we spoke with volodymyr molchan, a political scientist from kherson . of an attack on bridges and one what is it called in kherson, the chinese one raises doubts about it, because the bridge was not destroyed, it was only partly there, well, about the holed one. the goal is to destroy the place, if it was only a close-range shot, then, in principle, the task is accomplished . do you think that the ukrainian armed forces now have a goal to destroy the bridge? is it just a close-range shot in order to in the perspective of destroying the crimean bridge and not antonov in kherson, please, well, i have a lot of questions about the shooting at this bridge because somehow it appeared very quickly. for example, the armed forces warn us that it is not necessary to immediately show the places where the missiles hit, because this will affect the effectiveness of the enemy's strikes and so on and so on, but what about all these strikes, eh. even if they were not ukrainian missiles, eh, everything is the same it evidence of the fact that already the main arteries connecting the occupier located