so this is a wavelength, wavelength, wavelength. kinda easy stuff. so when you talk about the wavelength of a wave-- when i say wavelength of a wave, we'll all be talking about the same thing, yeah? okay. there's another thing with a vibration too. there's something vibrating here. okay? now, the vibration has a frequency. what do you suppose the frequency is, gang? you say, "what do you mean what the frequency is?" it's a vibration, what you said." what's the value? what's the numerical value of the frequency? well, the frequency would be how many cycles per second. let's start here. about one per second. what do you get, lee? it will hit about one per second. one point what? one per second. well, let's just say, one per second. yeah. if it swings back and forth, one time per second, then its vibration frequency is one vibration per second. ain't that neat? or we can say one cycle per second. got that? or we could say, one avis-- no, no, no, no, wait, one hertz. [laughter] okay? one hertz is a shortcut name for one vibration per second. you get it?

and those small wavelengths can discern a thing. you know about how they send the sound waves into the stomach of a person having a baby, something like that. you don't want to send x-rays, do you? i mean, unless you don't like the kid already. [laughter] ultrasound waves, really, really neat. this ultrasound go right through, reflect and give the information, echoes, huh? the echoes of high-frequency sounds. and guess what maneuvers the same way in the sky at night time. begin with a b, end with at. - bats. - bats. right on. bats do the same thing. how do the bats catch little insects on the fly? they send out beep, beep, beep, beep. the beep hits the insect, bounces off, be-beep. beep. got. ain't that nice? ain't that nice? picks it up by sonar, sonar. that means radar echo. lee. why when lower frequency sounds tell you where the insects-- a lower frequency not so good because a lower frequency is a long wavelength. remember we talked it before about seeing things small with long wavelengths like atoms? you just can't do it. detai

. >> this is a much longer wavelength of light than we could see with eyes. this means we can detect things that they're not even visible to optical telescopes. this is advantageous for #projects. -- for a number of science projects. >> they can see the formation of stars and planets and galaxies created billions of years ago. the first image shows a pair of distorted spiral galaxies, 17 million light years away. the telescope can also be used to examine the makeup of objects in space and identify individual chemical molecules. , those elements have radiofrequency is, which is what the antenna will capture. $1.3 billion project is a collaboration between countries in north america, europe, and asia. once fully operational, there are hundreds of scientists wanting used it. it.anting to use >> it covers objects in the andr system like moons galaxies, so it's a little bit of everything. >> researchers say the telescope is perfect for examining clouds of dust and earth-size planets. bill seitz will give them an unprecedented view of the universe and a better unde

this is just getting the horse in front trying to get wavelengths to disappear.now on microwaves, but they're going to get -- >> could it happen? could they get to the point -- >> i think so. >> i'm thinking military will be in on that. >> you got that first one of course. and something if you have a microwave spectrometer and you're trying to look at something and you can make something be invisible, especially in a building or safehouse to someone trying to look in, there might be other applications. >> you're thinking of more fun things, aren't you? >> yeah. we could do it to lara, you can show i can simply disappear. >> i was guys on friday when i do the headlines at cnn international i have to do it in front of the weather wall, i always forget and wear blue. they get so mad at me because my whole body disappears. >> yeah. all you have is the tie. >> we digress. chad myers, thank you. >> fun stuff. >>> the world's most expensive penthouse. pool, water slide, all this stuff. >> sounds like your place. >> not really. we're going to show you pictures up next. [

i just called them dds--desire disorders, which means that the whole wavelength of thinking about sex enough to feel sexual was ssing, that there were other priorities in the mind of the individual. what causes a desire disorder? the way jan tells their story, it was mel's snoring, but she knows something more serious was going on.order? i must have been going through some difficult times of my own at that time, because married to somebody for over 2o years, i certainly would have heard m snore at some point those first 19 years. we then had to deal with anger, which is a big wall that builds up like brick-by-brick sentment between couples. there's hot anger in the bedroom if couples say nasty things to each other, and there's anger if you didn't do anything about it. in a lot oinstances when we were having these difficulties, jan didn't want any kind of a relationship-- physical, particularly. if the flings are d, th notng is right, and it makes it very difficult for them to get together. those are real everyday problems. life is a road that is filled witemotional potholes. i'm the t

mary and jesus were entirely on the same wavelength where it concerned resurrection. at a later period, the view of resurrection became more and more physical, but it is interesting that the earlest writer to speak of the resurrection who is st. paul also agrees with mary magdalene and jesus. he says that the resurrection has to be understood as spiritual and not as physical. >> you know what your word are awakening here. they awaken the thought of where is the body? where did jesus' corpse go? it is not reanimated corpse we know about or we should be knowing about in the resurrection. to say nothing about how this shatters the belief of so many christians everywhere, right? >> that's exactly the case. what i would like to assure those who believe in a physical resurrection is that within the gospels, there are some depictions, but all of them later than mary magdalene's experience. i'm talking about encounters with risen jesus. some of them when they done involve mary magdalene, are characterized by a physical existence. for example, he eats with his disciples aer hi

i want to come to justice breyer's point because i think he is on a somewhat different wavelength, whichis isn't this a mere continuation? showed shouldn't affect the paddock before me must strive or until someone is satisfied in the problem is cured? >> you don't change horses. you renew within the past where it works as long as the problem isn't solved. >> i think the problem to which the voting rights act was addressed to solved. look at the registration and voting. that is an absolute disposability basis. that is like saying if i detect a disease affiliate in 1865 and i have a radical treatment that may help cure that disease when it comes to 2005 naca new disease, why not apply the old treatment? >> that is the question, isn't it? the problem has been solved, but who just make that judgment really? is that you, the court or congress? >> is certainly not me. >> that's a good answer. i was hoping you would say that. last mac >> congress can examine it. congress makes the record. it's up to the court to determine whether it has been solved. >> that's a big new power are giving us that

. >> bill: it means that you and i are on the same wavelength on the fiscal chaos issue. you are talking abouten oyour radio show and on your internet program and, of course, this week i caused all kinds of problems by talking about it on the factor. so beck and i see the danger here but this two parts to my question. number one, it's hard to convince people who don't pay attention that there is a danger because you can't really see it it's not like there is a mountain lion on your front yard. theoretical well we are going to go bankrupt and people are going well, i can't see it how do we sell this? >> hang on just a second. i just want to make sure i'm right. that bill o'reilly is asking me how you tell people of a danger something that's in the future that you can't really prove? i mean, this is ironic. bill. it really is. >> bill: no. you can prove it. it's not like you saying that the communists are going to take over the country and all of that. >> they are. >> bill: $17 trillion debt, which is going to be 20 when barack obama gets out of office. that's how you can p

that wavelength, frequency. it turns out-- well, i won't even talk about wave under this point. let me just talk about frequency. that sun: high temperature or low temperature? high. the earth: relatively, high or low? low. now it turns out that everything is emitting waves: you and me and everything else that has a temperature above absolute zero. everything is emitting waves, and everything is absorbing waves. we're just gonna concentrate on the sun and the earth for now 'cause we're running out of time. the frequency of waves emitted by the sun are very, very high. the sun's temperature is like this. so the frequency of waves is like that. so high, millions of billions of cycles per second. [makes sounds] and we call that light. and that's--and light carries energy. electromagnetic energy. high, high frequency. why is it high frequency so high it's called light? because the temperature of the sun is very, very high. okay? now that light comes down and... [makes sounds] ...hits the earth. and so the earth warms up. but the earth reradiates that energy back out. but what freque

they more or less are on the same wavelength when it comes to israel's security.nd the two of them are going to do the best they can to make this trip a success for their own domestic political reasons as well. >> dana, ten years ago, as you know, we started a war on the basis of false information. today we're looking at a war in syria where the question of who is using chemical weapons, even if they are using them, can't be confirmed. is it your view, dana, that our reluctance to engage in syria is a direct result of our experience in iraq? >> well, certainly it's a response to that, martin, but also the situation in syria is a lot more ambiguous and is not exactly clear what can be done there. but certainly the hesitation in responding here, not necessarily hesitation, but a skepticism about whether reports are to be believed or not, is very specifically a reaction to the gullibility that was expressed a little over ten years ago that led us into that war. so that's why there is every reason to be taking this cautiously and slowly, precisely because the administ

and i kind of knew immediately that he was just somebody that worked on the same wavelength as me andl be able to go chat with him, we know each other's names. >> you're definitely connected for a long time at this point. >> right. >> and this fund you set up, we checked it before we came to this segment. we're now at almost $184,000. people are still giving. probably not what you imagined in terms of a number. >> no. i mean, we set it up because a lot of people who had been touched by the story had expressed interest in helping billy ray. we set the goal for $1,000. i was hoping to achieve maybe $4,000, because that's what he was offered on the spot for the ring. and we had no idea. >> yeah. >> no idea. >> and i know that's obviously a nice by-product of all of this, billy ray. the biggest thing for you, obviously, your family. you just saw your sister robin there. if they're watching this morning, anything you'd like to say? >> i'd like to say hello, sis. the rest of my family. they can all see that i'm fine now. >> mm-hmm. >> i'm glad we've all got in touch with each other. hectic

i think he is on a somewhat different wavelength. is this not be mere continuation? should not be fact we have had it before me and let's try it a little bit more until somebody is satisfied the problem is cured? >> do not change horses. you renew what is in the past. where it works as long as the problem is not solved. >> i think the problem to which the voting rights act was addressed is resolved. registration is solved on a absolute as well as relative basis. that is like saying, if i detect there is a disease of foot in the population in 1965 and i have a radical treatment that may help cure the diseased, when it comes to 2005 and i see a new disease or i think the old disease has gone, why not apply the old treatment? >> that is the question. you said the problem has been solved. who gets to make that judgment, really? is it you? is it the court? or is it congress? >> it is certainly not me. [laughter] >> that is a good answer. >> the question is, congress can examine it. is this up to the court to determine whether the problem indeed has been solved and whether

. >> you guys are on the same wavelength. >> stephanie: i think that was the boner. [ mumbling ] >> glug meet the press, right? that man, hey -- hey you! [ laughter ] >> stephanie: that's the sound we heard in john boner's dressing room in meet the press this weekend. [ glugging sound ] >> stephanie: shelley in [ inaudible ]. hi shelley. >> caller: hi, steph. i just wanted to let you know -- first i'll say hi to jim and chris, and kathleen you are the bomb. we saw you at the comedyfest a couple of weeks ago in traverse city. it was great. >> that was awesome. and the snow was beautiful until i had to drive in it. >> caller: it was awesome. and john fugelsang was great. >> stephanie: yay. >> caller: the hot rumor in the state of michigan if you are not aware, that governor snyder appointed an emergency manager for the city of detroit. so he is going to. they have ten days -- so they have about six days left on it. and the hot rumor from my sister and a few people that work down state is that it's going to be none other than the illustrious rommy. >> stephanie: mitt romney? >> yes. >> step

. >> would a sequester really be on this wavelength regardless of the sequester? very unusual for federal agency to come in and ask for less money. and i think you should be applauded for that. while we recognize that it will have a negative impact, we appreciate the fact that we are working every day to make sure that we are in technology or making an effort to be as efficient as possible. we thank you for that. >> thank you, mr. chairman. once again, thank you for being here. have you heard of the effects of sequestration as a whole? to have particular concerns about this and secondly, with concern about the budget cuts, at what point are we impacted by cutting our budgets so much. in general, can you tell us what you think about the program? >> the chairman of the budget committee has this and we need some detailed answers. >> the officers and probation officers and public defenders are also on the list. i am not sure that it could be if you cut public defender the court has to pay out a private attorney and that will be more we have -- my guess is 100,100,000

the themes later on the wavelength regardless of the sequester.trange, unusual for a federal agent to come ask for less money one year than they did the last year. i think he should be applauded for that. while we recognize an additional 5% cut will have a negative impact, we appreciate the fact it sounds like to me are working every day to make sure whether it's intact now achieve or whether it's in your websites come and make it an effort to be as efficient as you can. we applaud that in thank you for that. mr. serrano. >> thank you, mr. chairman. once again, thank you for being here before us. i know you can't comment on specifics, but have you heard about the effects of the federal judiciary as a whole? we have concerns about the administration of our justice system? and secondly, we're concerned about the budget cuts the federal defenders. at what point are we impacting provisions by cutting their budgets so much? in general, do you think the effect of beyond the courts and on this particular program? >> congressman serrano indicated in remar

to come to justice breyer's point because i think that -- i think he's on a somewhat different wavelength, which is isn't this a mere continuation? shouldn't the fact that we had it before mean, well, let's just try a little bit more until somebody is satisfied that the problem is cured? >> don't change horses. you renew what is in the past -- >> right. >> where it works, as long as the problem isn't solved. ok? >> well, and i think the problem to which the voting rights act was addressed is solved. you look at the registration, you look at the voting. that problem is solved on an absolute as well as a relative basis. so that's like saying if i detect that there is a disease afoot in the population in 1965 and i have a treatment, a radical treatment that may help cure that disease, when it comes to 2005 and i see a new disease or i think the old disease is gone, there is a new one, why not apply the old treatment? >> well, mr. rein -- >> i wouldn't -- >> that is the question, isn't it? you said the problem has been solved. but who gets to make that judgment really? is it you, is it the co

sequester really increase his intensity that, to find savings but it sounds like you're already on the wavelengthregardless of the sequester. it's unusual for an agency to come in and ask for less money one year than they did the last year. i think he should be applauded for the. while we recognize that a sequester, an additional 5% cut would have a negative impact, we appreciate the fact that it sounds to me like you are working every day to make sure whether it's in technology or whether it's in your websites, making an effort to be as efficient as you can. so we applaud that and we thank you for the. mr. serrano? >> thank you, mr. chairman. once again thank you for being here before us. i want to ask you to questions at once. i knew you can't comment on specifics, but have you heard about the effects of sequestration on the federal judiciary as a whole? do you have particular concerns about the administration of our justice system under sequestration? and secondly, with particular concern about the budget cuts to our federal defense, at what point are we safely impacting the provisions of effe