waxman. mr. waxman: good morning, justice barrett. justice barrett: i'd like to return to justice alito's questions to you in which he said that tuition and all of these educational in-kind benefits really are a form of pay. when you answered and you said "it's not pay because the ncaa has defined "pay" as the reasonable and necessary expenses to obtain education." i'm wondering, why does the ncaa get to define what pay is? you know, this is based on experience, but there are certainly plenty of parents and students -- i mean, some people want to play in college for the love of the game. some people think they'll be able to go pro. a lot of people do it because they want to be able to afford college educations or -- or, you know, get the in-kind benefit equal to, say, $30,000 or $40,000 worth of tuition. so why do you get to define what pay is? mr. waxman: the general principle justice barrett, is -- , and i think this is -- this is simply received wisdom for antitrust law purposes -- is producers get to define their product. they get

waxman? mr. waxman: this power does not take away the producer's right to define the product anymore for the ncaa than for the little league, which eight years ago got $80 million for its television contract. there's no argument here that the rule of reason should not be applied. our point is that the rule of reason requires that these restraints be accepted because the product is clearly procompetitive. and the court's decree essentially remakes the procompetitive feature of the product itself. and so justice breyer, this is not an ordinary product or an ordinary market. this is education. in cases like clar's and go far make clear that where actors are not purely economic but also attempting to achieve other purposes, certain rules and restrictions are applied differently than a pure commercial enterprise. and the restraint here you're , worried about technology cases. this is, as the government acknowledges, the rare case in which the challenged restraint is the procompetitive differentiating

waxman: let me respond. there is a healthy debate going on in legislatures around the country over whether college athletes should as a matter of principle be paid. our view, that is not an antitrust question. our own view is if it allowed them to be paid, they would be spending even more time on athletics and bus attention to academics. the ncaa has rules limiting to 35 hours a week the number of hours and applicant spend. this apply to all dig in one -- division i athletes. you say that the schools are making billions of dollars on this. there are 1100 schools that belong to the ncaa. 24 or 25 schools make money on their athletic programs. the rest of the programs are subsidized by general revenue, student fees and tuition. the notion that they graduate at lower rates, and have post outcomes, is contrary to the evidence in this case. justice alito: what you say is true of the thousands and thousands of real student athletes. but what is the graduation rates for football players in the power >> all i can re

with that list will dominate the high end mid price waxman's markets i think sometimes. she associates it for instance with hand being something that's. coming from her and direct it has a specific brand on. because everybody knows that it's more expensive and social instance if you do buy from certain brands when you are sewing sometimes it's a thing to have the board out on the edge of your clothes whereas if it was a cheaper fabric people would cut those companies from asia have also been exporting cheaper fabrics to africa the manufacturers have often been accused of counterfeiting designs by established companies like blue scope on top of that foreign companies have led to the shutdown of many local manufacturers across africa. regard less of where and by whom they are remains african brand fabrics have been used to send a strong pan african message for decades take the best looking for example a loose fitting african shirt often made out of the wax print design popularly known as i'm sure you know so back to our original question is african prints even african when

with that list but dominates the high end mid price waxman's markets i think sometimes. she associates it for instance with having something that's. coming from her and direct it has a specific brand on it. because everybody knows that it's more expensive and social instance if you do buy from certain brands when you are sewing sometimes it's a thing too to have the board out on the edge of your clothes whereas if it was a cheaper fabric people it. companies from asia have also been exporting cheaper fabrics to africa the manufacturers have often been accused of counterfeiting designs by established companies like blue scope on top of that foreign companies have led to the shutdown of many local manufacturers across africa. but regardless of where and by whom they are made the african brand fabrics have been used to send a strong pan african message for decades take the jessica for example a loose fitting african shirt often made out of the wax print design popularly known as i'm sure you know so back to our original question is africa and. it's even african when most fa

on wednesday, the high court heard from and questioned seth waxman, who was representing the nce a in. brought by a group of former college athletes who say current rules violate antitrust law. waxman argued the association is defined by amateur quality meaning student athletes are not paid to play in their questions, both liberal and conservative justices on the court appeared to take issue with wax mons arguments. any trust laws should not be a cover for exploitation of the student athletes. so that is a concern of overarching concern here. theater knee for the former student athletes said players should be rewarded for their hard work and compensation would be life changing. still some justices had concerns about the impact compensation would have and if bigger, more profitable schools would have an advantage to attract the best athletes. like a game of jenga. you've got this nice, solid block that protects the sort of product the schools want to provide. and you pull out one log and then another and everything's fine, then another and another and all of a sudden the whole thing's

joining us right now is olivia waxman, who has written about the situation for "time" magazine and susanirector of the division of child and adolescent psychiatry at the george washington medical center. the woman attacked in times square is an immigrant from the philippines and the philippine foreign secretary went on twitter and said, it's time for people to fight back with their right to bear arms. people are hurting here. what do you think is the way to go? >> yeah, it's extremely sad right now. i think, you know, it's impacting our children quite a bit. we need to talk about racism with our children because they're experiencing it, witnessing it on line and if they don't have the language or framework to understand what's going on, they end up believing something is inherently wrong with them, and they're left feeling alone. if we give kids a language about racist behavior, they have a framework to understand the unfairness. and with that, it builds resistant about, you know, against racial shame, around their identity. they can feel more empowered to be allies and to counter racism

on wednesday, the high court heard from and questioned seth waxman, who was representing the nce a in a case. brought by a group of former college athletes who say current rules violate antitrust law. waxman argued the association is defined by amateur quality, meaning student athletes are not paid to play in their questions, both liberal and conservative justices on the court appeared to take issue with wax mons arguments. any trust laws should not be a cover for exploitation of the student athletes. so that is a concern of overarching concern here. theater knee for the former student athletes said players should be rewarded for their hard work and compensation would be life changing. still some justices had concerns about the impact compensation would have and if bigger, more profitable schools would have an advantage to attract the best athletes. like a game of jenga. you've got this nice, solid block that protects the sort of product the schools want to provide. and you pull af a sudden the whole thing's come comes crashing down. a decision in this case is expected before the end

wooden and uni wax with that little dominates the high end mid price waxman's markets i think sometimes. she associates it for instance with having something that's. coming from her and direct it has a specific brand on it. because everybody knows that it's more expensive and so for instance if you do buy from certain brands when you are sewing sometimes it's a thing to have the boy down on the edge of your clothes whereas if it was a cheaper fabric people would cut the companies from asia have also been exporting cheaper fabrics to africa the manufacturers have often been accused of counterfeiting designs by established companies like blue scope on top of that foreign companies have led to the shutdown of many local manufacturers across africa. but regardless of where and by whom they are made the african brand fabrics have been used to send a strong pan african message for decades take the best looking for example a loose fitting african shirt often made out of the wax print design popularly known as angelina so back to our original question is africa. and even africa when most fabric

kennedy hired lorraine waxman pierce to be the first white house curator. you can see lorraine pierce here on the left. she's pictured accepting an addition to the white house collection. now in 1964 president lyndon b johnson signed in an executive order officially establishing the office of the curator as well as the committee for preservation of the white house which helps to advise on acquisition. let's head to the next slide. now the white house collection has more than 65,000 objects that are stored both on and offsite the early white house collection was mostly comprised of presidential portraiture donated by descendants of presidents or commission by congress. but today the white house collection includes fine arts decorative arts and furniture presidential china services and more. the collection and preservation of art at the white house is far more streamlined today too new additions are made in almost every administration and those are spearheaded by the curators who select paintings and art based on historical and cultural significance. the whit

with that list but dominates the high and mid priced waxman's markets i think sometimes as a. luxury associated for instance with having something that's. coming from holland direct it has a specific brand on it. because everybody knows that it's more expensive and social instance if you do buy from certain brands when you are sewing sometimes it's a thing to have the boy jack on the edge of your clothes whereas if it was a cheaper fabric people would cut the companies from asia have also been exporting cheaper fabrics to africa the manufacturers have often been accused of counterfeiting designs by established companies like blue scope on top of that foreign companies have led to the shutdown of many local manufacturers across africa. but regardless of where and by whom they are made the african brand fabrics have been used to send a strong pan african message for decades take the shaking for example a loose fitting african shirt often made out of the wax print design popularly known as angelina so back to our original question is africa. and even africa when most fabrics are

with that to respond dominates the high and mid price waxman's markets i think sometimes. she associates it for instance with having something that's. coming from her and direct it has a specific brand on it. because everybody knows that it's more expensive and social instance if you do buy from certain brands when you are sewing sometimes it's a thing to have the board out on the edge of your clothes whereas if it was a cheaper fabric people would cut the companies from asia have also been exporting cheaper fabrics to africa the manufacturers have often been accused of counterfeiting designs by established companies like blue scope on top of that foreign companies have led to the shutdown of many local manufacturers across africa. but regardless of where and by whom they are made the african brand fabrics have been used to send a strong pan african message for decades take the best sicking for example a loose fitting african shirt often made out of the wax print design popularly known as angelina so back to our original question is africa. and even african when most fabri

samuel alito lawyer, former bill clinton solicitor general seth waxman whether educational benefits constitutencaa argument is that consumers love watching unpaid people play sports. this is not so much about the ncaa but earning money from the likeness, personal appeal. let's face it the ncaa is raking in millions and coaches are raking in millions but the players are not supposed to earn a baloney sandwich because they have a scholarship. conservatives take the position that college degree is no longer worth the expense. i think it is nuts and hypocritical, that college is too expensive and overrated for everyone except for the folks whose skills are making everyone else in the organization rich. there was a time conservatives said businesses are allowed to make their own decisions. if the decisions make decisions like publishing a certain book, or plastic toy features, some conservatives are calling for boycotts. everyone should be concerned how outrageous the cancel culture has become, but there was a time when conserve i have its would have defended the right for the companies to make tho

the industry of course opposed the waxman-markey climate bill. they have denied the simple fact that fossil fuels is the largest contributor to climate change. despite the ad campaign, everyone knows that fossil fuels create greenhouse gas emissions. and the fossil fuel subsidies are outdated and need to go. oil change international found the expenditure cost $2.3 billion annually just for the tax deduction on intangible drilling cost. the tax deduction for the percentage depletion which started in 1926 cost $1.3 billion an cruelly. we need to make sure we start to eliminate these. we will hear testimony from tara and jill, both inspirational people, about how fossil fuel production has affected their communities. that's the impact it's having on real people. vice chair tlaib always makes it personal. this is leading to excessive pollution in communities. they'll testify about the impact it's having on them and their neighbors and their families. we will also hear testimony from greta thunberg, the world famous climate activist about how spending

the industry opposed the waxman climate they have denied the fact that fossil fuels are the largest contributor, everyone knows that fossil fuel creates green house gas emissions and the fossil fuel subsidies are outdated and need to go. oil change international found this expenditure $2.3 billion annually for the tax deduction on drilling costs. the tax deduction for depletion costs $1.3 billion annually. we need to make sure we start to eliminate these. we will hear testimony from tara houseka and jill hunkler about how fossil fuel production pollution has affected their communities and that's the impact it's having on real people. always makes it personal, this is actually leading to excessive pollution in communities and they'll testify about the impact it's having on them and their neighbors and their families. the -- we will also hear testimony from greta thunberg, the world famous climate activist about how ending fossil fuel subsidies are absolutely essential to the leadership in the world. that it matters that we have these fossil fuel subsidies eliminated in our infrastructure plan no