over and over arching wadebridge and thematic report has proved a senior level within the pearson eye because. the conclusions would have been just to cut a stroke it would have a sensibly made the case and in fact it would have amounted to a state recognition and confirmation that collusion existed within the security forces in this particular sector in the conflict and i suppose politically for many many other reasons not was just too long comfortable for many people on for the british government that meant a pulling out of the overarching report on not really is just acceptable for the focus. one of the fundamental elements of my overall to report would have been for this question to be almost how is it that a group of place offices. know that they can go back to a farm where there is a bomb in a car having been on the surveillance and yet they know they can go back the following day. and the bomb goes off will drive them the confidence that they were not going to be apprehended there and then. or some lights a stage for me that is the biggest question that needs to be answered wer