it's not exactly the opinion because i'll agree with viveck. there is a small percentage of highly talented workers that we want. using viveck's numbers, i'll go with one-third the question is why are we trying the increase the allocation for the rest? >> 3 in 10 scientists for the american association for advancement of science says that veevisas, as competitive as it s been historical because we are not graduating stem workers at the highly educated stem workers at the rate that america needs. >> you know that's a very good point i'm glad you brought that up. if we look at stem workers as a group we graduate twice as many stem workers as tiend a jo find. the u.s. bureau of census says only one in three stem degree holders have a stem i don't know. let's start about the science in particular because that's a very important workforce. the national institutes of health, the largest funder of science in this country says its number 1 problem is too many ph.d. level scientists for the number of good jobs available. so nih just launched a couple of