what you're many stories at bloomberg.com on this >> "democrats refine contempt charge against warren mcgann ahead of the house vote in the coming weeks." what are they and what will we see on the house floor? all: the audi launched criminal contempt resolution, which could have led to criminal charges to william barr for not producing documents. instead, they are going to the floor on tuesday, a full house vote, on what is essentially a similar process, to allow the committee and other committees to launch legal proceedings in federal court to get the documents and testimony they are seeking. this is a change in part because they realize that the attorney general they would hold criminally would have to be prosecuted by the justice department. it is unlikely they would take any action against him. they also believe they created a new process in this resolution where the committee chairman would not even have to hold committee votes to try to go and get permission from a special committee called the bipartisan legal advisory committee, basically run by speaker pelosi to get permission just t

democrats were find contempt chance against warren mcgann ahead of the houseboat in the coming weeks. what are they refined and what will we see on the house floor? to launch legal proceedings and federal court to get the documents and testimony they are seeking. this is a change in part because they realize that the attorney general they would hold criminally would have to be prosecuted by the justice department. it is unlikely they would take any action against him. they also believe they created a new process in this resolution where the committee chairman would not even have to hold committee votes to try to go and get permission from a special the bipartisand legal advisory committee, basically run by speaker pelosi to get permission just to intervene or actually launch legal action without any other authority. >> so this bipartisan, legal advisory committee, this is an all new structure? since it's been around 1992 and has been used by speakers both republican and of shortcutget kind permission to intervene in lawsuits. what is new now is that this is going to allow not only jud

stories at bloomberg.com on this issue reads -- "democrats refine contempt charge against warren -- against barr and mcgannhead , of the house vote in the coming weeks." what are they and what will we see on the house floor? there been a couple of changes from what that house judiciary committee already past. billy: they launched a criminal contempt resolution, which could have led to criminal charges to william barr for not producing documents. the committee sought. instead, they are going to the floor on tuesday, a full house vote, on what is essentially a civil process, to allow the committee and other committees to launch legal proceedings in court, federal court to get the documents and testimony they are seeking. this is a change in part because they realize that the attorney general, if he were to be held criminally, would have to be prosecuted by the justice department, which he runs, and it is unlikely they would take any action against him. they also believe they created a new process in this resolution, where the committee chairman would not even have to hold committee votes, much less floor vot