this had been used to discredit the warren commission's work.llet, and the idea was attributed to arland specter, then a prosecutor, later a senator, that this bullet would do all of these things, and how crazy that is. this calls into question, the single bullet theory, and obviously, if that bullet was on president kennedy, that would not have been the same bullet that would have hit governor connally. it doesn't, necessarily, change the idea that there was one gunman, but, it does suggest if mr. landa's account is correct, and believed, does suggest some shoddy-ness by the warren commission which, for anybody who knows anything about the warren commission, will not come as much of a surprise. >> jake, thank you for joining us to talk about all of that. >> thank you so much, abby. >> thank you for watching cnn prime time. laura coates, starting right now. >> where the escape murder was captured just after atm. tonight he is back behind bars, for the first time i might at. since august 31st. in the pennsylvania state prison in a different count

the warren commission says the bullet was ultimately found on governor colonies stretcher.as a bullet. and that was the single bullet theory for the magic bullet theory that the warren commission said wind through president kennedy is back out his throat, then hit governor connally in front of him. this has been used to discredited the warren commission's work, the idea that this one bullet, the idea of -- attributed to a prosecutor later a senator. that this bullet would do all of these things, and how crazy is that. this calls into question that single bullet theory, because obviously if that bullet was behind president kennedy, it would not have been the same bullet that would have hit governor connally. it doesn't necessarily change the idea of whether or not there was one gunman, but it does suggest if mr. paul landis account is correct, and to be believed, it does suggest some shoddy nest by the warren commission. and for anybody who knows anything abouthe

kennedy, according to the warren commission report.witness, a kennedy secret service agent breaks his silence after 60 years." it's by one-time secret service agent paul landis, who was then in his late 20s and provided security for the first lady. now his book is adding to the controversy over the magic bullet theory, a reference to the warren commission's conclusion that before the fatal shot hit kennedy in the head, a single bullet, recovered almost in tact, passed through kennedy's throat and continued on to seriously wound texas governor john connelly in the seat in front of kennedy. landis was in the car behind president kennedy's limousine on november 22, 1963. he heard the shots and saw with his own eyes much of what happened. he continued working in the security detail but left the secret service less than a year after the assassination and never mentioned then his own moment with that single in tact bullet until he says he found out the warren commission report did not match his memory, writing, the super bullet hadn't been o

this has been used to discredited the warren commission's work, the idea that this one bullet, the idea of -- attributed to a prosecutor later a senator. that this bullet would do all of these things, and how crazy is that. this calls into question that single bullet theory, because obviously if that bullet was behind president kennedy, it would not have been the same bullet that would have hit governor connally. it doesn't necessarily change the idea of whether or not there was one gunman, but it does suggest if mr. paul landis account is correct, and to be believed, it does suggest some shoddy nest by the warren commission. and for anybody who knows anything about the warren commission, this will not come as a surprise. >> jake, thank you so much for joining us to talk about all of that. >> thanks. >> and thank you for watching cnn prime time. laura coates starts right now. >> good evening everyone. i'm so glad you're here with us tonight. i'm laura coates. welcome to cnn tonight. manhunt, capturing a killer. i have been fascinated by the story, so our, you we will go in depth of the

three members of the warren commission did not believe it. three presidents did not believe it. did not believe the lone gunman theory, president nixon questioned the cia about the who shot john angle, and president johnson the man who appointed the warren commission did not believe it's conclusions and had believed that kennedy was killed by his enemies. paul antis's account at a lot to that weight of evidence and it shows that president biden made a terrible mistake when he actually asked the cia pressure for continuing secrecy around thousands of jfk records. landis shows that this is an open question and we really need a much better explanation of what happened on november 22nd 1960. >> when you talk about the magic bullet theory, it is the idea that this same bullet struck both kennedy and connolly, basically in one foul swoop. fares, can you just weigh in here? what is your view on why, perhaps, this is wrong? >> well, it is wrong on a number of things. first of land is did not avail himself to facts or to actual documentation in records. i find it highly suspicious that s

>> remarkably enough, the warren commission did not interview him. and the fbi did not interview him. there were several agents in that follow car who were never interviewed. they were the closest witnesses to what happened. paul was on the side of the follow-up car. he was a direct witness. he discovers a bullet and bullet fragments that are critical to what happened here and nobody questioned him. by the time he left jackie kennedy's service, the warren commission wasn't out yet. nobody heard. he went on his way. thinking he left the bullet with the president. >> i read your piece in "vanity fair." you believe what he has to say. you think he's credible in what he is describing and what he has relayed as the facts. i want to take a step back. ing there magic bullet, that a xas.le bullet struck the esiden and the idea it waable to cause injuries i way, has a head scratcher fole who have been following all of this. what would it mean to that theory? is it gone? >> i'm like you. i started my relationship after his book was done. i had no stake in the

i had not read any -- i did not read the warren commission until four years ago.that whatever they were talking about, a magic bullet, i figured they had to have it right. nobody ever questioned me. nobody ever called me over 60 years. >> jesse: do you believe there was another shooter besides oswald that day? >> not yet, no, nothing changed my mind to think that there's another shooter. i heard the first shot. turned and looked over my right shoulder where the sound came from. turned back, i looked to president kennedy. he was leaning slightly to his left and he had his arms raised up towards his throat. but i just thought -- i thought the first shot had hit him. but i'm quickly scanning around and then a few seconds later this very short period of time i heard a second shot. i still, looking at the limo, i saw no reaction. everybody seemed to be the same. was jumping ahead to jump on the president's limo, just as he got there, there was a third shot and the president's head exploded and just blood and flesh and brain matter. i ducked as we drove through it. at t

three members of the warren commission did not believe it. three presidents did not believe it.t harry truman did not believe the lone gunman theory, president nixon questioned the cia about the who shot john angle, and president johnson the man who appointed the warren commission did not believe it's conclusions and had believed that kennedy was killed by his enemies. paul antis's account at a lot to that weight of evidence and it shows that president biden made a terrible mistake when he actually asked the cia pressure for continuing secrecy around thousands of jfk records. landis shows that this is an open question and we really need a much better explanation of what happened on november 22nd 1960. >> when you talk about the magic bullet theory, it is the idea that this same bullet struck both kennedy and connolly, basically in one foul swoop. fares, can you just weigh in here? what is your view on why, perhaps, this is wrong? >> well, it is wrong on a number of things. first of land is did not avail himself to facts or to actual documentation in records. i find it highly sus

the warren commission did not interview him and the fbi did not interview him.are several agents in that follow up car who were never interviewed even though they were the closest eyewitnesses to what happened. paul was on the running vote on the right side of the follow-up car which was code named -- and he was a direct witness and then of course once he gets to parkland hospital he discovers the bullet and bullet fragments that are critical to what happened here and nobody talked to him. nobody questioned him. by the time he left jackie kennedy's service, the warren commission was not even out yet. nobody even heard of the single bullet theory and he just went on his way thinking he had left the bullet with the president and it was used in the autopsy. >> i read your piece in vanity fair and you clearly believe he what he has to say. if you think he is credible and what he is describing and is relaying as the facts. i want to take a step back in the significance of this because there is this magic bullet theory that has been talked about. a single bullet not o

i had not read any of the i did not read the warren commission until four years ago.year s i, i justccepted the fact that whatever they talkingllet, about a magic bullet, i figuredd they had to have it right.oned nobody ever questioned me. nobody me. recall it over 60 ye. >> do you believe now that there was another shooter besides oswald that day? >> not yet. no, nothing. nothing. to my mind to think that there another shooter. i heard the first shot turned over my right shoulder where the sound came from. turn back. i looked at president kennedy. he was leaningident to his lef. and as arms raised up towards his throat. but i. i justthroat. thought i. i thought the first first shot h hit him. but i was quickly scanning around and. then a few seconds later, that's a very short period of time. shori heard a second shot. ng a i still looking at the limo. i saw anth overreaction.erybod everybody seemed to be the same. clint hill was raciny to beg ad to jump on the president's limo just as he got there. there waere was a third shot, and that has the president's heads exploded in just the

hearings and investigation of what happened, of my uncle's death, in 1979. 15 years after the warren commissionsassination committee concluded my uncle was killed by a conspiracy. multiple people involved. half the people on the committee think the cia, more than half, believe the cia was involved in the assassination and the cover-up. there are reams and reams of evidence since then, since 1979, that have supported that view. the interesting thing about officer landis' reason, revelation, is that for the first time the mainstream media, like "the new york times," that have been absolutely adamant about protecting the warren commission orthodoxy. for the first time they are saying maybe we were wrong about that. maybe it it isn't a conspiracy theory there may maybe actually the evidence supports that there were multiple people involved in that assassination. that it was not a lone gunman. >> neil: do you think the same applies to your father? 200b sirhan -- sirhan theron, supposedly just sirhan theron? >> i've been clear about this. people should make up their own minds. they need to look at th

hit kennedy and he does not believe that same bullet hit texas governor john connally as the warren commission kennedy's stretcher and it may have later rolled onto connally's. stretcher sajeed resting. there may have been another gunman who hit connally, but another agent in dallas that day is dismissed. >> landis claim saying the evidence and the statements just don't line up. next, let's check out the big moments from week one of the nfl. >> yeah, first, a giant loss for new york. the dallas cowboys pummeled the giants last night, 42. nothing the giants had not lost by that many points since 1973. >> another sunday shocker involves joe burrow one day after signing his record breaking contract extension, the bengals quarterback threw for a career low 82 yards in a blowout loss to the browns. >> the good news here in new england, tom brady returned to foxboro. the patriots retired his number 12. brady says he knows why his team won six super bowls. >> it's one of my core beliefs. there's nothing significant in life that can be accomplished as an individual. it's always about the team. one thi

we need equivalent of a warren commission. essentially the notion that supreme court justice has been snuffed out with a pillow over face. none of that would happen if. we had a standardized system of death investigation. these are just the high profile disasters, quite frankly. we don't have a system that's part of the problem. as late as 2009 and its report, strengthening forensic science in the united states, a path forward, the national academy of science sciences lamented death investigation in the united states is, fragmented, deficient hodgepodge and disjointed. and the reason, as i say, is we don't have a system. what we essentially have is the medical who's goals should be aren't always justice and science overly on top of a much, much older system. the system of the coroner and it's the system of the coroner they want to talk for the rest of our lecture today. now i don't want to turn coroners into the villains of this story that's not my point many of the advancements that i laid out at beginning at the triangle shi

had not revealed to chief justice earl warren and the members of the warren commission.those plots and use of mafia figures. well, you don't have to be genius to understand the implications of that. so we set out, with the help, some people at this table to try to bring these three mafia figures in. we. one in johnny roselli and ended up bringing him in twice we had subpoenaed or prepared to subpoena. sam g and collins. and here's what happened. before we. could subpoena john carter. he was killed in his basement with six bullet holes in the throat or thereabouts and murder never solved. after the second appearance of johnny roselli. he disappeared and, was found two or three months later. it's in the book, floating in. a 50 island drum or some such thing in dumbfounded bay. and off the miami coast, he had been killed. rick. rick came me and two other staff members from the republican side. we down with the approval of frank church to interview the dade county sheriff and the. miami police department. they showed the first thing they did was show us pictures of roselli i

kept asking about the warren commission, and other conspiracies. the pardon question is as if the kennedy had laid it to rest. susan: you begin and end the book about two stories of people he invited to the white house. george mcgovern and jesse. richard: two improbable stories. in 1975, george mcgovern was invited to a stag dinner. he is frankly, amazed. he says to president ford, lyndon johnson never invited me to the white house. he said, richard nixon never invited me to the white house and ford said, i know, that is why i asked you to the house belongs to everyone you and in 1972, george mcgovern voted for gerald ford against his own party's nominee. the book ends, it is bracketed with two acts of hospitality that are meant to be compensatory.. jesse owens, ford knew him. ohio, michigan, he was at the track meet as a young man where jesse owens set three world records in one day. he had this real connection of sorts. the 1976 olympic games just ended and he was walking the american team back. he thought it would be really special if heed jesse

but more importantly when congress reinvestigated the warren commission evidence and was looking at muchence than 1979 the house elect assassinations committee, they came to the conclusion and this was the conclusion, official conclusion of the report, that john kennedy was killed by a conspiracy. majority of that house staff believed that it was the cia behind that conspiracy. the important thing that's happened now is finally, the new york times, the orthodoxy is starting to crumble. the new york times, which has been the major bastian, the champion of the warren committee report long after it was discredited by a million different sources. the other thing that's important now, sean, is, yeah, i think they ought to have a real investigation of what happened, a genuine investigation that looks at all the evidence, millions of pages of documents that are now available. but, more importantly, the last 5,000 pages of documents that the cia will not release, it's breaking the law now they're supposed to release those documents by 2017. president trump promised to release them which was his

his book casts new doubts on the conclusions of the warren commission's single bullet theory that a singleedy and texas governor john connelly. we'll ask him about that, why he kept silent all these years. we have other questions for him too. >>> five memphis police officers were indicted on federal charges for the beating death of tyre nichols. what that might mean for the state charges they're already situationing. that's next in "the situation room" with wolf blitzer. ♪ please don't go ♪ ♪ please don't go.. ♪ ♪ p please don't go ♪ ♪ please don't go ♪ ♪ don't goooooo! ♪ (♪) ♪ don't go away ♪ (♪) ♪ please don't go ♪ ♪i'm hearing different ways for me to screen for colon cancer.♪ ♪it's time to use my voice,♪ ♪i've got a choice, more tn one answer.♪ ♪i sat downith my doc.♪ we had a talk. ♪knew just what to say.♪ ♪i asked for cologuard and did it my way.♪ cologuard is a one-of-a kind way to screen for colon cancer that's effective and non-invasive. it's for people 45 plus at average risk, not high risk. false positive and negative results may occur. ask your provider for cologuard. ♪i did it

the warren commission for the reason that i said.you know, breaks bones. so know, breaks bones. and so forth. history needs to be forth. this history needs to be right and it needs to be it needs to be something that, as we go forward, that we further analyse . in what paul analyse. in light of what paul has said . has said. >> james and i so powerfully remember that day. i was ten years old at the time. thank you for talking to us about the kennedy assassination. in a few minutes, i'll be joined by sean stephens from the foundation for individual rights and expression to why the united to tell me why the united states's prestigious states's most prestigious universities most universities are also the most intolerant free speech. a intolerant of free speech. a brighter outlook with boxt solar proud sponsors of weather on . gb news. >> hello there. >> hello there. >> i'm jonathan vautrey here with your latest gb news weather forecast provided by the met office. it is going to be an unsettled second half of the weekend for many of us,

and at this time i will take roll commission president matsuda here, commission vice president warren here. commissioner foley, present. commissioner vergara here and commissioner right here. thank you, commissioners. first on our agenda is general public comment at this time, members of the public may address the commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission except agenda items with respect to agenda items. your opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when the item is reached. in the meeting. each member of the public may address the commission for up to three minutes. again if you're in the chambers, please come forward. if you're calling in remotely, you need to press star three. seeing no one in the chambers coming forward, let's go to our remote caller. hello. good afternoon. this is michael petrelis calling in. i'm represent fat friends, friends and allies of the castro theater . i'm calling in because the mismanagement of the castro theater by another planet entertainment has basically killed the c

commission. i look forward to answering your questions. mr. nehls: thank you, mr. warren. i ask unanimous consent to into intr into the record the following letters from the association of american railroads and coalition for the northeast corridor as well as the letter from the rail passengers association c.e.o. without objection, so ordered. i'd like to thank you all, thank you both for your testimony. we'll now turn to questions from the panel. i will recognize myself for five minutes. i appreciate you, mr. garner, good to see you. i see you've got the chief behind you there. thank you for coming. i want to bring to your attention, i'm sure you're familiar with the office of the inspector general, this report that talks a little bit about safety and security. amtrak has opportunities to strengthen controls over high security keys are. you gentlemen familiar with this report? >> yes. mr. nehls: mr. warren, familiar with the report? >> i have not had a chance to read it. mr. nehls: mr. gardner is familiar. i'm trying to read this, there's so many redak, i'm trying to put

and at this time i will take roll commission president matsuda here, commission vice president warren here. commissioner foley, present. commissioner vergara here and commissioner right here. thank you, commissioners. first on our agenda is general public comment at this time, members of the public may address the commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission except agenda items with respect to agenda items. your opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when the item is reached. in the meeting. each member of the public may address the commission for up to three minutes. again if you're in the chambers, please come forward. if you're calling in remotely, you need to press star three. seeing no one in the chambers coming forward, let's go to our remote caller. hello. good afternoon. this is michael petrelis calling in. i'm represent fat friends, friends and allies of the castro theater . i'm calling in because the mismanagement of the castro theater by another planet entertainment has basically killed the c

commission's website. but mr. fuller, please call the next item. item five is the award of the pit stop workforce development agreement with mission hiring hall. warren hill, assistant manager of central operations, is here to present the grant agreement. and this is an action item. thank you, mr. hill. before you come to the podium, i have a few comments since the motion to approve this item and the other grant award on the agenda today did not pass at our last commission meeting. these items were continued to prepare for the reconsideration on the commission asked public works staff to provide answers to a number of questions. commissioner turner raised regarding department grant rfp and awards. i'd like to thank the department staff for answering commissioner turner's question and providing the additional information he requested. those answers and information will be posted to the public works commission's correspondence log. also, between our last meeting and today, commissioner turner and i had a lengthy discussion with public works manager of contract administration alex burns and deputy city attorney yadira taylor to discuss public works cont

warren post. >> here. >> chair post is present. >> turner is absent. paul woolford. >> present. >> zoubi. >> present. >> vice chair zoubi is present. with 3 present we have quorum for the public works commission for members ever public wish to comment on an item from outside the hearing room today you will dial 415-655-0001 >> use the id of access code: 2663 971 7202 ## and then to raise your hand to be recognized press star 3. unless you are speak under general public comment, note that you must limit comments to the topic of the item discussed if commenters don't stay on topic the chair may ask you to limit your comment to the agenda item at hand. why we ask public comment med in a civil and respectful sxhern refingerprint from profanity. address your remarks to the commission not to individuals or staff. public is welcome to submit comment in writing via e mail of publicworks. commission @sfdww. org we thank sfgovtv media service staff for making this meeting public. well is construction work going on just above our heads this relates to the heating and air congress for the building. it may be a bit stuffy but we have windows open and may have extra noise. chair post. >> thank you. >> befo

warren post. >> here. >> chair post is present. >> turner is absent. paul woolford. >> present. >> zoubi. >> present. >> vice chair zoubi is present. with 3 present we have quorum for the public works commissionpublic wish to comment on an item from outside the hearing room today you will dial 415-655-0001 >> use the id of access code: 2663 971 7202 ##