so, the "washington post" on friday made the point that the a.p. had the story on may 7th and john brennan was talking about it on may 8th. it would appear they were investigating the a.p. for doing what they themselves was doing is leaking. they want to be exclusive to themselves and willing to violate the law or bend the rules. there is a process to questions. i have talked to multiple people at a.p.. they were not notified as the law required. they been and had the obama administration been deft at handling, this they violated the provision. >> it's clear cal, that the white house, a.p. was going to on blow the story on what the white house was going announce. that may be the source. >> that is exactly right. to follow up on with a jim was saying, there was an agreement to hold this story, the story the foiling of an al-qaeda plot for five days. they had a quick meeting on monday. the a.p. said it was going to publish anyway even though the administration was going to announce this the next day. administration goes ahead, c.i.a. goes ahead, they

so the "washington post" to the rescue.dnesday, also jay's birthday, this article appeared about carney's new tone about the press citing expects how he praised reporters for being smarted and, quote, there is legitimate concerns how the white house has handled the irs scandal. if that wasn't enough, there was a full page piece about jay and his favorite band. we'll keep an what they'll do next to put jay in a happy place. that is wrap for fox news. thags to our panel. i'm jon scott. we'll be back with another edition of news watch next week. >> gregg: fox news alert. new allegations in the irs abuse scandal. attorneys representing tea party groups now say they do have evidence linking a top agency official to targeting of conservative groups. the woman at the center of this controversy is lois lerner, she last refused to resign and now on administrative leave but, she is still taking a paycheck. hello, i'm gregg jarrett. welcome to a brand-new hour inside america's news headquarters. >> heather: i'm health health. new heat

why do you want to focus on real scandals when you can focus on shoes of the washington post? five days earlier they posted a story about how rumbler and the others decided not to talk about the scandal. >> they should not trivial lies. conquer? >> and just to back up that point none of us read the other story story. >> cody did. >> that's why he was screaming loudly. >> matt, you said this is what newspapers do in general butter up sources which i guess was fine. can we agree that the only people we think in washington is glamorous? >> we can't agree. there is an audience out there. there are people who wake up on sunday mornings and watch the sunday morning talk show. >> they don't think those people are glamorous. >> michelle obama is on the cover of a lot of magazines and barack obama. >> they are different because they are radiant. >> washington has some glamour. but there is a weird interest people have in looking at this as a glamour spectator sport. it is gross, but it happens. >> and men cannot be raid yept. radiant. >> can they? >> no because you have to be pregnant.

. >>> new this morning from "the washington post," a friend of boston suspect tamerlan tsarnaev who was killed during questioning was reportedly unarmed. law enforcement originally told reporters ibragim todashev went crazy and stabbed an fbi agent with a knife. >>> police are looking for a motive after arresting a disneyland worker who they say caused a small explosion at the california park. christian barnes is being held on $1 million bail after setting off a so-called dry ice bomb. >>> take a look at this video from russia. a driver's heading down the road when suddenly there's a black bear darting across the street. smack s right into the car. thankfully the bear gets up, scurries off. able to get up and scamper away. >> time for a look at today's business headlines. for that we turn to cnbc's bertha coombs. >> good morning. markets could see red arrows today after the dow suffered its worst day in about a month on worries about the global slowing. meantime, motorola is launching a high-end smart phone later this year called the moto-x what makes it special? it's going to be made a

however, you can always count on the "washington post" it say all these scandals are nothing. just move on. >> what about that? the fact that eric holder apparently was supposed to, you know, put all of this down in writing and doesn't do it? this is the nation's top law enforcement. >> this is typical of what you see as the informality of governance of the obama administration. they believe that word of mouth is sufficient when it shouldn't be. they believe that management is something left to underlings. they don't seem to take much of the acts of governance as seriously as we might ask them to do. >> big story of the week, though, chris matthews, the thrill up the leg is gone. >> next on news watch, more on the media and the scandals overshadowing the president. >> is there a siege mentality on the west wing right now? >> the white house press grilled obama's spinman. will the media dig deeper for the details or back off to protect their man? find out next on "newswatch" [ man ] on december 17, 1903, the wright brothers became the first in flight. [ goodall ] i think the mo

and i think we're seeing another case here where even the "washington post" which has not been a fan of the story puts the widow of one of the heroes of benghazi on the front page with gregory hicks in the foreground. a picture's worth a thousand word despite the media blackout. >> and the headline, facts on benghazi withheld, a day after the hearings. people are starting to stoffer the story. >> yes -- discover the story. >> yes, despite tremendous resistance on the part of the mainstream media. they had to go out of their way to make sure they couldn't find any news. even some still said they couldn't find any news in the hearing which is why i want to salute brian preston who found seven kind of astonishing new bits of information that really call into question the administration's credibility. now we have competing sets of allegations about not only what happened before benghazi but much more important in terms of a "cover-up." what may have happened afterwards. and that's now where the media should be focused. i don't know if they will be, but perhaps they've been shamed into co

here to discuss the numbers is financial reporter for "the washington post" ylan mui. ll me about the reaction we saw from wall street and washington. guest: they were significantly better than people were expecting. what we saw was that economic data over the past month has come in the a little weaker than people wanted to see. the march jobs number 88,000lly was set at jobs created in the month of march. that is nowhere near the level we need in order to see the recovery take off. host: that number cause a lot of concern. guest: exactly. the numbers we saw yesterday really were assigned that the thevery -- were a sign that recovery is chugging along. even though it is not at the level we would like to see it at yet. thousand jobs165 created in april, but the department also revised its figures for the previous two months. that was just as important. february jobs were now over 330,000 jobs created. in the month of march, the number that so may people were worried about is now looking at 130,000 jobs. significantly higher. host: i want to dig into these numbers, but al

"the washington post" dana mill banks said 100 days into his second term obama already lost control of the agenda. if he ever had control in the first place. he ricocheted through his news conference as he has through his presidency recently between issues and crises, not of his choice. cnn though had a very different take on it president barack obama confidently declared that his administration will get things done in washington. despite an atmosphere described as divided and politically dysfunctional. so which of those two descriptions do you agree with ellen? >> well, i was just about to go after the cnn one. i'm actually pretty critical of the media on this. and part of that is that it's always the networks that ask questions and a couple people did deal with that. there was some discussion about that. but nobody really focused on what kind of questions were asked and whether the president really has power or not power and how he is using it. and i mean, i'm pretty critical of that. but i think the media could have used it they all talked about his defensiveness or they gave him a

coveringle -- the week, doyle mcmanus of "the los angeles times," dan balz of "the washington post," fawn johnson of the "national journal," and charles babington of the ssociated press. >> award-winning reporting and analysis, covering history as it happens. live from our nation's capital, this is "washington week with gwen ifill". corporate funding for "washington week" is provided by -- >> we went out and asked people a simple question. how old is the oldest person you've known? we gave people a sticker and had them show us. we learned a lot of us have known someone who's lived well into their 09's, and that's a great thing. but even though we're living longer, one thing that hasn't changed, the official retirement age. the question is, how do you make sure you have the money you need to enjoy all of these years? >> additional corporate funding for "washington week" is rovided by boeing. additional funding is also provided by the annenberg foundation, the corporation for public broadcasting, and by contributions to your pbs stations from viewers like you. thank you. once again, liv

"washington post" reports a top white house health care adviser met with hundreds of people, includingsion funds, hedge funds, mutual funds, managers, all the talk about something called about something called public information, quote, unquote. do you really believe that? just public information? does anybody believe that? here now is former federal prosecutor, mitch enner, counsel at will being as lander. welcome back. let's get this right. elizabeth fowler, i'm not casting aspersions, this is from the "washington post" story, elizabeth fowler was a top white house health care aide. she met with hundreds of people. sometimes in small groups like one or two. now, the bush crowd, richard painter, who was in charge of ethics in the bush crowd, said no. that you should not meet with outside groups, because nonpublic information will come of it. who has got this story right? >> larry, i would think that you as a free market guy, you've mentioned that free market capitalism is the best path to prosperity, would want the people who have the biggest stake in this game to be part of the proce

items but there was this interesting item in "the washington post".com. the headline is, four pinnochios, i'm sorry, a bushel of pinnochios for the irs's lois lerner. she was the woman who was running all of this tea party check thing. and "the washington post" says that between 2010 and 2012, this is a quote from lois lerner, we started seeing a very big up tick in the number of 501(c)(4) applications we were receiving and many of these organizations applied, more than double in 1500 in 2010 and over 3400 in 2012. that was, she said to the american bar association in this, in this statement that kicked off this whole investigation. the post did a little checking. found out in fact in 2009 there were 1745 investigations. so she undersold the 2009 numbers. in 2010, it only jumped to 1865. and then by 20 very much len it was 2540. as the post points out the investigation of conservative groups were underway. i'm throwing a lot at you there but what do you make of all that? >> that was supposedly the reason all this occurred this was merely an innocent way f

that is the way things work. >> what was your beat the "washington post"? >> i had a variety of beats at the post. i covered a city of alexandria. but i also later covered the corps general sessions, which is now the superior court. and i covered welfare and i covered education in the d.c. public schools. i was on the metro staff. >> not only were you a reporter of the post but a journalism professor at the university of maryland following the field for a long time. do you see -- what is the difference now for the female reporters in the 1960's and 70's? >> well, there's a lot of differences. actually, i am still at the university of maryland. i'm a graduate director of the college of journalism. we men have many more opportunities now than men do, but i still think it's harder for the women to practice the glass ceiling. one of the things about this book so that i ended with is how i ron that is that now women have the chance to be the leading figures in journalism. and they have a chance to be editors of the major newspapers. they have much more of a chanc

host: including the "washington post" style section article. his musical path and -- passion. host: good morning, brad. caller: there is so much to say. the last caller rallied about the republicans copping no bridges to be built, when the democrats held the house and senate during obama's first term and they got the stimulus passed, and most of that money went to the teachers unions and other union causes. they were the ones steering this. your guests constantly keeps forgetting that and act like it is the republicans' fault for keeping the people's business that day. but obama ran for for the first time on closing gitmo. he ran on making jobs. neither of which have happened. he could have closed guantanamo during the first two years if he felt so abhorrent about the process, as he said so when he was running. journalism here is selective. you are so partisan. the excuses are really why term "drive-by media" is there. guest: first of all, i am delighted that he watches c-span if he is hostile to the media because it is that he is giving c-span

that was in the basis for the washington post article.t they were saying is that the chinese have had spectacular successes which may diminish u.s. security that was the key point. host: how did "the washington post" get this report? guest: the science board under dr. paul kaminski, former undersecretary of defense for acquisition, has been focused on cyber and network security since he took over. apparently the reporter got a hold of the confidential edition and i suspect there is a highly classified version, and that version, unlike the unclassified version, names names and identifies systems. host: names systems leaked by the administration? guest: i'm hearing stories that this was leaked by the administration. in ministration might have some basis for saying, look, i'm getting public pressure here, and we have got to have some arrangement about your espionage. it is out of control. ist: the meeting dan goure referring to is the president, president obama meeting with his counterpart from china for a two-day summit in california. headl

as far as we can see no apology from "the washington post.t to take that --k franklin county from katelyn. there is obviously an i understand endoin there which is not complimentary in her view. >> well, you look -- it's almost like the code words for ways that they hate the right racial code word. you like chick-fil-a that must make you a bigot it is so dismissive in 140 characters of, you know, raising questions, situation where the first time we lost an ambassador, had an ambassador killed since 1979 ordinarily journalists would actually care about such thing "the washington post" tweeting out information to her little surprise at the end. chick-fil-a and stance on gay marriage. it's clear she thought the benghazi thing was a big nothing burger. queer -- query about whether that was appropriate. does any of this matter? if the "the washington post," if the "new york times," if the "l.a. times," if the san francisco chronicle were reporting this in a way that didn't dismiss these whistle blowers'' sworn testimony as a yarn, and nothing to s

the "washington post" -- just a minute, "washington post" reports today senior white house aides including the president's chief counsel were focused on shielding obama from the issue despite the flammable politics of the story. here's what she said. somebody said in the paper today "ruemmler's lawyerly focus sometimes conflicts with political imperatives. the absence of such dominant first-term personalities, david axelrod and rahm emanuel, left the white house scrambling to contain its public image. unlike most senior white house aides, ruemmler has no campaign experience. a former colleague said she wasn't really interested in politics." so here's my question. this is not critical to the president's ethics, i think are incredibly above the standard of what we've gotten used to. i think he would have been better off if somebody had -- the minute the chief of staff mcdonough got ahold of this information, the preliminary report, he should have walked in there, get on top of this. this is the galloping horse of history. i only got an early report on this. i just heard of it. the first time

host: if he were to go to the front page of "the washington post closed " this morning -- "the washington post" this morning -- ronald from cincinnati, the mall for waiting on our independent line. caller: this is all just mudslinging. [indiscernible] why should they work for us? we cannot afford. page benghazi on the front of the new york times. the headline -- there is a follow-up story taking a look of the political side of this. this story centers on the former secretary of state hillary clinton and her possible political ambitions for running for the white house. the last couple of paragraphs -- on tomorrow's program we are going to have cheryl atkins on. ead stories of the li on benghazi. she will take your questions on information that came up this week. you can join us on tomorrow's washington journal. baron from missouri, you are on our democrats live. a believe the irs is underpaid and overworked. they are so little people doing so much work. with the tea party is close to treason as possible in some ways -- i would investigate them too. it does not make any sense. morning'sory

you worked at the "washington post" and were a staff writer in the new yorker.ecoming a mother prompt you to withdrawal from daily journalism. you talk about turning down assign s at times? >> yes. working at the new yorker you have a lot more control over your life and one of the things i recognize about my life and sherl sandberg's life is we have a lot of flexibility and options and choices that most other women don't. >> you are both in affluent families, let's face it. >> affluent families, a lot of help and resources which most women don't have. for me what i recognized it didn't matter that much to the bigger world whether or not my article came out today, yesterday, in a week. but what really mattered to my daughter is that i was more present and it really mattered to me. so i did cut back, not completely but in a way that i could be a full participant in her life. >> it is hard when you are wrapped up with the daily deadlines of journalism. you write success, the kind sandberg calls for requires more travel and ever more time in the office. >> i'm older

you can find her articles at "washington post".com and if you want, you can follow her on twitter at sarah kliff, thank you for being on the program. guest: thank you. host: coming up on this edition of the "washington journal", our weekly your money series continues with a look at workplace safety with jim morris of the center for public integrity. but first, another update from c-span radio: >> the six educators who were killed in the elementary school shootings in newtown, connecticut will be awarded the congressional medal of honor today. the congressional medal of honor society says those six women exem plified courage, sacrifice, and selflessness, in trying to protect the students from the gunman at sandy hook elementary school in december. twenty students were killed. the joint committee on taxation today is expected to release a report, giving an overview of possible changes to the tax code. that's based on the work of 11 bipartisan working groups who have been studying the tax system. >>> and finally, a pair of president obama's second term cabinet nominees could move closer

you did the same thing to james rosen and so far, the washington post reporting that fox news chief washingtonorrespondent james rosen was specifically targeted with government trackers monitoring his every move in the justice department. and the subponas that they needed to track james by effectively identifying him as a potential criminal. and just in the last half-hour, we learned william lodgenes and a fox news producer were looked into their leaks. lageunness. >> with these new revelations about the justice department and fbi into our colleague james rosen, the fbi agent that had filed in his opinion rosen had committed a crime by working to obtain from a source in the state department. the agent writes that he believes that the evident that rosen had broken the law. at the very least as an aider or abetter or co-- conspirator. rosen said he was never conducted by the government despite the investigation including obtaining a search warrant for his personal e-mail but tracking his movement by tracking the security badge when he came and went from theitate department. the inspector general

reading the "the washington post" and reading your paper, jennifer. on him maybe this wasn't the right thing. yet you see brad wood house of the democratic national committee tweeting out a message saying these news organizations have decided not to meet with holder. kind of forefits your right to gripe. your thoughts about that? >> yeah. if things could have gotten worse they did with that. basically, he was trying to bully the media isn't that a common pattern in this administration to showing up and saying somehow that the "new york times" couldn't complain because they didn't agree though these crazy ground rules. well, that, of all people, brought the aclu into the fight. castigating the obama administration. so would you -- we now have very strange situation with the jennifer and the aclu and the "new york times" are all on the same page. i don't think the administration is doing something right if all of those folks with very different views find their behavior objectionable. >> megyn: that's what i said earlier. it's not every day that we at f

>>> joining me "washington post" susan page and "washington post" political reporter, nia malika hendersone meeting with eric holder. you're one of the news executives who are going to be meeting with the justice department. the nbc position as you know was not to meet in an off-the-record context. this particular subject. i know there are off-the-record meetings all the time. but the sense we get is that holder and the justice department want to kind of revisit the rules of the road. >> well we know from the meeting this is one of a series of meetings they've had at least three. one of the them yesterday, we know from the reporters and journalists, the editors who came out of the meeting yesterday, that there was a talk about how, what the department of justice guidelines are for pursuing reporters, trying to get subpoenas and email and phone records and elsewhere. talk about the shield law and how that might work. so i'm, we're going, we're very interested to hear what the attorney general has to say. we think these are important issues and important to discuss. >> and nia malika, we've

he's also the chief correspondent at the "washington post." id sanger is the chief washington correspondent of the "new york times." we're trying to catch him before they haul him off to jail because he has some pretty good leaks that he's been reporting on at the "new york times." and, of course, our own political director john dickerson. john, you don't seem to be in trouble. >> well, not yet, but i haven't started talking yet, bob. ( laughter ). >> schieffer: well, i don't know where we start this morning. let's start with this whole business. lois, this whole business with the president suddenly all these controversies that he is finding himself engulfed in. and then we hear the white house say this morning, they have given out orders they'll devote only 10% of their time dealing with these issues. >> yeah, i'd like to see that. handicap. a second term presidency by its very definition, the president is on the clock. every day he's losing power, and this just accelerates that clock. so it's distracting. it's impact his ability to execute hi

it's like screaming "liar, liar," at least if you're the "washington post," your thoughts?> it's a stunning conclusion by the fact checker, a good reporter. that press conference yesterday in a number of respects and benghazi was something i never saw before. you know, in connection with the talking points, either obama was briefed on this mountain of statements that he and others made after september the 11th, or if he was not, he is vonned by complete incompetence. if he was briefed and said we always knew it was terrorism, then that is a lie. there's no other way. lou: it is a -- it is an obvious contradiction what he said on the 12th of september, what then proceeded to transpire, the 15th and 16th of september leading up to rice's brazen story and narrative supported by the administration. them to the 19th, to the 2 # nd when the president, you know, gave a briefing, correcting, all of that, still pushed the silly video nonsense and held on to it righteously. at this point, how could he say there's no there there because the contradictions are numerous and immense. >>

>> if the washington post had exhibited this in 1973 nixon would have been a two-term president. that's the same for the mainstream media. we are doing exactly what they wanted. i don't give it to the lower level. we were proving all of the people that have kept this story alive and there is a real story there. the testimony was riveting. it has made hillary clinton be a liar. it shows that obama has no foreign policy, and they tried to find -- they mentioned chick fillet. physical -- chick-fil-a. if you have never had chick-fil-a, i mean, it is the food of the gods. >> demographics are for those who use the hash tag bill schulz. they share a couple things in common, they live in alleys and collect twine. >> that is a terrible thing to say about the head of the amtrak pr, bill schulz. i happened to get the twitter name first. i apologize, sir. that was scurlous. >> you don't even know what scurlous means. >> it is the same as besmirch. >>> from benghazi to been purring. they tried to turn housecats into. spies. popular science magazine shows operation uh could acoustic kitty aime

and that was also done in the "the washington post" this morning. article in the paper about the irs scandal clearly planted by the white house. it said the president was not in the loop, that his top advisors kept irs information from him for a variety of reasons. fascinating footnote is that david plouffe a fervent supporter of the president attacked lanny davis for saying this about kathryn ruemmler who admits she knew well in advance about the irs abuse. >> i don't know ms. ruemmler but they don't think about anything more than the legal issues. it's an investigation. we are not going to share the conclusions. you don't have to. just give a heads up and do crisis management planning. >> so, davis gets hammered by obama acolytes for saying that. i don't get it so the white house strategy is clear. the president did not know anything about the irs targeting conservative groups. even though his top advisors did. also new information from the daily caller web site, it says ms. ruemmler met with christophered me, chief counsel for the treasury depart

unitedhealthcare. >>> joining me now is "washington post" reporter david mcelmore.cain made a surprise visit to syrian rebels. is this helping the situation or could he actually be undermining the president? >> i think it's important to know he has a strong history of foreign policy involvement, but it's rare and unusual for politicians to kind of go out and do their own freelancing in this way because the president has his own agenda and he's in a tricky situation with syria. the white house is talking about they are undertaking national security to see if the government there used chemical weapons and i think it is a bit of a concern if you have someone from the other party out there trying to find out on his own. i'm not sure it's the most helpful for the white house. >> president obama plans to fill three court of appeals say can sis all at once. that's likely to unleash fierce opposition because republican senators. to eliminate those spots. how will this play out? >> the president has trouble getting normminees on to the courts. he recently did get one nominee

and i have just seen it happen over and over. >> joining me now is "the washington post" reporter whouncovered the story, jana johnson and lyn povitch -- how the women of "newsweek" sued their bosses and changed the workplace. jenna, give us the background for people who don't follow wall street, who is paul tudor jones? >> he's a legend. he's made a lot of money over the years, he's the found over tudoo investments and he's also well known in fill lant by -- by investing in health care, food programs and education. >> 104th i think on the forbes richest list, so somebody who's been very successful. but people who were watching this in the newsroom were absolutely stunned that he would say this, and there almost seemed to be like a nervous laughter in the room, don't you think. >> exactly. if you just watch the body language of the men who are on stage with him, they all kind of seem to be shifting away from him. but none of them said, you're wrong, paul, that notes the way it should be. >> lynne says if a woman doesn't have a baby she -- >> first of all it reminded me that women are

"iron man" the washington post front-page story on this. -- and the washington post here's what presidentbama said yesterday when asked about the issue. [video clip] >> i am directly spoken to secretary to chuck hagel today and indicated to him that we are just to have to not step up our game, we have to exponentially a step up our game to go at this thing hard. for those who are in uniform who have experienced sexual assault, i want them to hear directly from their commander- in-chief that i've got their them, andill support we're not going to tolerate this mess. and there will be accountability people engaged in this behavior should be prosecuted. military with knowledge of this should understand this is not who we are and this is not what the u.s. military is about and it dishonors the vast majority of men and women in uniform who carry out their responsibilities and obligations with honor and dignity and incredible courage every day. >> "usa today" front-page story -- that is what the defense secretary proposed yesterday at his own news conference, talking about this issue. caller our

says "the washington post" -- guest: yes, again, we really have no idea.y say that security is not going to be curbed for that. how is it not if they are going to have furloughs? host: ralph, a republican, new york. caller: hello. and i haveng in, been listening to the show, and it sounds good. the thing i am concerned with, sequestration, in other words, they were able to find money at the parks. it sounds like -- in which the president would be more -- i wish the president would be more engaged -- i think he should've taken the republicans up on the take some ofally where you think it would leave our country less formal and give it to state parks -- vulnerable and give it to state parks and the new medicare thing. that is where all the money is going. i would like some response. i think he should be more engaged instead of blaming congress over time. i think democrats and republicans are blaming each other. have prettyhey much, both sides, have pretty much given up on stopping sequestration by september 30. if they do not come to an agreement by the end

it got four pinnochios from "the washington post." that's hard to do even in washington. i mean, you know, people say that washington is the place where shame goes to die. and this is an exact instance of that. >> okay, congressman, to kbruz your expression, may i get a word in here, please. let me ask you a question, if i may. i want to talk to you about a controversy, a continuing controversy about the talking points that came out afterwards that led some people to say to a lot of disinformation. these are the talking points the administration put out after the attack. we do know that islamic extremists with ties to al qaeda participated in the attack. invest the first draft of talking points to the cia on september 14. but after objections from state and after the white house had a meeting, you can see the talking points -- it's a little hard to see on the screen, there's lots of lines drawn through them. heavily edited and all mention islamic extremists were taken out. congressman lynch, were the talking points the administration put out in advance rice's appearance,

charles lane of the washington post. nina easton from fortune magazine and fox news political analyst juan williams. this all started back in 2009 when james rosen our colleague here at fox news report on north korea's nuclear ambitions. so to find out who leaked the story, the justice department south a search warrant and in the affidavit they said this. he will put it up on the screen again. there is probable cause to believe the reporter has committed a violation of the espionage act either as an aider abetor and or co-conspirator are. 0bonspiratorrecognize seal james l rosen is a suspected to be involved in the conspiracy, illegally, to disclose classified information. that is treating him fox that purpose, as a criminal. that does not square with what holder told congress. not only about the standards he would use, but, also about his own involvement. it will be argued that he was lying. at a minimum, i would say it is another example of him being untrustworthy and, also, bumbling. it cannot be reconciled. the presi

the "the washington post" called it a whopper. and gave up four pinocchios. i called it a lie. it is. it is transparently a lie. >> bill: why do you think then the president is putting his reputation on the line. >> i don't know. >> and people like you in the "the washington post" who support the president, why do you think he is doing that? you must have some thought about it. there has got to be a reason the man is putting his whole reputation on the line here. >> i don't know if he he doesn't remember what he he said but the he is playing word games. it's getting old. you have a situation where you have the "new york times" reporting on september 20th, that's the first time the white house used the word terrorism in connection with an attack. this is not up for opinion. it's a fact. he was asked in an interview with steve croft right afterwards. >> bill: you are dodging my question. >> i can't get inside his head and know why he does it. >> bill: he has white house counsel to remind him what he says. all right? he has speech writers who put on paper what he said and what he

clinton yates is the local news editor for "washington post" express. to see you again. >> good to see you too bill. how are you? >> bill: i'm great. >> i got my shirt -- >> i noticed you've got your shirt on backwards. >> back with a little slack for chris kelly who passed last night. he was found dead, former -- not former member. member of the hip-hop duo kris kross. he was only 34 years old. >> that was stunning. they had a couple of songs. i wore out the cassette when i had it, when i was a kid. >> one of the things i was explaining to people is it is hard to understand the impact they had on hip-hop. in '92, at that time, rap was sort of -- not a strange place but you're talking about public enemy. people viewed rap as a dangerous kind of medium. so for them to be a group made up of kids, making age-appropriate mainstream music for kids, it was hugely popular completely changed the way people looked at sort of the genre, especially for like i said a generation of kids that grew up. it was all that they knew. middle school dances, elementary school

agents turns out according to the washington post to have been on the arm so clearly the f.b.i. is going to have a lot of questions to answer in the coming days with these new developments on this story. argy has been covering this case and the controversy surrounding it from the outset we've got all the details as well as our interview with the father of the man who was killed on our website at r.t. dot com. some attention flares between the u.s. and china as president obama gets set to confront chinese leader xi jinping over hacker attacks on american military networks meanwhile reports say washington's launch massive preparations for an all out cyber war now the u.s. department of homeland security is a recruiting hackers opening arbor to forty thousand job vacancies for cyber warriors cash is flowing into by the tools to send out of the digital attacks but mostly to infiltrate computer network overseas with three billion dollars spent on cyber security last year the u.s. is building up forty teams of cyber agents of thirteen among them assigned to launch attacks or g.'s dama

"the washington post."ording to a new study federal taxpayers employ more low income workers than walmart and mcdonald combined. 2 million people make under $24,000 a year. by comparison walmart and mcdonald's have 1.4 millions such employees. if the contractor's pay goes up the report shows wages of federal employees do not. >> one of the new net jobs at the labor department were added in april came in low wage sectors. a study last year found that low wage occupations accounted for 1 in 5 jobs lost during the recession. but they accounted for 3 out of 5 jobs that have been added in the recovery. again, the jobs that are coming in are majority low wage jobs. this is a generational shift and massive problem. >> then the other element of it, the people who have lost jobs that they had held most of their lifetimes and between the ages of 45 and 55. those jobs are never coming back. they might be chronically unemployed. >> begun related homicide fell 40% in last 20 years and other gun crime is down. more than

agents turns out according to the washington post to have been on the arm so clearly the f.b.i. is going to have a lot of. questions to answer in the coming days with these new developments on this story. our g. has been covering this case and the controversy surrounding it from the outset and we've got all the details as well as our interview with the father of the man who was killed on our web site r.t. dot com. to the u.k. now where one of the alleged machete killers who had to be british soldier to death on a london street has been officially charged with murder michael adebowale who will appear in court in late on thursday the gruesome killing has added to the anti muslim and to immigrant sentiments in the country and authorities are now increasingly under fire for dumping the race and religion factor in crimes and a tory assaults with six grooming ring case being one of the most recent examples are to support you boycott explains. across the country many have been shocked at the uncovered sexual exploitation rings first in rochdale then brother and darby and most recently

the "the washington post" called it a whopper. and gave up four pinocchios. i called it a lie. it is. it is transparently a lie. >> bill: why do you think then the president is putting his reputation on the line. >> i don't know. >> and people like you in the "the washington post" who support the president, why do you think he is doing that? you must have some thought about it. there has got to be a reason the man is putting his whole reputation on the line here. >> i don't know if he he doesn't remember what he he said but the he is playing word games. it's getting old. you have a situation where you have the "new york times" reporting on september 20th, that's the first time the white house used the word terrorism in connection with an attack. this is not up for opinion. it's a fact. he was asked in an interview with steve croft right afterwards. >> bill: you are dodging my question. >> i can't get inside his head and know why he does it. >> bill: he has white house counsel to remind him what he says. all right? he has speech writers who put on paper what he said and what he