led by the but our current prince therefore that is we could say that that is a crime against humanity because there is a missile. who will investigate that what body what he does not and have not the international criminal court because if you could establish and you could establish what happened in yemen against civilians and against saudis who are rotting in prison now and what happened to how should the blockade against a cup of itself if cut out of didn't what we did in two thousand and forty and what happened to us should be as a person would have happened to the top of the people a couple of leadership here therefore this man is very serious threat not only to the region but is a threat to saudi arabia as we know it matthew what words and sascha investigation achieve i mean say we had it we found culpabil

it is our view that, as i say, the russians have violated it.they have already withdrawn from the inf treaty by their violations. that leaves one country bound by the inet treaty, and we are sitting in it. think about that for a minute. if we had successfully launched an effort 10 or 12 years ago to china into the inf treaty to universalize it, we might be in a different circumstance. but is there a person in this room who really thinks china will destroy even as much as half of their ballistic missile capability to come into a universalized inf treaty? the diplomatic response to repeated treaty violations, the diplomatic response to other countries taking advantage of not being bound by the treaty 's obligations, the response by the obama administration was zero. so what encouragement does that give to our adversaries? it says cheat and succeed. don't enter into treaties with united states and succeed. what we are going to say is if you are in a treaty with the united states, you are going to abide by it. we have more lawyers per capita at the

has blacklisted russian and iranian companies the shipping millions of barrels of world violation of u.s. sanctions that accuse them of using the revenues to fund groups fighting alongside the syrian government. now a new report by amnesty international has accused saudi arabia of torturing and sexually assaulting women's rights activists held in detention they were violated by men wearing face masks other detainees were flogged and electrocuted amnesties middle east research directors has only. a few weeks after the ruthless killing of jamal khashoggi the shocking reports of torture sexual harassment and other forms of treatment of verified expose further outrageous human violence violations by saudi authorities. i'm gonna start has declared a day of national mourning after at least fifteen people were killed in a suicide attack in the capital kabul an interior ministry spokesman says more than eighty others were wounded in the assault the suicide bomber detonated his explosives inside a hall during a gathering of muslim religious scholars they were meeting to mark the birthday of t

iran treaty terms alleged violations of international law when the labor party were in government were famously exposed at britain's iraq inquiry senior legal advisers from the british foreign office said they were always of the view that military action in iraq was clearly a legal name made the government knowing of that opinion at the time it will arguably be as easy for donald trump as it was for tony blair to back away legal advice in washington today there is treaty violation precedents concerning native americans that will be much publicized at so-called thanksgiving later this month the usa anyway is exceptional according to trump national security adviser john bolton exceptional even when arguably threatening human kind as a species arms race began at exactly the time in moment when the u.s. opted out of the anti-ballistic missile treaty putin is to meet trump in paris on sunday when they ironically commemorate armistice day in the war to end all wars though what's next and is nature's leading light.

and human rights violations documented in syria are appalling you. know you for i have come across new methods of torture i had never heard of before in forty years on foot i live in bandra most importantly it. other torch it involves keeping people alive for as long as possible before they die. and that is unbelievable this is all gladly meanwhile the syrian human rights activists refuse to give up on their course. and know that tomorrow there is nothing to change we will not get to model my usual but this is a process we should keep fighting keep trying to achieve some succeed and this is a somewhat apart from the justice for all. to take time need a lot of for before and walk the most from what on earth to keep the voice of the victim the voice of her family is there to listen here to the united nations over. a beer fart hoot and holler our us new things could get dangerous when one thousand sided to join the attempted revolution in twenty eleven anyone talking of freedom and democracy risked jail but the artist and her future husband refused to b

this is a violation under international law. it is an arrogant act that the international community must condemn and will never accept. in may the united states condemned russia's construction and opening of the kirch strait bridge between russia and occupied crimea. in august, the united states condemned russia's harassment of international shipping in the sea of azof and the kirch strait. the united states will continue to stand with the people of ukraine against the russian aggression. it is our expectation that our european partners will lead this effort through the normandy four format, which we support. we call on russia to respect its international obligations and not obstruct or harass ukraine's transit in the birch strait and to de-escalate the tensions it has created. as president trump said many times, the united states would welcome a normal relationship with russia. but outlaw actions like this one continue to make that impossible. the united states will maintain its crimea related sanctions against russia. further,

this is a lot of article 3 courts telling them this violates rifra. it's injunction upon injunction and they had an obligation once they realized they violated the law to issue the interim final rule. if you compare rifra with the administrative procedures act, only one of them has a good cause exemption. in other words, there's nothing in rifra that tells the agencies, well, you can go on violating people's federal civil rights under rifra for a little while if you got a good enough reason for it, so go through the administrative process and take your time. nothing in rifra gives them that good cause exception. congress wrote the apa precisely so that the apa did have that kind of give, and what the agencies did was the exact right thing to do to balance those two interests. now, judge graber, it's not a situation where this could or would happen all the time. in fact, the situation we have here is really very unique. we had dozens of lawsuits involving hundreds of entities that had multiple supreme court orders attached to them. we had -- this is th

there were deportations and there were violations of civil libber knees that respect. the nation is not at war in the same sense than we have in the past. there's not a draft and while there is an authorization i think a declaration of war can change things but i don't know that it would be legitimate to change speech laws in the same way that it would change the economy or change physically taking people and putting them a place where they might be killed? >> now jamil, you talked about the institutional tensions. the tensions between on the one hand this and these core values and the other hand you have to protect secrets. is that one of the things that can ever be resolved? what kind of lessons can we take away from that? or is it something that has to be hashed out in every conflict with different precedents and different kinds of clashing and fighting the same battles all over again? >> i think in a lot of ways our values are changing over time, our values about what we care about and protect. when we find ourselves and the way we look at these issues, we are in a

>> theory is that the first amendment violations triggered an emergency. so the case went out actually be stronger now. >> we are still talking about the scope of the nationwide injunction in the context of the apa, this court held in the northwest environmental defense center that the courts in the apa contact are courts of equity, so the powers are broader and more flexible that the courts in that context may infrequently do go much further than they would with the public law is issued with the state and federal government than if it was just two private parties in regard to that. said i think i understood the question differently and if i didn't, it will become my question, which is on the merits of whether the good cause exception to notice and comment applies. and if not, then why not? >> my apologies, and good cause do not apply as your honor indicated, good cause, this court has held over and over again, it is to be used in emergency circumstances, and only when real harm would come, and this court has said the exception should not follow the rule.

but we thought this violation was important enough to do that. and, therefore, we informed the russians through the commission of what we understood about their program, information pertaining to the missile, to the launcher, including russia's, even its own internal designation for the mobile launcher chassis and the names of the companies involved in developing and producing both the missile and the launcher. we gave information on the test history of the ground-launched cruise missile program that we were aware of, qlug even coordinates of the test and russia's attempts to obfuscate the nature of the program. we provided all of this information and we also provided knowledge about the range between 500 and 5,500, and the fact that the violating of the treaty with this missile was actually distinct from two other missiles that russia had developed. i won't give you the descriptions of them, but we have them. we made all of that public. and we even gave, in a subsequent report, in the 2018 annual compliance report, the specific desk nay tor for

they want it specifically on the crown prince to determine whether or not he's carried out a gross violation of human rights covered by the magnitsky act mike hanna has the latest from washington d.c. . president trump's comments appear to have infuriated congress his implication that the investigation is now over as far as he is concerned that it's business as usual with saudi arabia has certainly inflamed feelings among both democrats and republicans on the hill it's been made very clear that congress is going to take whatever steps it can to get to the bottom of the matter to find out once and for all with one hundred insolvent the crown prince was responsible for the death of jamal khashoggi to get this done they are intent on introducing legislation within congress republican senator lindsey graham says there's a nuff bipartisan support within congress to get this legislation through very quickly in addition the senate foreign relations committee has sent another letter to president trump reminding him that it had already invoked the global magnitsky act which accounts for accountabilit

has blacklisted russian and iranian companies for shipping millions of barrels of oil in violation of u.s. sanctions that accuse them of using the revenues to form groups fighting alongside the syrian government. now a new report by amnesty international has accused saudi arabia of torturing and sexually assaulting a woman's rights activists held in detention they were violated by men wearing face masks other detainees and electrocuted amnesties middle east research director says only a few weeks after the ruthless killing of jamal kushal g.e. is a shocking reports of torture sexual harassment and other forms of treatment verified expose further outrageous human rights violations by the saudi authorities. so yemen now where there have been more airstrikes and gun battles in the port city of. this is so far to me the city center was one of the worst they've seen in recent days saw the amorality coalition is backing yemen's government in its fight against iranian backed rebels who control. now an estimated eighty five thousand children under five may have died from extreme hunger or dis

more often those violations are current because of how those states balance the rights of individuals against the interests and the rights of the state and i specifically want to mention the l.g.b. t. rights issue in russia's north caucasus because it's a law they have a lot of western press writes about it a lot and it's usually portrayed as a standalone issue whereas in russia it's farther of a much larger security religious cultural dialogue do you think human rights advocates even need to concern themselves with any structural analysis trying to understand the decisions that states make on those very sensitive issues three points you raise a lot of topics at once one is i don't like the use of the word balancing rights because i don't think that's the right equation we don't we don't have to trade off human rights to achieve other things we don't need. to give up human rights to be secure in fact in my view human rights help us to be more secure are there tough dilemma sometimes between which human rights is going to true trump basically one that we're here in the tech conference

violations, deterioration of all workers' income. you look at the business model that cooper has, they are using venture capital to create a monopoly to destroy legitimate competitors. i applaud taxi companies for having filed an antitrust lawsuit a couple of years ago against uber technologies. and interestingly, three days ago, a writer, -- a writer says the inside story of how uber got into business with the saudi arabian government, saudi arabia royal family now owns ten% of uber. the same people who murdered a journalist, apparently. there are bright spots that have been shown elsewhere. he has worked well over the years with the taxi industry. we are challenging on you to be the best and the brightest and find a way to get half of these uber his off the street. there will be so much less traffic to get places faster. at the same time, you will be able to help people. you need to keep the taxi industry healthy and cut back on the insurance logic -- fraud. there is rampant insurance fraud i have run out of time. thank you. >> tha