but vladimir maksimovich that he is such an avivalent leader and suffers from his indecision rather.d very well, i can agree on one thing, how partially it is in a difficult situation in the street, but there are several questions, firstly, he himself came into this situation, because he signed the agreement brussels so-called, where our family took obligations. ah, which he did but the other side didn't. we all understand that any contract. whatever it is, if it is not performed on one side, then the other side is not obliged to perform it here, it turns out that the furniture remembered and everything was under pressure from brussels, but that side did not do anything. they now demand to fulfill what is better taken upon themselves, as if without that person. so wait, you didn't do anything, but i think it's uh, well, this is wrong, in general, an assessment, as it were, of the political situation. this is the first. second i would like to ask your questions. let's say, well , a mushroom, if we assume, the situation is like this, but he takes such a position better than and if e, t

but vladimir maksimovich is such an ambivalent leader and suffers from his indecision rather.id very well, i can agree with one, as part of what is in the street is in a difficult situation, but there are several questions, firstly, he himself came into this situation, because he signed the so-called brussels agreement, where he sent obligations to himself. ah, which he did but the other side didn't. we all understand that any agreement of some kind is not there, if it is not fulfilled on one side, then the other side is not obliged to fulfill it here, it turns out that the furniture remembered and everything was under pressure from brussels, and that side did nothing. they are now demanding to do what is best taken over, as it were without that person. so wait, you didn't do anything, but it seems to me that this is, uh, it's wrong, in general, to assess, as it were, the political situation. this is the first. second i would like to ask your questions. let's say, well , boletus, if let's say, the situation is like this, but he takes a position to improve it, and if e, the mur

but vladimir maksimovich that he is such an avivalent leader and suffers from his indecision rather.and karelia said very well, i can agree on one thing, how partially it is in a difficult situation in the street, but there are several questions, firstly, he himself came into this situation, because he signed the so-called brussels agreement, where he assumed obligations. ah, which he did but the other side didn't. we all understand that any contract. whatever it is, if it is not performed on one side, then the other side is not obliged to perform it here, it turns out that the furniture remembered and everything was under pressure from brussels, but that side did not do anything. they now demand to fulfill what is better taken upon themselves, as if without that person. so wait you're nothing they didn't, but it seems to me that this is, well, this is wrong, in general, an assessment, as it were, of the political situation. this is the first. second, i would not ask your questions. let's say, well , a mushroom, if we assume, the situation is like this, but he takes such a position b

vladimir maksimovich, i can’t help but ask about the corruption factor, and addressed this question tohe dragon. this is quite an important lever of pressure from the west on the elites in eastern europe and had to be in the press, but to meet the opinion that the leadership of serbia, the european union, the united states is holding it on this hook, because they threaten for their independent course and take away property on the riviera and many other things. could you be more specific here? describe how effective this mechanism is. well, when we listen to the statement of milos vucavich. yes, the minister of defense we see a statement about a person who is afraid of something. the real thing is that he is on the hook, that there is compromising evidence on him or there is some kind of compromising evidence on the leaders of the party. they cease to be such leaders and create new movements. it's all a fuss. that's political. she. in principle, perhaps, it is really based on some compromising evidence, yes , which is on these leaders, but in this connection i am more concerned about ge