for admission to graduate school where there is no e level of education, which costs 4 less vladimir stefanovich why do you think these changes are important and how they will affect the preparation engineering staff? this is very important. the point is that what happened here is considered catastrophic when we signed up and started. i would say not to implement many things in the bolossian system was positive, but we took, uh, it as a carbon copy and everything that was written there, as it was translated. we started using not adapted to the needs of our economy. it's primary she was a great mistake made. and what we did, we are a 5.6-year-old education, according to which we prepared a real professional technical an engineer, relatively speaking, engineering training. yes, i don’t answer, we took it and rolled down to 4 years. this had a negative impact on the level of not specialized training, but on the level of professional competence, because any discipline. it provides lectures, then practical classes. saturns and, so to speak, training practical exercises at the training grounds, and th