i am with the wagner llp. i represent the appellants in this appeal. i have raised two issues with regard to notice. there is the ability to move forward on the merits. various committees of the board have heard the substantive merits of the project. with regards to notice, on june 1, just six days ago and just four business days ago, we were provided with a staff report and other substantive materials in support of project approval and the eir in the form of responses to the appeal document here. the planning and zoning law requires a 10-day notice of substantive materials and information regarding any project that would amend a general plan of zoning. the relevant case is on the environmental defense project. also, under the california environmental quality act, commissioners will proceed with any challenge by the board would normally be limited to only those issues that are raised before the close of the public hearing on the project. that provision also states that if be notice provided by law is god-given or an opportunity to organize or respond t