waggon: with alimate aptationlan, y have a t system a a dry stem, so wheyou neeto liftater ou you cado that, t when yoneneed to t the war r in, you can t t the ter r in throughhat syst i into esese canals andirircula it arou the city. willmms: imeanan, me peoeole ghght wa pasastere anan think, "oh, yeah.t't'justst orgrownwn ass." no. it's a w-w-lyi eea th hasas ctain vegetatioinin it at i is e perfecvevegetaon w wheyou wat water a absorand d be able to dissipe e at aore graduararate. meanan, doesns't look like lolot ofnattur science,utut the's a lot of natur s scien thahat es intnt it waggoner:ososts ls toto he green infrtrtructu bececau is is l-maintence. ths is a aodel of part of the city as the mn n draige b bas. you have aunundergund d syem, the white lis s undethee earth. e e ideaas t to t thee water into esese pis, t to t th w watero ththespumps s d pusitit outthatat w the meodod. lliams: truth ofhehe matr isthere iso way toololve o water isss s withust t ou pumps a t turbis. it's nonot enou. it wi never b enugh. waggner: you know, decades o doing the wrong thg usuall kill yo we

court of appeals judgments simultaneously with no supreme court able to resolve that and kristen waggoner with the conservative alliance defending freedom is hopeful that there are 9 justices when she argues her case on college campus free speech in january if they're only 8 justices on the court and there's a tie for example on the court. >>then what that means is whatever the lower court ruling wise that ruling stands berets confirmation hearings are set to begin on october 12th. >>in washington, i'm anna warren, a key. >>alexandra le mon in washington coming up, i'll tell you why it will likely be difficult for another coronavirus relief package to be approved. all right, let's head outside and check in on conditions outside your door looks pretty good here across the golden gate heads up for some road construction that's wrapping up in the north bay, it's causing a bit of a slowdown for people entering sausalito so south lows right around spencer they're running traffic breaks holding everyone bag looks like i finally see some cars here heading into san francisco so be prepared for th

many respects might comes to their litigation and a new phase i think we see a lot more is kristen waggoneru may know the name for cheap successfully argued the case. she has a petition between the army with washington involving same-sex weddings. she also has another petition in a disclosure requirement t case. so keep your eyes on those lawyers when it comes to first amendment in terms of the supreme court litigation. with that i'm happy to turn over to my colleague. >> thanks ron. thank you so much for the opportunity to participate in this project with you. many thanks to cato. i want to talk about three things when it comes to roberts court in the first amendment. those are category contact and content. those are all important a in first amendment methodologies. the first point is category.e one way we determine whether speech is protected by the first amendment is to determine if it falls into an unprotected category of speech. for example the u.s. supreme court recognized the exception in 1957. plate recognized the fighting words exception in 1942 in new hampshire. and it recognized

respects when it comes to their litigation and a new face, i think they seem a lot more is tristan waggoner. you may know the name. she successor successfully argued the cake shop case, she has asserted position before the court, eileen south of washington who worked in same-sex weddings and she has another vacation in a disclosure of the crimes case so keep your eyes of those lawyer when it comes to the first amendment in terms of supreme court litigation and with on happy to turn it over to my colleague . >> and thank you so much for the opportunity to participate in this project with you and many thanks to cato. i want to talk about readings when it comes to the roberts court in the first amendment and those are category, context and content and those are all important in first amendment methodology. the first point of category, one way we determine whether speech is protected by the first amendment is to determine whether falls into an unprotected category of speech. for example the us supreme court recognized the obscenity exception in 1957 and recognized the fighting words exception i