washington post new york times wall street journal and i could go on they're not they don't allow us to use skype and they don't allow google search so let's go back and say you want to be fair this is how we can be fair and christy made a very good point about the fact that the irony of it is actually while weigh them will become stronger in china. but the thing is it's the chinese also that are scared the chinese are so scared that's why they banned even facebook on top of all the things i mentioned so what's important here so look at fairness the chinese have never been fair that's not my personal opinion that's just the simple fact they can open up their markets and open up ours i think sean was one of the 1st presidents to actually say wait a 2nd we're not going to do this here if we can't do that there that's what he's been saying whether it's the e.u. or whether it's china let's be fair open up china and let's have a different discussion but they're not going to do that this ban is coming from the same place as the ban on the hallway at that place of fear that the u.s. is no l

washington post new york times wall street journal and i could go on they're not they don't allow us to use skype and they don't allow google search so let's go back and say you want to be fair this is how we can be fair and christy made a very good point about the fact that the irony of it is actually while weigh them will become stronger in china but the thing is it's the chinese also that are scared the chinese are so scared that's why they ban even facebook on top of all the things i mentioned so what's important here so look at fairness the chinese have never been fair that's not my personal opinion that's just the simple fact they can open up their markets and open up ours i think john was one of the 1st presidents to actually say wait a 2nd we're not going to do this here if we can't do that there that's what he's been saying whether it's the e.u. or whether it's china let's be fair open up china and that's a different discussion but they're not going to do that. you know when we're talking about these chinese tech companies we've seen the u.k. kind of follow the lead of the u

maybe a few, the "washington post," wall street journal, "new york times" that's about it. i'm a fourth-generation newspaperman. they are all dying. they are losing their audience. they are being replaced by citizen journalism. there are no professional standards in the world. you don't know if you can trust them or if that blogger with their own opinion but. my hope is that begins to sort itself out as we develop feedback and maintenance in the tools and technique is to determine what is real news in fake news. it's a tough time for us. i think you should be able to say anything you want if 10 million people are saying everything they want, that is the chaos we are in right now. >> as current events here, donald trump is threatening to take away the protections from technology companies through executive order. i don't know if that is possible legally, but he has added that debate for the audience members who don't know what section 230 is, section 230 is the communication decency act. it gets tech companies out of any liabilities for what is published on their platform. th

even the new york times gave a great coverage today. wall street journal, washington post, everybody was saying great. this is something we have been working very hard on. i saw where sleepy joe tried to claim credit. i'm try to figure out how that works. they made a terrible deal with iran. it was a horror show and i ended it. they gave $150 billion for nothing. they got nothing from that deal. they did nothing just like they , have been weak on china, they have been weak on russia, they been weak on everyone, most of all iran. that was a great deal by talented people who work with me and it has been praised all over the world. what you will see is other countries will come into that deal and you will have peace in the middle east. joe biden doesn't even know the name of the countries i am talking about. thank you very much. >> house speaker nancy pelosi and senate majority leader chuck schumer issued a joint statement after the president's news conference reacting to remarks about funding the post office. they say that comments affirm that no patriotic tradition is immun

trump: we announced the deal, and i appreciate that even "the new york times" gave it great coverage, "the wall street journal," "the washington post," and this is something we haven't working hard on, and this -- we have been working hard on, and sleepy joe tried to take credit for it. what they did is made a terrible deal with iran, and the deal was a horror show, and i ended it. they gave them $1.8 million in cash for nothing. they got nothing from that deal except trouble. they did nothing, and just like they have been weak on china, they have been weak on russia and week on everyone, and they were the weakest of all on iran. it was a great deal made by very talented people who work with me, and it has been praised all over the world, and what you will see now is other countries will come into that deal, and you will have peace in the least, and he does not even know the name of the countries i am talking about. thank you very much, everyone. >> >> house speaker nancy pelosi and senate majority leader chuck schumer -- minority leader chuck schumer reacted to the president's announcements. plain he willmade manipulate the operat

group called digital context next that represents such entities as the "new york times," "washington post," "wall street journal fox news media, digital media, they all say the 30% commission apple charges on in-app purchases is too high and the letter goes on to say look, we want the same deal you gave to amazon. amazon worked out a compromise at 15%. why don't we get 15%? it's weird, though, because bezos owns amazon but also has "the washington post." very interesting. apple maintains that that level is fair considering all it does to maintain the site and the way it operates it. this is an issue that's just not going away, stu. stuart: no, it's not. it's a long-running feud. thanks, ash. the market overall friday morning, few minutes to go before we open up, the dow is unchanged. a few minutes ago it was down 100. the nasdaq has turned positive. 13. interesting day going on here. >>> let's see what else. the opening of the market after this. ♪ introducing stocks by the slice from fidelity. now you can trade stocks and etfs for any amount you choose instead of buying by the share. all with no commissions. st

is banned in china the wall street journal is banned in china the new the washington post is but banned in china the new york times is banned in china in china you cannot use what any personal communications and you can't use skype you can't use google search so the chinese saying they want to be fair if so goody goody let's be fair they can open up their markets. to c.n.n. b.b.c. washington post new york times was street journal and i could go on they're not they don't allow us to use skype and they don't allow google search so let's go back and say you want to be fair this is how we can be fair and christy made a very good point about the fact that the irony of it is actually while weigh them will become stronger in china but the thing is it's the chinese also that are scared the chinese are so scared that's why they ban even facebook on top of all the things i mentioned so what's important here so look at fairness the chinese have never been fair that's not my personal opinion that's just the simple fact they can open up their markets and open up ours i think is one of the 1st presidents to actually say wait a

>> he announced it -- i appreciate it, even "the new york times" gave it great coverage and editorials. "wall street journal," "washington postbody was saying great. and this is something we have been working very hard on. and i saw where sleepy joe tried to claim credit for it, and i'm trying to figure out how that one works. what he did is they made a terrible deal with iran. and the deal was a horror show, and i ended it. they gave them $150 billion for nothing. they gave them $1.8 billion in cash for nothing. they got nothing from that deal except trouble. they did nothing. just like they have been weak on china, they have been weak on russia. they have been weak on everyone, and they were the weakest of all on iran. no, that was a great deal made by very talented people that work with me. and it's been praised all over the world. and what you'll see now is other countries will come into that deal, and you'll have peace in the middle east. biden doesn't even know, he doesn't even know the name of the countries i'm talking about. thank you very much, everybody. >> there you go. we just heard from president trump. he had a

>> president trump: i appreciate it, even "the new york times" gave great coverage in the editorials today. "wall street journal," "washington postrybody was saying it. great. this is something we been working very hard on. i saw where sleepy joe tried to claim credit for it. i'm trying to figure out how that one works. what he did, they made a terrible deal with iran. the deal was a horror show, and i ended it. they gave them $150 billion for nothing. they give them $1.8 billion in cash for nothing. they got nothing from that deal except trouble. they did nothing. just like they have been weak on china, they've been weak on russia, they've been weak on everyone, and they were the weakest of all on iran. no, that was a great deal made by very talented people that work with me, and it's been praised all over the world. what you'll see now is other countries will come into that deal and you have peace in the middle east. biden doesn't even know the name of the countries i'm talking about. thank you very much, everybody. >> reporter: [inaudible question] >> harris: the president of the united states giving some brief remarks off the

the new york times is a washington post said this has all been debunked and they criticized you for what you said. the truth is, and never really has been an investigation and the wall street journal an editorial in the the project is a scandal for which the family hasn't paid a political price. we should be investigating this. pam: hopefully justice is looking into it. i think they are looking into a lot of things that's been going on so we will have to say see what happens. >> with respect to the fact that the sun made all that money, i suspect there would be other agencies in addition to justice, treasury as well as other departments, correct? pam: they said no, was a dormant investigation and joe biden happened to have this prosecutor fired, you know why it was dormant? oligarchs fled the country and he was in norway. guess who was with him, under biden. judge jeanine: amazing. absolutely amazing. good for you. i want you to listen to some sound, this is new york's attorney general talking about president trump. >> i'll never be afraid to challenge this illegitimate president. we must do our jobs to ensure the man currently occupying the oval office is held accountable to any

we announced a deal and i appreciate, even the "new york times" gave it great coverage in editorials today. "wall street journal," "washington postbody was saying great. this is something we have been working very hard on. and i saw where sleepy joe tried to claim credit for it and i'm trying to figure out how that one works. what he did is they made a terrible deal with iran and the deal was a horror show and i ended it. they gave them $150 billion for nothing. they gave them $1.8 billion in cash for nothing. they got nothing from that deal except trouble. they did nothing. just like they have been weak on china, they have been weak on russia, they have been weak on everyone and they were the weakest of all on iran. no, that was a great deal made by very talented people that work with me, and it's been praised all over the world and what you will see now is other countries will come into that deal and you will have peace in the middle east. biden doesn't even know -- he doesn't even know the name of the countries i'm talking about. thank you very much, everybody. reporter: [ inaudible ]. neil: all right. just listening to the pr

new york times" and "the washington post" which you should not have. host: why? for a: they were sued quarter of a billion dollars a piece. "the we also read from wall street journaland fox news as well. [indiscernible] host: we cannot hear you. you are muffled. speak into the phone, terry. caller: can you hear me now? host: yes. we also quote from "the wall street journal," fox news. caller: they did not try to destroy somebody's life. destroy aally lied to child's life. abc, cbs, nbc is on the chopping block. politico is on the chopping block. host: i have heard of the story. caller: they should be pulled off the air. to every democrat out there listens to these scumbags, that will destroy a child's life because they disagree with politics, you are scum. ust: we go to louis joining from massachusetts. we are trying to focus on covid-19, but what are your thoughts? caller: covid-19. i believe the president is doing a good job. he caught it early. he was criticized very heavily. he takes a lot of good steps order to cover us, in order to protect this country, and i believe 90% of the media is against him. 10% is with him. i would like to reach out to everybody who

wall street journal editorial, column by rich lowry in the new york post. washington examiner. and columnar by a former postal oner of the service appearing in "the new york times". four make it reason for them bringing this legislation is they're and what proposing would make it difficult to reform. i rise to oppose the rule. it actually violates the rules that my friends passed at the congress.of this the legislation before us has not gone through any committee, been marked up, not been debated, not been amended. my friends said at the beginning wouldn't gress they bring legislation like that but hey conveniently waived that yesterday so here it comes with no committee procedure or markup. we had a number of amendments, adam speaker, that were presented, you know, to the committee. none were made in order. i offered an amendment for open rule where any member could come down here and put forward what they better idea be a since we had no opportunity to committee. that, too, was rejected. this rule is a take it or leave it ultimatum from the majority. it means you can pass it in the house but it's not going anywhere else. ow, let's turn to the bill itself. my