truth, you are still an anti-corruption court confiscated the fortune of putin's oligarch volodymyr yevtushenko - this is the first such decision against a russian citizen in ukraine, the anti-corruption center, in particular, confiscated 17 real estate properties in ukraine with an area of ​​almost 100,000 square meters, the oligarch's shares in several commercial companies in ukraine were confiscated. it is interesting that there is a lot of ev- yevtushenko personally received yanukovych 's hands. three times in the years 8-11 and 10, and i will say this that there is a stew in one of the richest people in russia, very close to vladimir putin, sweden will buy 40,000 tons of wheat from ukraine, this is provided for in the latest aid package for our state in the amount of 500 billion kroner, the funds will go for the reconstruction of ukraine, humanitarian operations and the transportation of grain were reported in the government there, so sweden will help to purchase deliver ukrainian wheat to countries with a high risk of famine in this way, stockholm helps to alleviate the suffering of russi

above, the anti-corruption court of ukraine confiscated the fortune of russian billionaire volodymyr yevtushenko e-e this is reported by the anti-corruption center, in particular, it is about 17 real estate objects with a total area of ​​almost one hundred thousand square meters, as well as shares in some ukrainian companies. and yevtushenko himself, of course, through his press service, because there is no he doesn't have any assets in ukraine, so nothing could be confiscated from him, ah, um, is there really this fact of confiscation of a russian oligarch, as far as you know, and well, in general, let's talk about russian and belarusian assets in ukraine, is it possible or should they all be confiscated? how do you look at it? well, look, i don’t know anything. i also saw news reports about the decision of the anti-corruption court, and i very much welcome this decision. what about what to do with other active or should be confiscated? i think here we still need to define the border and where we confiscate where we don't confiscate but when we talk about oligarchs who are close to putin and ab

know the truth, the higher anti-corruption court confiscated the fortune of putin's oligarch volodymyr yevtushenkohe first such decision against a russian citizen in ukraine e-e informs about it the anti-corruption center, in particular, the vacc, confiscated 17 real estate objects with a total area of ​​almost 100,000 square meters. the oligarch's shares in several commercial companies in ukraine were confiscated. it's interesting that yevtushenko received yanukovych personally. years and i will say that there is a stew in one of the richest people in russia, very close to vladimir putin. sweden will buy 40,000 tons of wheat from ukraine. the funds will go to the reconstruction of ukraine, a humanitarian operation and the transportation of grain, said the government there, so sweden will help to purchase. deliver ukrainian wheat to countries with a high risk of famine. in this way, stockholm contributes to alleviating the suffering that russia has worsened for millions of those who suffer from hunger in other parts of the world, the government says sweden well, denmark also provides aid to ukrain

reconstruction should be confiscated assets, says prime minister denys myhal, billionaire volodymyr yevtushenko became the first russian businessman to lose his assets in ukraine the anti-corruption court allowed the confiscation of all his property on the territory of our country. yevtushenko is the first, but by no means the last, according to the anti-corruption center, he still has his business in ukraine oligarchs close to the russian president, why their assets have not yet been taken away, what is the risk of delay and where will the confiscated money go? allowed to reach the benefit of the state these assets were also confiscated 17 real estate objects with a total area of ​​one hundred thousand square meters yevtushenko russian a businessman whose company, according to the nsdc , manufactures drones and radar stations to the order of the russian ministry of defense in ukraine , he owned an enterprise in the field of defense and it is stated in the court ruling, although yevtushenko himself denies that he had a business in ukraine, the billionaire does not know what assets could be conf

prospects for this first case regarding the confiscation of the assets of the russian oligarch volodymyr yevtushenkocourt above began considering this case, we understand it this way, and this is the first such precedent after the adoption of the law which allows the confiscation of legal entities and individuals involved in the armed aggression of the russian federation . the minister is a node of the ministry of justice of ukraine, the lawsuit is satisfied, the assets of the foreclosure are more than 17 objects of real estate - this is the authorized capital of many companies, i am an officer who was in that shynkovtse, including such quite serious enterprises that ukraine can use after the foreclosure in fact, in his favor, and now the decision of the first instance is the next case for the appeal decision if it is submitted by that party, but in the court session, as far as we know, the representatives of e are not legal entities and yevtushenkov himself did not appear, although there were reports of the procedure established by law , after the appeal. in fact, this means that ukraine is taking

the anti-corruption court of ukraine confiscated the fortune of russian billionaire volodymyr yevtushenkowith a total area of ​​almost 100,000 m² , as well as shares in some ukrainian companies. and yevtushenko himself, of course, through his press service, because he does not have any assets in ukraine, so they could not confiscate anything from him there really is this fact of confiscation from a russian oligarch, as far as you know, and well, in general. let's talk about russian and belarusian assets in ukraine, whether it is possible or necessary to confiscate all of them. how do you see it, i don't know anything about mr. yevtushenko's assets. i also saw news reports about the decision of the anti-corruption court, and i very much welcome this decision, and about what to do with other active or whether it is necessary to confiscate, i think here we need to define the limit and where do we confiscate where we do not confiscate but when we we are talking about oligarchs who are close to putin and about state property of state or state-owned companies. it definitely needs to be confisca

of the president of ukraine sanctions have been imposed, we are talking about the oligarch volodymyr yevtushenko well, as they say, they started. so we finally started. and please tell me if this can be considered a precedent and if the scheme according to which we are now it is absolutely legal and le well, we can collect russian funds for the benefit of the state and it will be used more and more. and i first wanted to congratulate the espresso tv channel on this because you very actively covered this topic and a large part of this victory is also your merit. therefore, thank you, but here but here you need to understand that this is not such a direct victory, because this is a drop in the ocean, this is so far only one russian oligarch, and his assets, and they are actually hundreds. and that is, it is not even hundreds. i would say probably thousands of these assets russian a-a subjects subject to action and not subject to action that are in ukraine and with which we need to work. this is of course a precedent. that is, it is a confirmation that the adopted law absolutely works and there are

i understand that it is, i am reading the assets of volodymyr yevtushina vtushenko, is yevtushenko an electric plant from zaporizhzhia, then a ukrainian research project for a design and technical institute transformer reconstruction zaporizhzhia scientific engineering center ztz-service record transformer zaporizhia these are all the assets of the former kostyantyn hrygoryshyn, that's right, these are the assets or not, don't tell me." as for him, there are no ukrainian sanctions, but in the criminal proceedings the shopping center was framed, then the arrest was lifted. well, information appeared in the media that there are attempts to change the owners. that is, this is a vivid example of how divans itself is allowed to play in favor of the russians, well, in relation to them relative to the representatives of this businessman the russian will have five days to file an appeal against the decision of the vax, so the story is not over, and it is not clear how far boyaryntseva, who was you, too, was arrested, as if on suspicion of cooperation with russia . we sent a ticket and went to

volodymyr, because russia is not autarchy , it is not the soviet union. yevtushenko more than a poet at times, well, we hope that at least the poets there will somehow still have an influence, but on your mr. viktor , were there fragments of the power and past people who, well, now dare to at least at least take such actions ? ee i think yes and this is the future of russia this is one of the future persons because he is next to tyrants yes there are always eh in russia there are still people next to mykola the second the second was eh herzen next to stalin was solzhenitsyn so it will be thank you very much viktor boborenko volodymyr sydorko political scientist a political expert will be with us. thank you very much for joining. thank you for a good conversation. take care and i wish you a good day. well, you know, as a poet, i have special feelings for these people. well, let them be really good, not that there are good russians, those who love their country. let them they say and let putin die take care of yourself be careful of stress goodbye congratulations i ask