all, all these things must be sorted out very consistently and we will do it together with volodymyr yavorskyi, the program director of the center for civil liberties. mr. volodymyr, congratulations. in you vateria espresso. glory to ukraine, and the key story is how we should correctly interpret the court's decision regarding malaysian boeing mh17, which was shot down by russian terrorists. because the decision raises a lot of different questions. the decision concerned two issues - the convention against terrorism and the second - the convention against. discrimination, but it is very important that we are talking about events that happened before 2017, so this is a very important point, because if you look at this lawsuit from the point of view before 2017, everything was quite different, there were fewer facts , was less, no there was a full-scale invasion, and of course we now look at this decision through the prism of current events, and we may not like it, but so... in this case, there's just one problem: we now understand that in fact russia did not finance terrorism, but from the very