warners was emphasizing more of a midwestern and rural and smaller urban clientele.his affects the kind of movies that the companies made. (actor) i had an original story kicking around paramount. my agent told me it was dead as a doornail. but i knew a big shot there who'd always liked me. (thomas schatz) paramount was much more likely than warners say, or fox, to adapt a literate best-seller. all right, gilles, you've got five minutes, what's your story? paramount saw its audience within this larger sense of the studio system, in terms of exhibition, had a lot to do with their product. exactly what do you recommend? james joyce? dostoyevsky? i just think a picture should say a little something. oh, a message kid. just a story won't do. you'd have turned down "gone with the wind." no, that was me. i said, "who wants to see a civil war picture?" ♪ we've got another ♪ bond to buy ♪ we've got another ♪ bond to buy ♪ the bonds we bought ♪ bought the bomb -- ♪ (narrator) the major studios may have seemed unstoppable, the first crack in the system came with world war ii.

and speaking of music and the record labels like warner the swedish music streaming company spotify is trying to reengineer its business model with to work more directly with artists global music revenue is currently at a ten year high lease near a ten year i have seventeen billion dollars should the record labels be concerned about spotify archer's the social suite gives us a latest from los angeles spotify worth thirty four billion is working with independent artists to help them pocket more of their world see it however some of the major music labels are exactly thrilled about getting shut out of the deal sony universal and warner control roughly eighty percent of the music business but it might not be that way forever over the past year spotify has signed deals with a few independent artists bypassing record labels altogether the modest deals allow the artist on to spotify is streaming platform the way it works now spawn if i pays a record label briefly fifty percent of the revenue generated by each stream the label then pays the artist anywhere from fifteen to fifty percent in rea

sandberg talked about mark warner.know if they have that kind of relationship with administration or the doj, so that will be a completely new front for them to figure out how to deal with. emily: what do you think of this issue now the justice department is taking a closer look at these companies? how much of a concern is that? michael: it is their prerogative to look into it. there is no censorship of political speech. it would be ironic if they want .o spend -- to censor speech from the conservative point of view in particular, these platforms are open and transparent, and people are getting their voices heard. all the policymakers at the hearing today are on social media every day officially and in campaigns. i think it is very obvious and clear to everyone that uses the platforms, they are open for all political parties and viewpoints. emily: sarah, the question of china came up over and over again, and it was interesting listening to sheryl sandberg's statements about china. sounded like lawmakers were trying to

s mark warner. and in yet another never before occurrence. a former president vented his frustration at the way the house is running the country. >> it's not conservative. it sure isn't normal. it's radical. it's a vision that says the protection of our power and those who back us is all that matters even when it hurts the country. >> brennan: with the two party chair, democrat tom perez and republican ronna mcdaniel. plus as football season begins and colin kaepernick makes headlines again, mark leibovich joins our panel to talk about his new book on the future of the game. all of that and plenty of political analysis coming up on "face the nation." good morning, welcome to "face the nation." at the end of an explosive week in the trump administration, we spoke with vice president mike pens at his home on the grounds of the naval observatory here in washington. we begin by asking him about the ewed and than two dozen high ranking trump administration officials who have denied writing it., yon you were lied to by michael flynn, he was fired f

and to senator warner's comments, we would be able to label that with context. but we are not necessarily as easily able to identify people who might be scripting our website. so making it look like it's an actual human or even the app make it look like an actual human performing these actions that becomes much more challenging and unclear. so in consideration of labeling and context, we need to make sure that when people see that bot label that they're assuming that everything it's not on is human. we need to make sure that there's precision and accuracy as we label those things. >> but wouldn't there be a value of identifying a fraction or potential fictitious actors? >> yeah. i mean, it's definitely an idea that we have been considering. especially this past year. it's really up to the implementation at this point. >> ms. sandberg, your comments >> this is an idea i had an opportunity to discuss with vice chairman warner yesterday and committed to working with you on it. >> thank you let me just ask you a question going forward, i think we are going to come t

in addition to library content warner brothers is producing original series for the service.called titans launching next month this is more of a nich subscription service for superhero fans it's entering a crowding mechanic. at&t warner media, plus netflix, hulu, amazon prime video among others next year disney is launching its own streaming service that will feature rival super heroes, marvel content along with disney branded shows movies film from lucas films, pixar. now, bob iger says tha will cost less than netflix and less than d.c. universe. the d.c. pricing makes it a true test whether niche top services can work and how they can marke the offerings from the acquisition. at&t ceo randall stephenson talked about the value he sees in direct to consumer distribution saying the warner brothers catalog is not put to work and the company is look in for a direct to consumer model later this year. when it comes to competition with netflix stephenson said his hbo is tiffany to netflix's wal-mart. >> thanks so much. mike is not only betting the streaming giant survives the compe

why is that bad for at&t and time warner why is that bad for comcast?the doj antitrust, they are ready to issue those civil demands if they think comcast is stepping over the line in antitrust manners with nbcu. they already hate comcast. trump particularly hates comcast, he calls it public enemy number one. that's other issues. doj doesn't like the combination, big distribution, content, they don't like it on at&t-time warner. even if at&t and time warner wins, they are still going to be under the microscope of the trump doj and they are going -- and one of the tools they will use, he essentially says it in this speech is the civil investigative demand where they launch an investigation into the company. comcast, nbcu, even though you approved in justice department under obama, conditions ran out september 1, still under the microscope by his team. at&t-time warner, even if you win at appellate division, dc court of appeals, still going to be under scrutiny by these guys, they see -- all but said it in speech, i know my sources inside doj saying that,

internet pioneer america online announced today it is buying big sprawling time warner, creating the's largest media conglomerate. >> the aol-time warner merger was the classic dotcom insanity. >> $160 billion. the biggest corporate takeover ever. >> this merger will launch the next internet revolution. >> the merger of time warner and aol wasn't really a merger. it was a purchase. >> i am struck by this image today of the upstart aol gobbling up this media institution time warner. shouldn't it be the other way around? >> well, it's sort of startling that a company that couldn't even buy beer is now buying one of the oldest media companies in the country that took a century to get this big. >> we're just scratching the surface in terms of how great these products can become. whether it's the internet, the way you communicate with people. software is in its early stage. there are some real advances that are going to make a big difference. >> microsoft in the beginning of the decade with their operating system and their productivity software was still very, very strong. >> microsoft ch

the top democrat on the senate intelligence committee mark warner is here live. >> hello, i'm jake tapper in washington where the white house is full of drama, while trump hunts down that roeg white house dpish official. and drama on the campaign trail with president obama's high octane, unprecedented 2018 debut. fewer than 60 days out for the

warner completes his opening remarks. to roger's point about targeting capabilities, that's what gdpr in europe takes aim at it'll be interesting to see if the legislators sort of table ideas that are similar to that in today's hearing >>well, i think that radiolooges point -- i love him. i was surprised these companies didn't get independent investigators or law firms to come in. wells fargo had a problem, they bring in a company fox has a problem, they bring in a company. these guys have a problem, they bring in nobody. i think they would be in that much better if they had ken fineberg and said he's come in and disrupted everything but that's okay we needed disrupting the fact they never brought in an outsider, the fact that the board is finally speaking today. i mean, without an outside investigation, they are at the mercy of congress. they could say here is the 200-page report written by someone we could not buy they were too good to buy. that's killing them. they never wanted that that's why, i think, roger has a goo

mark warner is here live. >>> hello. i'm jake tapper in washington where the state of our union is full of drama. drama in the white house. the president raging over that rogue anonymous senior administration official and drama on capitol hill and democrats swinging at the fences in a desperate bid to knock off trump's second supreme court nominee and drama on the campaign trail with obama's 2018 debut.

comments,r warner's we could label that with context. we are not necessarily as easily able to identify people who may be scripting our website. making it look like it is an actual human or even the app. making it look like a human performing these actions. that becomes much more challenging and not clear. in consideration of labeling and context, we need to make sure when people see the bot label, they are assuming everything is not on a human. we need to make sure there is an accuracy as we label them. sen. reed: wouldn't there be a value and beginning the labeling process, even with a disclaimer this identifies only a fraction of potential fictitious actors? jack: it is an idea we have been considering. especially this past year. it is up to the implementation. anryl: this is an idea i had opportunity to discuss with vice chairman warner yesterday in his office. we are committed to working with you on it. sen. reed: going forward, i think we will come to a major debate within this country and the whole world. data?o owns my which is r

warner: hardly. all i know is the same thing we find, every route we go down, there be more questions to ask and more questions -- connections, and that is all we know. mueller has talked to a number of people that we have not had the opportunity to talk to. i want it to be done as soon as possible. i do not like this cloud hanging over the whole administration. at the end of the day, the most important thing is for us to get the truth out and make sure we have protections for it to never happen again. mark warner, thank you. back to you in new york. at the whitee house, the president is currently speaking. let's listen in. president trump: we love canada. they are our next-door neighbor. we have had a great relationship with them for many years, but canada has done very well with this relationship and the united states from an economic standpoint, you look at the terrace that were put on our -- ariffs put on our dairy products, the tremendous trade barriers and we have not been treated fairly. we ha

>> mark warner has brought up many different policy ideas. you're right in that it will probably take several years before they come to fruition. some of the most pertinent ones i think that could be implemented are a bot labeling tool and i have heard twitter has been toying around with that. that is an immediate possibility. when it comes to the e.u., they have been much more forthcoming and have been at the forefront of regulating these tech giants. the newest vote is pretty momentum. it would be holding these tech platforms responsible for copyright infringement and the e.u. lawmakers argue that's a way to help these music, artist, creators who have been slammed by the rise of the platforms. that could be free. on the other hand, if this goes into effect, it would be a huge burden on the tech companies to come up with algorithms to figure out what kind of content has the correct licenses. some critics argue it could hurt small tech companies more because they might not have the ability to properly filter content. emily: selina, austin, th

anna warner has the story. >> reporter: it was nearly a year ago when the feel-good story of the homeless man johnny bobbitt giving his last $20 to help out a young woman who had run out of gas on the highway went viral. she and her husband collected $400,000 on gofundme to pay bobbitt's kindness back. but now a lawyer who is representing the couple in civil court has told the judge in a letter, one or both of them will likely be indicted. last week authorities could be seen towing away a bmw from the couple's home. their lawyer said the home was raided by the local prosecutor's office and records were seized as well as their personal property. bobbitt had filed suit, claiming the couple spent more than half the money. last month on nbc, mark d'amico and kate mcclure denied it. >> have you spent $1 of that on yourselves? >> no. >> reporter: they said they spent some of the money on drugs and now they are getting death threats. >> i think we did the right thing. >> reporter: adrian gonzalez runs a website called go fraud me. everything from faking cancer to lying about funeral expenses. >>

mark warner was up there criticizing google. larry page is being called unpatriotic. there criticizing themselves -- criticizing them for what they are tried to accomplish in china. they did not have a chance to go up there and talk about what they are doing to combat russian interference. facebook and twitter one a lot of good will -- goodwill with lawmakers by repeating the same thing over and over again. google did not have anything to lose by attending. they lost a lot by not being there. emily: a lot of investigation has gone into this story. what has larry page been up to? he recently became ceo of alphabet. in the meantime, where is he? >> fantastic question. that is the subject of the article. my colleague and the truth is, internally at alphabet and google, people say he is more withdrawn than ever. he is not the ceo of google, sony does not have to deal with the aid today issues but he is drawn to the more technical, sci-fi focus. research labs under alphabet. the larger question is if this technical focus should take priority when there is a lot la. more so

what we should have, as senator warner proposed, a dialogue, a discussion.ould talk about the big, important issues of privacy, foreign government interference, things we should do. liz: hold on. i know trade is also important to every sector here in america. we just want to let people know chrystia freeland, the foreign minister of canada, has just walked before the cameras on her way into the trade representative's office. important to mention that this is a return after a break in negotiations for a new nafta. prime minister justin trudeau said earlier it doesn't look like he needs to go to washington, d.c. for nafta talks at least at this time. let's listen in for a moment. >> as i said earlier today, the atmosphere continues to be constructive and cordial. [ inaudible ] >> chrystia freeland of course saying the tone remains the same, we are optimistic, we will be looking forward to at least perhaps striking some type of deal and there is a deadline ticking. back to you, gary, looking at everything from trade to regulation here, you want to slow somethin

warner brothers are producing a original series for this the first of which is called "titans. more for super hero fans entering the crowded market of all the streaming options. plus, netflix's hulu and amazon and among others next year disney is streaming its own stream service that'll feature its own, marvel content. now bob iger says it will cost less than netflix and less than dc universe. >> how well at&t can market the offspring from its new opposition the warner brothers catalog is not being put to word and john stanki is working on a new model to be announced this year. when it comes to competition of n netflix, stevenson says his videos are like tiffany to walmart. mike is at the plasma with a call to action >> we are talking about netflix here this is the 800 pounds or 400 pounds we are looking at a bull issue trend. first of all the stock is at a bull issue trend we have something that can make the stock move fairly sharply. taking a look at those moves and what we have noticed is the current price of option is implying a move that's lower than that. it is implying a

mark warner is here live. >>> hello. i'm jake tapper in washington where the state of our union is full of drama. drama in the white house. the president raging over that rogue anonymous senior administration official and drama on capitol hill and democrats swinging at the fences in a desperate bid to knock off trump's second supreme court nominee and drama on the campaign trail with obama's 2018 debut. fewer than 60 days out. the evidence of dysfunction and chaos inside the white house has never been more convincing. laid out in exhaustive detail in a new book by bob woodward and meticulous and highly respected reporter and in that anonymous op-ed describing the president as ignorant and unhinged. the evidence that president trump and his party are delivering on some of their promises is just as clear. we saw that friday in yet another strong jobs report with rising wages and low employment as the president's second nominee for supreme court, despite the democrats best efforts, appears headed for confirmation. joining u

emily: that was senator mark warner with bloomberg's kevin cirilli right there. want to walk through the day's and bring in somebody who recently testified before the senate committee on foreign operations in social media, laura rosenberger, codirector of the alliancesenate for a secure democracy. walk us through the highlights today. the room was packed. conspiracy theorist alex jones was there, interestingly, probably one of the many people interested in these discussions around shadow banning. were there any surprises? >> it certainly has been a marathon of hearings and one of them is still ongoing. the senate hearing, you certainly saw that the lawmakers were more prepared and quite a light the issues they wanted to hit the tech companies on. we also saw facebook and twitter really a vote their statements to say that this is their number one priority him at to stop abuse, stop for election meddling. there are also a lot of questions about, are they adequately equipped to deal with the evolving threat? many lawmakers brought up the new, coordinated miss inform

yesterday's senate hearing, mark warner, intelligence committee top democrat said i'm skeptical thate able to truly address this challenge on your own. congress is going to have to take action here can regulation transform these powerful tech companies? joining us, scott gallaway, thanks for joining us. scott, i want to start with you. you were on "power lunch" yesterday, talked about potential of no regulation of companies from lawmakers one of the things you mentioned, maybe it takes the doj to step in here. given news we have that the doj is looking to convene a meeting, what do you think? >> well, i am sort of never shocked at d.c. snatching from the jaws of victory. the most elegant way to do this, be pro-competition, not pro-government with regulation antitrust in my view has never not worked it would be great for the economy. and then they say but we also need to look at how they are stifling free speech that's wrong that's a plain dumb argument the focus will be there. and it will mess up the whole thing. if they were going right after anti-competitive monopolistic behavior,

occurred warner and jerry rice are responding to the bombshell ultimatum. former colts running back eric dickerson speaking on behalf of the group says if their needs aren't met they will boycott future induction ceremonies. until hall of famers receive health insurance and an annual salary including a share of league revenue. rice and warner's names were included in the letter making those demands. dickerson later clarified that he wrongly included rice and warner's names. they said they will not be boycotting the hall of fame ceremony. >>> south bay, health care workers held a vigil to keep a san jose hospital from closing. closing. they filed for bankruptcy last august. they are looking to sell, shut its doors and end contracts with current employees. it has an obligation to the community to keep the hospital open and maintain existing services. a former sesame street writer is saying that bert and ernie are a couple. >> there is some confusion. however, sesame street fired back, denying the claims. there is an lbgtq website and they enter the writer fro

warner: i worked with their company for a long time and i'm familiar with the senior management.ep i was disappointed they chose not to be part of the conversation about solutions. g this was notcha hearing. this was not internet 101. this was a group of individuals engaging meaningfully on an issue that is not going to go tuay. jane: dave, this not the first time these executives have been summoned. how much progress are they making? dave: that will make this the fourth hearing we haveadn this in less than a year. ma say that this is a chan for political theater, a for congressmen and women to have the soundbites be writing these tech companies. i think there has been some progress between the first hearing and where we are today. today's hearing was much more focused on where regulations come into it. regulationthat would perhaps force these companies to be slightly more transparent about their black boxes, particularly companies like google come wherh seesults appear towards knthe top and nobody realls why, apart frointhe people wihe company. regulations may force them to be i thi

warner wants him to say. it's sad, it's a pathetic situation.: it is sad, and burr has just thrown -- he's put his entire career in a ditch. it's amazing to me that he could just turn over the committee to the democrats and throw decency to the wind and go after a sitting president the way they have, and it just -- it's stunning to me how the people of north carolina could put up with such atrocious conduct. let's get to the fisa documents. >> sure. lou: the president apparently facing something of a contest within his own legal team, and emmet flood, who is in the white house counsel's office, apparently trying to stop the president from releasing those documents. at least those are the reports. your thoughts. >> look, the answer is extreme transparency, the president needs to get every single document he possibly can out. lawyers are built to minimize exposure, i get that, but in this case, the president is being harassed at a level no one has ever seen before in a presidency, and the more he gets out, the faster he gets it out, the more the a

bills pending to ensure it could be used instead people like mark warner are not talking about reforming. they haven't even bothered to cosponsor these bills. they are jumping to legislate the platforms clean up the problem. that's not a smart approach. the talk about what the platform should do, we should talk about not judicial as them, for understanding for us a lot, which is very different, who can and cannot speak on their platforms. we should speak about what obligation the house. if they've noticed before they've noticed before they've noticed a foreign doctrine they've noticed before and after infamous manipulator system, system, they should tell the government. i'm okay with that. what happens after that is to follow constitutional process in a lawful court order that satisfies the first amendment to take down anything. >> i agree with a lot of what berin has said. i would say it is not true that only broadcast has been subject to direct content regulation and whenever we have new communications media, they've enabled a lot of good things. it also enabled a lot of very bad thing

warner: thank you mr. chairman and let me first of all echo your comments about our friend and colleague john mccain. i hope we all take his advice to continue to put country first. welcome to the witnesses. today is an important public discussion. i am pleased that both facebook and twitter have sent their company's top leadership to address some of the critical public policy challenges. i look forward to a constructive engagement. i am deeply disappointed that google, one of the most influential digital platforms in the world, chose not to send its own top corporate leadership to engage this committee. i know our members have a series of difficult questions about structural vulnerabilities on a number of google's platforms that we need answers for. from google search, which continues to have problems surfacing absurd conspiracies. to youtube, where russian backed disinformation agents promoted hundreds of divisive videos. to gmail, where state sponsored operatives attempted countless hacking attempts. go

>> sadly, senator burr has become a sock pocket for senator warner.w zero times zero is still zero. so i can't imagine why they'd take an additional six months to write a report saying they found absolutely nothing. >> lou: because they can. >> i was heartened by mr. burr three weeks ago. when he did come to the president's assistance with one statement. but then in very short order now he has flipped again back to the same old line of repeating what mr. warner wants him to say. it's sad. it's a pathetic situation. >> lou: it is sad. and burr has just thrown his -- i mean he has put his entire career in the ditch. it's just, he is, it's just amazing to me that he could just turn over the committee to the democrats, throw reason and decency to the wind and go after a sitting president the way they have. it's stunning to me how the people of north carolina can put up with such atrocious conduct. let's get to the fisa documents. >> sure. >> lou: the president apparently facing something of a contest within his own legal team. emmet flood who is in the wh

>> sadly, senator burr has become a sock pocket for senator warner. know zero times zero is still zero. so i can't imagine why they'd take an additional six months to write a report saying they found absolutely nothing. >> lou: because they can. >> i was heartened by mr. burr three weeks ago. when he did come to the president's assistance with one statement. but then in very short order now he has flipped again back to the same old line of repeating what mr. warner wants him to say. it's sad. it's a pathetic situation. >> lou: it is sad. and burr has just thrown his -- i mean he has put his entire career in the ditch. it's just, he is, it's just amazing to me that he could just turn over the committee to the democrats, throw reason and decency to the wind and go after a sitting president the way they have. it's stunning to me how the people of north carolina can put up with such atrocious conduct. let's get to the fisa documents. >> sure. >> lou: the president apparently facing something of a contest within his own legal team. emmet flood who is in th

the top democrat on the senate intelligence committee mark warner is here live. >> hello, i'm jake tapper in washington where the white house is full of drama, while trump hunts down that roeg white house dpish official. and drama on the campaign trail with president obama's high octane, unprecedented 2018 debut. fewer than 60 days out for the most consequential midterm elections in recent memory. the dysfunction in the white house has been never been more convinceingly laid out in anonymous detail. and in that op-ed where the president is described as ignorant and unhinged. on friday, in yet another strong jobs report, with rising wages and low unemployment, as the president's second nominee for the supreme court, despite the president's best efforts is headed for confirmation. kellyanne, thank you for being here, the president has been talking a lot this week about the anonymous "new york times" op-ed and the president said he's narrowed the search down to just a few individuals? who's on the list. >> i have no idea who's on the list, what does concern me, jake, is that for a media that

and instead, people like mark warner are not talking about reforming that. to let us justg make the platforms clean up the problem. that is not a smart approach. nothould be talking about judicial lysing them -- not them, we should be talking about what obligation do they have? foreign actor a and they think someone is manipulating their system, they should tell the government. i am ok with that but what happens after that needs to follow constitution process. a lawful court order. mr. felp: i agree with a lot of what berin has said. i would say that it is not quite true that only broadcast has been subject to direct content regulation and i would say that whenever we have had new communications media, they have been able to do a lot of good things but also that thinks. we have struggled to find the right balance. for example, we have criminalized the use of telephones or wires in fraud or that criminalized the use of telephone to harass and abuse someone. we do not expect the telephone company to monitor everyone's telephone calls to prevent that harassment

dave warner. >> my name is dave warner. thank you for investing significant time on this topic and the engagement today and the last meeting. i would say it is great news that the state water board has reached out to explore more what is going on. that is a wonderful step in the right direction that leads me to how can we reach out to each other? the comment is maybe it is time to ask both sides what would it take for you to be more comfortable incorporating the other side's view. i can't spea speak speak for the environmentalists if it were accepted as equal or better than the state water bedder plan, that -- board plan that would go a long ways for us. technical comment. when we talk about 100 million gals a day, those are based on demand higher than what we have seen this decade. they are based on fairly high numbers. third comment, in 2014, los angeles mayor declared the los angeles would reduce water imports 50%. he was re-elected by a landslide. the point i like was there was a photo opfor him showing a groundbreaking

would amend forwarders to give it teeth to be sure it could be used and it's the people like mark warner are not talking about reforming it. they have bothered to cosponsor the bill. they are jumping to let's just make the platforms clean up the problem. that's not a smart approach and if we are going to talk about with the platform should do we should be talking not about judicial lysing them to make them responsible for deciding under force of law, which is different than what we've been discussing, who cannot speak on a platform. we should be talking with allocation to death. if you have no use for actor, if some is manipulate the system they should tell the government. i'm okay with that but what happens after that needs to follow constitutional process, we take a lawful court order. >> guest: so i agree with a lot of what berin has said. i would say that it's not quite true that only broadcast has been subject to direct content regulation and i would say that whenever we said new communications media, they been able -- enabled a lot of good things and a lot of bad things. you strugg

and instead people like mark warner, they haven't even bothered to cosponsor those bills. they're jumping to let's just make the platforms clean up the problem. that's not a smart approach. and if we are going to talk about what the platforms are going to do, we should be talking about making them responsible for deciding under force of law -- which is very different -- who and cannot speak on their platforms, we should be talking about what obligation do they have? if they notice a foreign actor, if they think someone's manipulating their system, yeah, sure, they should tell the government. what happens after that needs to follow constitutional process where they get a lawful court order that satisfies the first amendment to take down anything. >> guest: so i agree with a lot of what berin has said. i would say that it's not quite true that only broadcast has been subject to direct content regulation, and i would say that whenever we have had new communications media, they've enabled a lot of very good things. they've also enabled a lot of very bad things. and we have str