vti projects. civil society organizations in cooperation with representatives of other sectors.on. the award emphasizes the importance of shared values, around which we unite. responsibility award 2023. 10 finalists, three nominations, local, all-ukrainian and international level. financial grapevine. authoritative members of the jury.

vti projects. civil society organizations in cooperation with representatives of other sectors. responsibility is interaction. premium emphasizes the importance of common values ​​around which we unite. responsibility award 2023. 10 finalists, three nominations, local, all-ukrainian and international level. financial reward. authoritative members of the jury. find out the details and fill out the questionnaire. by qr code. share stories of responsible partnerships. be a part of history. kanal spresso and ukrainian pen present their own title project with myroslava barchuk. a series of conversations with ukrainian and western intellectuals who analyze and comment on the most relevant issues public discussions. what news will be analyzed by the guests of the project this week, and actually, who will be the guest of the studio? we will find out already this sunday. undoubtedly, the topics will be relevant, the guests - special. proper names with myroslava barchuk. sunday: 17:10 at espresso. dear friends, we are coming back, and now we will talk about... about the new, new year, now

release o the claims against them r the safe injuries to avoid the value destroying victim against vti and raced to the courthouse that would result in no recovery of her virtually a accept the united ste at that unrebutted finding grounded in a massive record built on years of creditor viim led efforts refused to the trustees 11th hour speculatn of some magic alternative permitting and equitable recovery. that is why the factfinder relied on secon123 b6 as broad a term to approve the lee and is essential to restructurg e relationship in this case on whichhe lives telly depend. welcome the clients questions. >> what would be the differen between if ty d gone through bankruptcy and discharge or reached an agreement? how whatt looked different from the release? >> i gue i is a hypothetical on mtie levels because one isn't clear that they are eligible for bankruptcy, b if they did do that,he are a lot of questions thatou need to be answered including dozens of different bankruptcies and you would have aree-for-all in competition of reconciling those assets. itould take years probably deca

weav a highly negotiated tailored release the vti needs to g compensation that is safeguarded by allhe appropriateness factors that judges in the common-law fashion and best. >> justice jackson? >> my concern about the dramatic presentation is thinking about those circui tt d not commit third-party nonessential releases. and i thin i i agree with you or believe your forecastbo what is supposed to happen or what might happen inhi situation that they would never be a settlementfhe cases arising in those circuits and the government has given several examples here of situa in which once there is rejection to take care o this party tt so how do you explain that if you are rht about what is likely to happen in this situation? >> two things. et's not my forecast it's the bankruptcy forecast. tet me answer directly. the example i heard today is the example out of the nth circuit. that had a far smaller body of claimants if you look at the actual bankruptcies where you have nothing near theunds available like here we have $1.8 billion in the estate and $40 trillion of claims. those breast imp