there's pushback initially to people like warren burger, seems like a new idea. >> it does seem to meoint is correct in one sense which is this is a very oddly phrased amendment. the first clause kind of makes no sense in the sense that what follows -- >> i hear you. >> doesn't follow logically. how does one think of it? what he seems to be saying is clearly the founders meant this was in the context of a militia otherwise why are those words there? >> he has a point about the founding, but in the same way the founder says -- said in the first amendment, congress shall make no law bridging freedom of speech and the press, but, of course, we say the president can't interfere with free speech and neither can federal courts and neither can states or localities. we have a broader view and rightly so, because after the civil war there was a new amendment passed, called the 14th amendment, and it actually says, here's its language, no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states. what are those? basic rights. fundament

there is pushback to people like warren burger.t seems like a new idea. >> it does seem to me that it is correct in one sense, which is -- this is a very oddly phrased amendment. the first clause kind of makes no sense in the sense that what follows -- it doesn't follow logically. how does one think of it? what he seems to be saying is founders meant is in the context otherwise why are those words there the. >> i think he has a fact about the founding but he says congress shall bridge no law. of course they si -- by the way, neither can states or localities. we have a broader view and because after the civil war a new amendment passed and it actually says no state shall make or enforce any which will abridge the privileges. what are they? basic rights, fundamental rights. we have a different understanding of the bill of rights than the founders did. >> and we also find them, one final thing. if you look at state institutions almost all of them today and in the 1860s, almost all of them have today strong after firm ma affirmatio aff

>> it's very hard for you to find republican members of congress, if any who share warren burger's viewthis. >> i tell you this. like i said, i challenge each and every one of them to come to my hometown where tomorrow i'm going to meet the parents who are burying their 20 and 21-year-old children, lives cut off needlessly. and we need to honor those memories. and we need to do that, carry those forward and come to the table and have reasonable conversations. i want to tell you that i can't imagine that the majority of americans don't believe we should honor the dead and the victims' families whose lives are irreparably changed by at least coming to the table, having a conversation, acting like they care. this is too important. the time is now. we must come and have these discussions. i can't think of any better time than the present. >> and david, from the polling shows most americans agree with the congresswoman on this. >> well, i wish that were true. but i think when you face the reality of this problem, it just isn't. that one of the things we have seen over the past decade is a ri

warren burger, the chief justice to the united states supreme court, made the point that it was so expensive and so time-consuming for individual citizens to resolve their disputes in courts of law that we needed what he called, what we all call an alternative dispute resolution system that was able to resolve these disputes in a for timely, more cost-effective sort of way, recognizing that very few people could afford to pay a lawyer an hourly fee or even a contingent fee for protracted civil litigation. and so that basically ordinary consumers were frozen out of the dispute resolution process and denied their day in court. well, that system actually worked pretty well, including arbitration which according to a federal statute, federal arbitration act is an impartial tribunal that basically decides these disputes in an efficient, cost-effective sort of way. and in fact, we know from the studies that have been done that consumers actually benefit more from arbitration than they do as a member of a class and a class action lawsuit where consumers typically get pennies on the dollar and the c

and, warren burger.re all the chief justice's we have, where we have more than one decade between their passing. so we'll see how chief justice fares in history, but it is interesting to watch these legacies unfurl. that trendson box and that is the great chief. and it is amazing to me. from the 1840's up to today, he is excited about the same number of times. about 40-50 cases a decade. most always, they want. had a big spike in the 1880's cited todayt he is excited tod the same as he was in the 1920's, 19 40's, 1950's. the justices a classic and i think this is a nice illustration of proof that he remains our classic, more than any other chief justice, by far. chief justice's loom large when they are alive and taking but once they move on, we forget them. except for him. curious to compare him with other historical sources, that often get cited by justices. so, let's say the federalist papers. together an ungainly chart that shows marshall versus everybody else. it is hard to read but basically, marsha

mike, the friendly burger flipping owner of the purple cow is none other than michael warren whose wife4 years earlier by that killer dressed as a clown. as for debbie, she's actually sheila keen, the person police suspected of being that killer clown, who despite circumstantial evidence pointing her way was never charged with the crime. >> even some of the investigators in the case were surprised that there was no indictment, because everything sort of lined up, pointing to sheila keen being the clown, and michael warren somehow being involved, but it was all circumstantial. >> reporter: still, there's something astonishing authorities in florida may not have known. when mike warren gets out of prison after serving more than three years on that odometer fraud conviction, he and keen hook up in the marriage capital of the world. that's right -- vegas! in a tasteful and understated ceremony at the little white wedding chapel in 2002, michael marries sheila, his former alleged mistress, and the prime suspect in his wife's death. >> the weird things that they would hang together that long,

warren commission, that oswald alone murdered america's 35th president. >> when i got and saw the documents and started to go through them, it became increasingly clear it was a nothing burgeris was very, very disappointed. >> reporter: and yet some intriguing new details. among them a reporter for an obscure british newspaper claims to have received advance warning of the assassination in a phone call supposedly a half hour before the fatal shots were fired. new questions about the cia's role. new details about the possible motives of the cubans to kill jfk. the documents also reveal how eager fbi director j. edgar hoover was to convince the public that oswald is the real assassin. but the biggest hope for conspiracy theories and jfk obsessives may be president trump's 11th hour decision to delay the release of the most-sensitive documents by a further six months. trump said he had no choice but to give the cia and the fbi more time to review them. >> if there's a smoking gun in these jfk files, and i don't think there is, they're in the documents that are still being held back. >> reporter: the jigsaw puzzle that has bedeviled this country for decades still has huge holes