we want to david from walter mills -- you can go farther, way, back into some of the better 19th century stop and find plenty of stuff they can find part of the new deal military history going today. what i'm asking has the new military history lost its cash? is it time to drop that? i don't know what we call it. we got military history. to continually hard on this new military history, i do not know what that is saying to the profession anymore. is it time to take what we learned today at least into what we heard today, and say it is time to come up with something you, or drawback to simply calling it military history again. it seems to be what we are you have presented to us, what we heard from the audience is the new norm. how is it new military history? what do you think. >> i would say first and foremost, it was a ploy to get the panel accepted by the committee. which worked, we are here. saying he was always helpful. also, in a lot of ways saying you directions is action not speaking to the profession but speaking to public consumption of what military history is. and what public c