having a fried egg roll, wanton, something good. it taught me the value of working hard and what it meant to be part of a small business, a small business -- a small business, small family, and an immigrant family at that. really being impacted by the los angeles riots, when that occurred, put me on the path toward public policy and understanding what it meant to have opportunities and not have opportunities in our various communities. >> why did you choose to live in san francisco? supervisor chu: i came to the area to pursue a master's degree in public policy at the uc- berkeley school. ever since then, i fell in love with what a wonderful area the bay area is. >> what motivated your interest in politics? supervisor chu: to be frank, i never saw myself in an elected position at all. i had grown up in southern california, and during the first day of the los angeles riots, my parents had their cars stolen at gunpoint. they were left out and had to pay someone $100 to get back to chinatown. it really influenced me. we had a restauran

of those sexual magazines were dirtier, if i might use that word, sort of portraying women, um, as wanton, as maybe whores. and that was something that hugh hefner really deliberately tried to stay away from. so i situated playboy as part of the sexualization of american popular culture rather or than a part of that pornographic fringe, and i think that's something that hugh hefner was really, you know, he was trying to put himself in that category as well. really more in line with the way "esquire magazine" was in the '30s and '40s. >> yeah. and you talk about how hugh kind of looked up to esquire in aceps or sort of looked at them as something of a model might be too strong a word, but he definitely took some cues from them, it sounded like. >> be i think he did look at them as a model, i think he was copying because he was a real gap of that as he was growing up -- a real fan of that as he was growing up. he was disappointed in the way in which esquire by the early '50s had let go of some of its sexual emphasis that had made it popular in the '30s and '40s, so he wanted to redo that in

(inaudible) >> warner: when they'll be able to return will be a tough tall given allegations of wanton killings there committed by the troops of sudanese president bashir. he is already under international indictment for alleged war crimes in car fewer. yesterday the u.n. security council voted to send 4200 ethiopian peacekeepers after both sides agreed to remove their troops. sudan's u.n. envoy insisted the peace keeping resolution can only set the stage for a longer lasting agreement. >> the troops, their presence there is interim. it's temporary. it's not a final or permanent. this resolution is not a substitute to the final settlement which we hope people will work very soon. >> warner: any settlement also has to divide the oil revenues in africa's third largest oil producer. most of that resource lies in newly minted south sudan while the north has most of the country's pipelines and refining capacity. i spoke about all this yesterday with the u.s. special envoy for sudan, princeton lyman on the overlook at the state department. thank you for joining us. >> glad to be here. >> war

. >> we all wanton answer. has tried and unemployment stuck near 9%. one of the things that caught this country by surprise is first of all the quake in japan. there's a major ripple effect. the last time the federal reserve came out with projections for what would happen in the future they weren't thinking about the massive ripple effect the implications on for example car dealerships here in the united states that couldn't get the components or even the cars to sell as a result of the japan quake. another major issue gas prices. after their previous projection gas prices jumped to that $4 a gallon level and that was a major psychological hurdle, a lot of consumers pulled back their spending in other areas as a result of it. >> clearly taking a more pessimistic view of the fed. as far as just some of the numbers they had projected and revised, what are we looking at? >> originally they thought our economy was going to grow more than 3%. they pulled back on that. their new revisions say they think the economy w

in terms of wanton killing of innocent people at the hands of a dictator. so what is the cost to us of this great effort? i believe that other dictators would have seen the failure to challenge qadhafi as a complete license to act with impunity against their people in any other place. the vast majority of the protesters in these countries are simply trying out for the opportunity to live a decent life, get a job, provide for a family, have opportunities and have rights. abandoning them, i think, would have betrayed not only the people seeking democratic freedoms, but it would have abandoned the core values of our country, and i can hear now, i can hear it, some of the same people now who are complaining about the president being involved would have been the first people at the barricade complaining about why the united states didn't stand up for our values and how feckless the president was that he wasn't willing to stop a dictator from coming at these innocent people. you can hear it. everybody in the country knows that's exactly where we would be. now, wh

in terms of wanton killing of innocent people at the hands of a dictator? so what is the cost to us of this great effort? i believe that other dictators would have seen the failure to challenge gadhafi as a complete license to act with impunity against their people in any other place. the vast majority of the protesters are crying out for the opportunity to live a decent life, get a job, provide for their family and have opportunities. they have rights. abandoning them i think would have betrayed not only the people seeking democratic freedoms, but is it would have abandoned the core values of our country. i can hear now -- i can hear it. some of the same people now complaining about the president be involved would have the first people at the barricade complaining about why the united states didn't stand up for their values. how feckless the president was that he wasn't willing to stop a dictator. you can hear it. everybody in the country knows. that's exactly where we'd be. now why there and not in syria? legitimate question. there are different interests