e with voznesensky yevtushenka and company, so the comparison is later. mm.r, of course, at the end of the fifties, it began to be published and vtushenko was read, as well. by the way, i left a successful article events. they told me they corresponded about this and listened. well, in general, it is, yes it is yes indeed it was so much more appreciated. as a matter of fact, three things, firstly, the so-called courage, that is, to say that the other still, for censorship for other editorial reasons, did not dare to say, for example, for the first time i forgave gumilyov , who then loved me very much, naming . he said the same as one old poet said and then it was so fashionable. i remember the collection of the institute of slavic studies of protein studies, where in the note two remarkable authors, vyacheslavovich ivanovna nikolaevich toporov, are both deceased now, uh, gave a new window and another footnote. and there it was. as you say, and as said for nonsense for failures for loss. his dear and for the fact that it could be otherwise for the fact that th

and at that time, at the age of 55, he made his debut together, uh, with the voznesensky yevtushenka o the comparison is later than them. mm. even later than them, of course, in the late fifties. voznesensky began to publish and vtushenko read a successful article. article. she became an event to me and they talked, m-m corresponded, so they listened about it. well, in general, it is, yes it is. yes . indeed, it was so much more appreciated. actually, three things. uh, first of all, the so-called courage. that is to say, that the other still, for censorship editorial and other reasons, did not dare to say , for example, for the first time i quoted gumilyov, whom i then loved very much without naming him. she said that as one old poet said and then it was so fashionable. i remember the collection of the institute of slavic studies of protein studies, where in the note there are two wonderful co-speakers vyacheslavvich ivanov vladimir nikolaevich toporov, both deceased now, uh, gave a footnote, and there was another footnote to the footnote and there uh was as you say, and as it was sai