wade framework and republicans really only had to point to roe v.ade and say that this is what we oppose they were under pressure to come up with their own abortion laws or policies because they were hemmed in by roe v. wade, now that that's gone democrats are not being forced to talk about mini support abortion up to the final month of pregnancy which is not supported publicly by the vast majority of americans and it's now on republicans to lay out restrictions and in the having to do a lot of discussions i have ever done in years. >> you agree dobbs is one of the biggest stories what the republicans need to do to stop this issue been a potentially significant label for them. >> sarah put her finger on it one of the most important things talking about the fact that so many of the democrats who like to make a political issue out of this do support abortion to the point of birth which is far out of the mainstream of normal americans. i think it's interesting judicial speaking the dobbs decision overturned one of the most extraordinary overreaches by

now just for roe versus wade when the decision comes out its a question, what do you think is possible, what's realistic on affirmative action and the legislative cycle? >> we can all read the writing on the wall. i haven't parsed justice roberts for justice ro kavanaugh's jurisprudence but we can see where they're all going . i don't know where waterford is on it but i can see where they're allgoing . so look, my mind it's a very practical question of how the admissions offices operate. and how they read applications. i have too much faith in the good common sense of the american people in our institutions which don't want a right wing supreme court dictating to everybody there admissions policies. who's going to get to go to georgetown law school andgewho is not . but i haven't worked h specifically on this problem since the new court was formed. so i'd be interested to read some articles about what people are saying . but i find it very unlikely that they're not going to come back and uphold the banner of colorblindness despite the fact that it's got nothing to do with original is i

wade. but mark, even more to your point, i'm looking at where the justices sought to land their originalism, kind of skipping around history. what's notable is that they never landed on the reconstructionist, right? and that is to say, those justices that offered the 13th amendment, 14th amendment, and 15th amendment that abolished slavery and involuntary servitude. and the reason that ends up being important is because those authors of that -- of the 13th amendment, the 14th a moment, the 15th amendment, those framers, former's of amendments, led the way by talking about the involuntary reproductive servitude of black women. so this idea that there had never been amongst framers, the framers when founders -- was inaccurate. charles sumner was nearly beaten to death. several days after giving a speech about black women being raped, black girls being raped, and being subjected to involuntary motherhood. there's a whole record about that. so i appreciate you mentioning that. i think it just f

wade. and even before that, dating back to 1942, and the decision in center of the oklahoma. it would be possible -- as being the nature and direction that the court was always leaning into. which is actually not accurate. roe v. wade itself was a seven-to opinion. five of those seven justices were republican appointed. 30 years before roe v. wade, in another case, it was 9-0. the supreme court used the language of human rights and civil-rights rights to describe individual autonomy, privacy and dignity, in being able to determine their own reproductive future. that was a case involving a man. he was seeking to -- when the state was trying to interfere with his reproductive destiny. but it is worth noting the author of that decision, justice douglas, was also the other of bridge v. connecticut, striking down a connecticut law that prohibited contraception for married couples. the reason why that ends up being significant for a law, is i think it exposes the insincerity -- really, the lie of

is much as a ted make it public incredibly go to congress to say row v wade people actually fell forhat or pretended it was so obvious what was going on so do i think they will change their mind with the wins of publicl opinion? they will be vindicated and celebrated by the federalist society in gop turning themselves into martyrs because people picketing at the supreme court they don't care about people with those path to get healthcare but it's any event that is not tomagical thinking for them to change their mind. >> justice roberts does seem to care about the legitimacy of the court be he is already lost to them so maybe you could pull him over. but that still leaves a five / four court. so there are people who love to refute the idea the majority very in popular democracy. i filibustered you into oblivion thank you so much for having me. [laughter] >> i just want to say for all of us from january 6 so can you talk of what happened yesterday what would happen. >> we knew the committee would end at the end of congress all select committees expire at the end. that we areth going to

people don't want to be abolished two thirds of the american people wanted to overturn roe v wade butn the other hand more than two thirds of the american people and 75 percent in the third trimester so limitations on abortion with a certain number of exceptions for rape and incest and that's what word largely support that in many parts of the nation. paul: a great biting come back. >> i feel it. and giving a jolt of momentum real clear politics have reaching the job approval bring it 43.4 percent this morning a one.3 percent increase i feel it every moment of the day. >> so look at what has happened before the election the democrats were mumbling this is why he can't run we will lose and then governor newsom bows out he won't run against biden and biden in the white house talking about they will announce it in the new year so does not salvage his presidency? >> it scared off some early contenders but i have to give compliments this is beautifully done. strong support for the agenda has brought him support. remember ohio strong support for the agenda amend mike the wine got reelected

the laws like roe v wade? i do think there has been a lot of progress and, again, the way that women have beenjust, like, absolutely towering over everyone in this industry right now is so exciting to me and itjust makes me feel really, really hopeful and inspired. and it's not only women doing one thing, it's women doing all kinds of different things and looking different and acting different and having different styles and different... just, like, ijust love it so much. there's such a range right now and it's so nice to see and it's just so... it's just refreshing. i don't know. it's new. it's never been like that and it's just really... ..it's exciting and it's really cool to be a part of it, so... so, you're hopeful? i'm hopeful — very hopeful. thank you so much for giving us so much of your time. yeah! of course! i really appreciate it. # i don't relate to you. # i don't relate to you, no. # cos i'd never treat me this... # you made me hate this city. # and i don't talk about you on the internet. # never

clarence the supreme courtjustices clarence thomas who was in favour of roe v wade being overturneding opinion that other privacy based rights such as same sex marriage could be reconsidered and so that caused democrats to move swiftly to try to codify same sex marriage and so now they have done it and so now they have done it and the important thing to note here is that it got bipartisan support, it got majority support, it got majority support in the house and the senate by both parties and that is really important, it is really significant because it shows just how much views have changed culturally on an issue such as same—sex marriage which was 0nce such as same—sex marriage which was once upon a time really, really contentious. the other thing to point out here is that this is likely going to be the last significant legislative accomplishment that the house democrats make before the house republicans take over next year. at last month's cop27 climate summit in egypt, activists and international bodies called for a greater drive to protect and use coastal wetlands, to capture c

wade, the rollback of roe v. wade, their brand stays tarnished. you have to interlock the two of them. >> while some of these things seem obvious to us now as we talk about roe v. wade, it's shocking that americans would respond as overwhelmingly as they did if you looked at polls, if you looked at where the republican party was, if you looked where swing voters were. it's very surprising looking back to see just how dramatic the backlash was. our last brand up, brand down of this segment -- >> global. >> -- is global. if you go back a year, it's very safe to say literally nobody would have seen this coming, even ukraines, vladimir putin brand way down, zelenskyy brand up. nobody could have imagined when the tanks started rolling in and people believes the ukrainians would collapse in three, four, five days. nobody would believe at the end of the year we would be talking, and this is where the arrows would be pointing in a really dramatic, historic way, donny. >> not just president putin. really unearthed and tooked the focus off russia in terms o

wade. what is it going to take for institutionalists to realize that institutions can't protect us if we don't stand up and do what is necessary to rebuild them? >> is expanding the court the only way? one could argue you need to have a focus on the federal courts. if one of my former colleagues were listening, they would say this president has focused on the federal courts and put more like women in the federal courts then those before. >> you have to be staffing being afraid of criticizing. >> he felt the heat. >> the reality is that the house is on fire and court expansion is a little bit of the water that is going to put out the fire. we have to understand that roe is the floor. people keep saying wait. >> i would like to note that the chairman does not condone that. >> as the third branch of the government, this is about checks and balances and it is out of balance. it provides more balance and we could have term limits. the fact that people can be on that for a lifetime. you waited to

wade. what this says about our society today.t's called the newday 100 because it lets veterans borrow up to 100% of their home's value. not just 80% like some typical loans. that extra cash can make a huge difference in these times of skyrocketing prices. here's more good news: home values have skyrocketed too. that means even more cash! take out an average of $60,000 to pay down your high-rate credit card debt, consolidate your second mortgage, personal loans, and car loans, and lower your payments by $600 every month. best of all, there are absolutely no upfront out-of-pocket costs with this loan. and even if you have credit concerns, give us a call. the va has granted newday automatic authority to make our own approval decisions. when lenders say no to a veteran, newday can say yes. so how many vaccines have you given to people? me? about 1000. walgreens...millions. no way can i miss her big debut. with your booster, i think you'll be there. for every twirl. i got a shot so my sister won't get sick. way to go, big bro! so whi

wade, the rollback roe v. wade, their brand stays tarnish.u kind of have to interlocked to them. >> i've got to say, there are, well some of these things seem obvious to us now as we talk about roe v. wade, it is shocking that americans would respond as overwhelmingly as they did. if you look at polls, if you look at where the republican party was, if you looked swing voters were, it is very surprising looking back to see just how dramatic the backlash. was our last friend, branden of the segment. is global. and if you go back a year, it is very safe to say literally nobody would have seen this coming. even ukrainians. vladimir putin, brand way down. so lewinsky, brand way up. nobody could've imagined when those tanks started rolling in and people believed that ukrainians would collapse in three, four, five days. nobody would believe that at the end of the year we would be talking and this is where the arrows would be pointing. in a really dramatic historic way, donny. >> yeah, not only just putin. it really shows it under earth and took the

wade. what is it going to take for institutional to realize institutions can't protect us if we don't stand up and do what's necessary to rebuild them? >> expanding the court is the only way? you could argue you have to have a focus on federal courts. one of my former colleagues was sitting here listening to this panel, they would say this president has made a focus on the federal courts. put more black women on the federal courts than any present before him, including -- >> say it. >> brock obama. >> absolutely. >> y'all gotta be -- y'all gotta stop being scared to criticize. i'm not a flame thrower. he felt that he. >> the reality is the houses on fire. court expansion is a little bit of the why are smoking up the fire. we have to understand that roe v. wade was the floor. that was the floor. this court keeps playing in our faces. people are telling us, just wait and see. they will die soon. no, they don't. they don't die. look at mitch mcconnell. >> i would like to know nor the chairman

wade as a law. this did not stop him or his supporters from lobbying specific justices, urging them to undermine women's access to basic medical care. these efforts, whether through private group of prayer sessions, intimate dinners, or lavish trips, ultimately bore fruit when justice alito delivered his decision overturning roe v. wade and putting women's health care across the country in peril. we are now left wondering how much of this decision is bending decades of established precedent and was influenced by the organized wealthy donors and lobbying to move conservative justices to the right. to be clear, known no one in the story, neither reverend shank, broke the rules. that is the problem. the supreme court was subject to a code of ethics like the rest of the federal judiciary, like the legislative and executive branches. they would need to follow basic financial disclosure reporting, rules and refusal guidelines. they would need to ask themselves what every employee of congress, of the white

wade decision. >> i'm sure we will use that word quite a bit. lgbtqia?this is another interesting one, and i can understand why people look this up. dictionaries measure our curiosity as much as the culture and news, and we are familiar with lgbt, but these other letters, we have to consult and look them up for ourselves. i want to make sure i get them for you correct. these other initials stand for intersex and asexual. >> i also like this one because i know it. loamy. i played the new york times spelling game. >> wargames have become a thing in 2022, and i think that is great. it is great for word lovers. particularly five letter words for mortal -- wordle, people tell me they have to have the discipline to not look in the dictionary to play the games fairly, but people have to check if these are real words. >> real quick because we are running out of time, the last five years, you have pandemic and vaccine. now we are starting to move out of that. do you find that the annual reveal is something people look forward to? >> absolutely because it tells us

wade, they're brand stays tarnish. interlock the tw of them. >> i have to say there are - some of these things see obvious to us as we talk about roe v. wade. it is shocking that american would respond as overwhelmingl as they did. if you look at polls, if you look at where the republican party was, if you look where swing voters were, it is ver surprising looking back to see just how dramatic the backlash was. our last brand aung is - it's very safe to say that literally no one would hav seen this coming vladimir putin, brand way down zelenskyy, brand way up. no one would have imagined whe the tank started rolling in an people believe the ukrainian would collapse in three, four, five days. no one would believe that at the end of the year we would b talking and this is where th arrows will be pointed a really dramatic historical way. >> yeah, not only putin, i really unearthed and took th close off russia as far as not being the superpower it's a third world country and so many ways if they would choose size to b getti

wade in the nation. [applause] that came about through prayer and because of faithful pastors who were preaching. we were very effective. i want to put up the first light. so effective were christians in going to the polls, that people turned out in the 2016 election. they were very sharp hillary clinton. 91% of people who were spiritually active turned out and they gave a chance to donald trump in that election, primarily because of the supreme court appointments. in 2016, 60% of the general public turned out. 91% or 9% of the american population got out and voted. we have the result of overturning roe v. wade this last year because of that election. in 2020, we saw again those who were spiritually active, governmentally engaged, turned out. 97 percent voted for donald trump. his vote totals went up with those who were spiritually active and governmentally engaged. when that happened in 2016, there was a decision made by the progressive left that this would never happen again. they started this effort t

wade? this is settled now. by the supreme court.at there wasn't a need for this legislation. but now that you see that the supreme court may be capable of anything, is that what really drove this passage? >> without question it is the dobbs decision of overturning roe v. wade that drove the passage of the respect for marriage act. i think that we believe that the 2015 decision declaring marriage equality the law of the land was well settled precedent by this point. but when you see the supreme court set half of america back a second class citizens after 49 years of precedent in roe v. wade, and by the way, the and constitutional underpinnings that led to roe v. wade are strikingly similar to the ones that underlay the loving versus agenda in virginia case declaring that states could not ban interracial marriage, and the other decision saying states could not bar same sex marriage. so peter people were worried, very frightened at the marriages that they rely on might not be considered valid in the future. and then the supreme, one ju

wade had been overturned, i was very happy to hear that. ruby gravrok is a devout catholic, and a third year medical school student in la crosse, wisconsin. >> my faith is the most important thing to me, and it does impact every aspect of my life. and obviously, medicine is going to be a very large part of that life. reporter: 23-year-old ruby is considering becoming an obgyn, but her residency would require training in abortion, a procedure she's firmly against. >> what kind of doctor would i be, if i chose to intentionally kill one of my patients? reporter: the accreditation council, responsible for graduate medical training programs, still requires all residents get abortion training, but that residents who have a religious or moral objection may opt out. reporter: the council states that, "we feel that abortion or evacuating the uterus is a core procedure for obgyn," it's also used for management of miscarriages and complications of pregnancy, like infection and bleeding. so, it's a technique that has to be learned. >> that is not an in

wade. social media does not always mean serious, though.re was one viral trend which swept the world, wordle. the word game allowed users to share their timelines flooded with green squares. are there more interest or wheels in the world? a straightforward question which sparked thousands of debates. >> we have bikes, motorcycles, 18 wheelers. >> drawing responses from brands, celebrities, and late night tv. >> emory to find anyone who says doors. >> this is very good. i'm glad we agree. >> team wheels. m glad we i have to disagree wi, jimmy. we are teamed or. >> solid. just added to the list of age-old to bates. is that dress gold or blue? that one will blow my mind. >> you are watching 2022 headlines, highlights, and history. g 2022 headlines, highlights, and history. history. era. and i wanted to hide from the world. for years, i thought my t.e.d was beyond help... ...but then i asked my doctor about tepezza. (vo) tepezza is the only medicine that treats t.e.d. at the source not just the symptoms. in a clinical study, more than 8 out of

wade.toric gas prices and russian's invasion of ukraine and we know in 2023 there will be much to cover in a year of divided government. we have four newsroom reports from the nation's top outlets. with me here at the table, elisabeth bumiller. she is the assistant managing editor and the washington bureau chief at "the new york times." fin gomez is the political director for pbs news. terence samuel is at npr and vanessa williams, editor at the "washington post." let's start with the balance of power in washington in 2023. the mid terms left the democrats with a slim majority in the senate and in the hou republicans have their own slim majority and the speaker's gavel. here's republican minority leader kevin mccarthy, who is expected to become speaker after the november elections. >> i'm proud to announce the era of one-party democrat rule in washington is over. washington now has a check and balance and this new republican leadership team is ready to goat america back on the right track.

wade. what is it going to take for institutionalist to realize that institutions can protect us if we don't stand up and do what is necessary to rebuild them? >> tamora, is expanding the court the only way? one could argue that you have to have a focus on federal courts. one of my former colleagues was sitting here, listening to this panel, they'd say that this president has made a focus on the federal courts. put more black women on the federal courts in any president before him, including -- >> say it. say it. >> barack obama. >> absolutely. >> y'all need to stop being scared to criticize. >> ain't nobody scared, roland. >> i'm scared. >> i ain't a flame thrower but he built that he. >> the reality is, the house is on fire. court expansion is a little bit of the water that's going to put out the fire. we have to understand that roe was the floor. that was the floor. this court keeps playing in our faces, people are saying, just wait and see. they're going to dyson. no they don't, they don

wade. bay area couples say the new bill offers a bit of relief for same-sex couples. >> oh, it's a huge victory. i mean, it's like groundbreaking, you know. it's like everything that i've ever wanted, you know, in my life. >> joining us now is a constitutional law professor at u.c. davis. professor, nice to have you back on the program. can you explain what this exactly means today for same-sex marriages? >> sure. what congress did is it passed a law that said that states are obliged to recognize same-sex marriages from other states. as a result, if the supreme court overturns the obergefell case that authorized same-sex marriage throughout the country, that will still protect it across the country. if one state bans it, the couple can go to another state that authorizes it and it will be recognized in their home state. >> if i get married in california, i can move to alabama or another state that doesn't acknowledge it, and still i will be protected on a federal level. is that correct? >>

wade., though there was one viral tren sweeping the world, wordle the daily were dame allow user to share their triumphs, resulting in timelines flooded with yellow and green squares. moving on, are there more door or wheels in the world a straightforward question tha sparked thousands of debates >> we've got bikes, motorcycles, 18 wheelers. >> john in responses fro brands, celebrities, and eve late night tv. >> i'm ready to fight anyone who says doors >> all right, this is very good we are team wields >> yeah, i'm glad we agree >> team wheels >> got to disagree with you, jimmy. we were still team doors >> definitely, solid evidence. all right, but just added to the list of age-old debate like, is that dress gold o blue that one blew my mind. >> you are watching 2022 headlines, highlights, and history. history. the rent-a-car industry is the definition of boring. and the reason can be found in the name itself. rent - a - car. you don't want a friend. you want the friend. you don't want a jo

a supreme court justice clarence thomas after the overturning of roe v wade one year after they were married at san francisco city hall. and weighing intensive job as we're back to the 4th floor to renew their vows, making a statement of love friday after 5 supreme court justices voted to overturn roe v wade the summer justice thomas put in his concurring opinion that it was time to also reconsider same marriage. >> couples like us became very nervous. what a great day. the couple were relieved when the u.s. senate voted. 61 to 36 to pass the respect for marriage act, protecting marriage equality at a federal level. 7 years after the supreme court upheld the right to same marriage. we thought it was really worth celebrating to know that our marriage was going to be protected and so many other marriages like ours throughout this country. the couple asked senator alex padilla to officiate their ceremony at city hall. i the newly elected senator agreed without hesitation and says he's committed to continuing the fight to ensure equality under the law. >> the best protection that we coul

when it ruled v wade was overturned at the time one of the supreme courtjustices clarence thomas who his concurring opinion that other privacy based rights such as same—sex marriage could be reconsidered. that cause democrats to move swiftly to try and codify same—sex marriage. now they have done it. the important thing to note here it got bipartisan support. he got majority support in the house and the senate by both parties. and that's really important and significant it showsjust how much important and significant it shows just how much views have changed culturally. 0n shows just how much views have changed culturally. on an issue such as same—sex marriage which was 0nce such as same—sex marriage which was once upon a time really contentious. the other thing to point out here is this is likely going to be the last significant legislative accomplishment that the house democrats meets before house republicans take over next year. the canadian singer celine dion has revealed she has been diagnosed with a rate auto—immune with a rare auto—immune disease, known as stiff person syndrom

you correctly predicted that roe versus wade would be overturned in 2022.ou did that on this panel. it was still a shock for the country, though. >> right. >> so, what's ahead for the court in 2023? what do you need to warn us about in terms of impact? >> well, i think that, you know, last term we got a pretty clear picture of what the supreme court is, six justices, largely psix conservative justices, willing to look at all swaths of the law, including abortion rights, gun rights, religion. we saw them, of course, overturn roe versus wade, expand gun rights, expand religious expression. normally when you cover the court, they'll have a big term and then they have a quiet term. that's not the case with this supreme court this year. they have several cases that stand to be very controversial, including affirmative action. i expect, and i guess i can just say my prediction now, i expect this court to overturn the use of affirmative action in college admissions. that i think will have a significant impact on political discourse that we saw last year with women

wade.ry time they are in public, they are pariahs. after this exchange went viral on social media and alexandra cara bio responded, she was caught off guard by question like this. if you are going to be a hypocrite who advocates violence online, you probably should do it testifying in my committee. >> todd: i think you are onto something and you highlighted two things the one the fact this individual was not vetted from their tweets and this individual was surprised that she receive that line of questioning. that goes to a pure issue and i'm glad you pointed to the outcome of the left thinks they are completely justified and no words that they use have any consequences, but only those on the right have consequences to their words. and that is why what nancy mace did is crucial at the top pointing out this hypocrisy. >> carley: also nancy mace said january 5th, she was accosted by a constituent and one of her constituents in washington, d.c., so she carries a gun wherever she goes. her point

wade and we will not be the state that bans abortion. [audience cheering] we have work to do, though. - opponents wasted no time trying to overturn the law. - no, no, roe v. wade has got to go. - we have been going backwards in texas. women are losing their rights instead of gaining them. - we say fight back. [audience cheering] - these laws are simply about stopping women from accessing their constitutionally protected right to abortion. - whose body, whose choice? - my body, my choice. - whose body, whose choice? - we've seen countless attacks on abortion access and reproductive justice in our communities. - in this state where things have been awfully hard for an awfully long time, it's pretty understandable that sometimes we've succumbed to the idea that our voices just don't matter, but we have shown that we have the courage to rise up against what we know to be wrong. on june 25th, 2013, to be exact, you all did something remarkable. and for at least a moment, you understood your own power. [audience cheering] [audience cheering] t

wade.of states that still have bans on same sex marriage on their books. it is either a -- or constitutional amendment. obergefell goes, away suddenly marriage is no longer legal in 35 states. but the weather respect for marriage act does is it says that those states must recognize those marriages. unfortunately if, say, my husband and i moved back to north dakota where they do not have same-sex marriage it is not legal on the books in terms of law and constitutional amendment, if we had friends who lived there they would have to leave the state, come to washington or go to new york, where you are, to get married. and then returned home and have the state recognize their marriage. it is unfair financial burden it is also ridiculous. >> it is ridiculous and it is a basic right. a little seven the right direction i'm glad you pointed out the shortcomings, my friend. jonathan kaye part is the host of the sunday show and stay tuned right after velshi's the sunday show starts at 10 am eastern. h