i think inspector waush has been very diligent in trying to work with her. she's not complied or she's complied only enough to get through inspection and she's already had one suspension. what i find very troubling is the fact that she reopened without any authorization and also took down the suspension sign. to me that's egregious. the entire timeline convinces me that this is a textbook case for revocation. >> i would echo everything commissioner hurtado just said. >> the same here. i think that the suggestion of a suspension didn't work in the past, i don't think it's going to work now. the multiple times that inspector waush has been out there, i think she understand what needs to be done and continues not to do it. i see a pattern that is more than likely is not going to change. >> no comment. >> so i would move to deny the appeal on the basis that the revocation was more than appropriate under the circumstances. >> we have a motion then from commissioner hurtado to deny the appeal and uphold this revocation on the basis that said revocation is more tha