saudis like to say there is no such thing as wahabism, it's salifism,, it simply means being back to the basics, back to the beginning of islam, and that's what we are promoting, but whatever you call it, it is a very conservative philosophy of islam. >> rose: and a political force. >> and a political force, because the only people who can organize anything in the country aside from the government are the religious. >> rose: as you know, "60 minutes" did a piece about the 28 pages missing from the 9/11 commission report and has never been declassified. there is a real effort and former senator graham from florida has said there is something in there and he would not be surprised if it shows some kind of support for those al quaida kids who came here and got on the planes and did what they did on 9/11, that there was some kind of a saudi support. they don't say government, but some kind of a saudi support for them. you tell me how the saudis view that? because my understanding is they're in favor of the release of the 22 pages. >> prince bandar who as you know was the ambassador for m

the role, in general, that saudi arabia has played and the royal family has played in supporting wahabism which is the extreme right-wing movement which is part of what isis and al qaeda are about. >> and finally, senator, on friday, you released last year's tax returns. secretary clinton has posted her tax returns from the past eight years. so will you do the same? >> we will post more of them, yes, we will. i don't have, to be honest with you, our tax returns showed us that we made more money -- we made less money in a given year than secretary clinton made in one speech. we don't have a bunch of -- jane and i don't have a bunch of accountants working for us. we will get it out. i think we have all that information, and we will get them out as soon as we can. >> by when? >> which will be very soon. we got out one. we'll get out more. >> like this week? >> probably. >> okay. senator, thank you so much for your time. appreciate it. good to talk to you. >> thank you, dana. >>> and coming up, there are 95 republican delegates at stake on tuesday when new york votes. could trump sweep them a

we haven't talked about wahabism, we haven't talked about their invention of an extreme form of islam is exported around and is the intellectual basis of these centers and intellectual basis. they need to get the caliph through the middle east. that's something we can't control just like we can't control the arab spring. >> it's a period of day turmoil but it's not clear that the united states could or should have reacted dramatically differently whether it would have been deeply successful. you got a bunch of sclerotic tyrannies not providing any good for their citizens and ultimately you had revolutions in these places. they haven't done particularly well, a lot of turmoil someone wrote a book about the j curve on you things often go down before they come back up. youity a lot of turmoil there and ones like saudi arabia that didn't have the turmoil have stayed sclerotic tyrannies and reforming which they aren't going to be anything they can do. so u.s. has tried whether invading and occupying whether inviting or not occupying or giving aid, they have the same outcome which is turmoi

made a deal with the devil early on when saudi arabia was first formed and they support a strain of wahabismd they have to cut off the funding for that. i understand that. if you want to talk to them, you have the talk to them in private. don't go in front of cameras and beat them up publicly. do it in a proper way. i served on the armed services committee for 18 years and i went all the way from seeing reagan build up the military, the berlin wall falling, all the way to the coalition to push saddam out of kuwait and i was there after 9/11 in the pentagon, in and out for two or three years helping to solve some of the problems that they had there. when you get foreign policy experience, you kind of learn how the world works, the way you conduct yourself, how you put your team together. but sometimes, we have too much talk, and we have something serious to say about somebody who we could consider to be a really strong ally. we can do it quietly to get started. that's what i would do. same thing with israel. something we don't like about them, we don't need to go out there and start beating t

however, as i just laid out, there was saudi fundraising, saudi support for wahabism also supported,said on the television, no way the two terrorists that helped pull off the attacks could have gone into southern california and san diego and los angeles without help ahead of time. somebody from the saudi consulate in los angeles that we saw doing a lot of things allegedly helping terrorist. >> ambassador, thank you. tim roemer, given that answer, i'm just curious, how do you narrow the focus. we should be able to move forward with these. you can't narrow the focus. >> there's a difference between going back in history between the saudi government official act and rogue elements and i think there's quite likely there were, could have been a royal, function in the government, someone with a foundation and a big pot of money and that probably was true. i think going forward we do have a big problem with saudi arabia. we are not on the same page on the issue, whether yemen, syria, what to do about iran or middle east. we call our selves allies, we call our self partners, we are not. they