nasr al-taqqlim wajib aqab wajib fasadat in every rak'ah in palestine, especially in the oppressed gaza , and also with our brothers in the south of lebanon , with those who are overthrown, i reckon with the displaced. ali minhaji abu bakr al-siddiq, umar wa othman, ali wa abu obeidah bin jarrah and aqiblid in today's world, i will continue with a report from africa . the authorities of zimbabwe expelled the staff of the united states agency for international development from their country . zimbabwean government officials had announced. we know that the united states has accused zimbabwean officials of corruption and rights violations. he has been accused of taking gold and diamonds from smugglers who operate in zainbaweh. he has given orders to government officials to facilitate the sale of gold and diamonds in illegal markets and to take bribes, and all of this has now caused us president joe biden to sign an executive order to extend the state of national emergency and special sanctions against the country. to establish recently, we have obtained a statement from the united states ,

right, what is wrong, beautiful or ugly , there are differences in some details, that's why sharia, wajib , haram, and religion came because human reason is to understand all the examples and especially the places where there are two good things. they are in solidarity that they don't know that this work is good, but now they have to do that work. is suicide moral or not? now, if someone puts a gun to your head and tells you that you should kill him, we will kill you. i have the right to kill him. now the moral is to save your life or to kill yourself. well, this is an easy issue. it means that we have two sides of moral philosophers to argue on both sides or not, for example, a preemptive attack on this preemptive attack, for example, so-and-so. they torture him, burn him, cut him to pieces, i don't know if he is really guilty or not , in order to get something from him, then he argues that if we didn't torture him, we wouldn't do it. rape and cruelty and so on. if not, this might really be news . if it is, then they might do something. for example , 100,000 people will be hurt. therefor

is wrong, beautiful or ugly , of course, there are differences in some details, that's why shariah, wajib, haram, and religion have come because the human mind is able to understand all the examples, especially the places where 2 good things are in harmony, which does not know that this is good now. there is no argument, it means ambiguity, for example , is suicide a moral thing or not, now someone puts a gun to your head and tells you that you have to kill yourself, if not , we will kill you, i have the right to kill him, now the morality is that you save your life or that you kill yourself. killing evil, well, this is an easy issue, that is , we have two sides, moral philosophers, to argue on both sides or not, for example, a preemptive attack, a preemptive attack, doubt, for example, they take so-and-so and torture him. they burn them to pieces, i don't know if he is really guilty or not in order to get something from him, so then he argues that if we did n't torture him, we wouldn't have done it now. if not, this might be really news. if so, then they might do something. for example,

he said it is wajib obligatory in islamic jurisprudence that you help aid , bring victory to our helpine, prepare against your enemies, military power and cavalry. it's all very modern, this stuff, isn't it? the important point here is this michael gove's definition of extremism would stop government funding taxpayers money, going to people like this. all right. the school at lewisham islamic centre, by the way, was apparently sent hundreds of thousands of pounds in government grants before it closed in 2019. but gove does nothing to actually stop them saying this stuff. all right. it doesn't do anything to actually stop the real issue, which is people being poisoned with what many people may think is radical rhetoric. again, i will stress the lewisham islamic centre. mr begg, they categorically deny engaging in radicalisation or doing anything dangerous whatsoever. they deny that wholeheartedly misses the point for me. rishi sunak and michael gove think extremism in britain has got so bad that they needed to do something about it. he stood outside downing street . stood outside downi