. >>>> many israelis ddon't wana know aboutut palesninians. they don't w want toto reaeach they don't wwant to cross into streets and d neighborhoodods w the paleststinians live because of a mixture of stereotypes and so on. >> so we decided to go together to visit each other's neighborhoods. and i would talk to israelis and david would talk to palestinians, and together we would face the harsh realities of our shared land. >> growing up in the 1960's, the palestinians just weren't in the head of anyone. palestinians were different. we knew we had property and it was taken away from us by force. i remember distinctly remembering that this was the wall that separated the east and west jerusalem. and this was no man's land here. >> my family lived in jerusalem for centuries. in 1948 the state was pounded, and for the palestinians this time was called the catastrophe. like many palestinians, my father and his entire family were pushed out of their ancestral home. they moved to a small apartment in east jerusalem because the city was divided into

the way to move forrd is lt's depressurize this and say we're not trying to take your guns, we just wanathings, so you can separate a lot of republicans from thet n.r.a. and g a few concrete things done. instead we'reei se a rising of passion and rage and a national frenzy oth sides over this which makes it much less likely 'll get something done. >> woodruff: this passion, this rage is very real on the part of these students. >> it's very real, it's very powerful, it will be very interesting to see the difference that it could make. i share vid's skpticism on that in part because i remember sitting with the sandy hook moms and thinking that there could be no powerful story. i sat with them a day before they failed to get the vot to stop the filibuster of a very mild measure to close the gun oophole.kground check they were not able to do that. dents. these stu i'm so impressed by them. if those moms couldn't do it an the grievds, i'm not sure that these students can. on the other hand, i ned to take issue with something you said, david, which is i agree with you thaturning thinto a cultu

he probably doesn't do as much online shopping as joe wana does. but the chief does not believe anyone has two cell phones. but -- and where the justice stand technologically does not ve any ideological resonance either. if we were to write a brief that suggested an opinion, hey, mesidant, we could really lose some friends in the case. >> we're going to turn to janice vs. american federation of state, county and municipal employees. the first time that we talked about in a preview fwaws court only granted it this fall because i feel like we've only talked about the issue in the case for the last 20 years. i'm going to turn it over to him to talk about it. >> that's exactly right. the issue in the case is whether it violates the first amendment who are not members of public employee unions to pay fees for those unions to cover the cost of collective bargaining that will benefit those nonmember employees. it does sound familiar for two rundsr -- reasons, that issue. the court seemed to have addressed that issue. it did that in a case called abud. tha