i'm going to waurn guys about that in advance. let's listen to senator harry reid.argument. >> as i understand the law, the presiding officer once used the name redskins to sell some shirts you can do that. there's no trademark anymore for the redskins. >> is that true? could it be that anyone who wants to print up t-shirts, either pro or con, the team logo and the name on it could do so at will? >> well, if this ruling today from the u.s. pat sxent trademark office is upheld via the many layers of appeal, and it will take years, the difference, though, between now and the last time that the u.s. patent and trademark office reached this same conclusion ultimately overturned on appeal, the court of public opinion far more mobilized. so i think that whether and to what extent we ever see a bunch of average fans selling teams with the name on it -- or selling merchandise with the name on it because it's no longer protected or eventually won't be protected, that i think is a smaller issue than what this ruling means to the many out there who oppose the name. how much fu