it is a vodka advertisement. posted on a is the regulatory size of the 20-60 board.is currently allowed by committing. while the leased premises in the document before you has the wall face showing with and at the time, the right side is 20 by 60. i wanted you to see that visual difference. i believe that we also heard from some folks about certainly as department director, i am not opposed. hopefully we will continue to have alternative and agreeing uses throughout the state, but it comes down to looking for whenever income generation can be reasonably secured. this is all about the cost of managing the building. those funds go right back in. the alternative uses that we look at, we heard from community murals said that not just the lack of revenue but the potential expense to put them up. it should also be noted that this building, this property lined faces the wall. just like what is before you today, the proposed operator told us we must secure a separate right from the adjacent owner to be in that airspace. similarly, if something protruded from a wall, the city