what was henry waxman's goal in 1994? i think he was really trying to showcase the latest findings to the food and drug administration and that tobacco industries would deliver only manipulating nicotine in cigarets to increase addiction to them, that they were doing, that they were doing it knowingly, that they knew tobacco had health hazards, that they were marketing to children, and they were just trying to deny the facts about what was going on in that industry. well, let's go back to the hearing. these are the seven tobacco ceos and their interactions with the members of the committee. do you or those of you have asked your company to object to appearing before this subcommittee under oath? if not, i'd like you to rise. and those who will be testifying as well with you to rise. if you raise your right hand. do you swear that the testimony you're about to give is the truth? the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? i do. but please consider yourself to be under oath. let me ask you first. i'd like to just go down th

what was henry waxman's goal in 1994? i think he was really trying to showcase the latest findings to the food and drug administration and that tobacco industries would deliver only manipulating nicotine in cigarets to increase addiction to them, that they were doing, that they were doing it knowingly, that they knew tobacco had health hazards, that they were marketing to children, and they were just ting to deny the facts about what was going on in that industry. well, let's go back to the hearing. these are the seven tobacco ceos and their interactions with the members of the committee. do you or those of you have asked your company to object to appearing before this subcommittee under oath? if not, i'd like you to rise. and those who will be testifying as well with you to rise. if you raise your right hand. do you swear that the testimony you're about to give is the truth? the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? i do. but please consider yourself to be under oath. let me ask you first. i'd like to just go down the

that is dev waxman. joining us live from los angeles. the united nations commission has found as various policies that responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity in gaza. the reports has life on events since i'm off to attack on israel . on october, the 7th on different medic editor james base reports from the un human rights council in geneva. this is the most comprehensive view and report yes on what's happened since october the 7th. the commission of inquiry, chet bye, the former high commission of human rights. now they play says how much carried out will crimes on that day. but that does not justify israel's most frequent correspondence. that is where they are told her teeth are responsible for war crimes. crimes against humanity and violations of international humanitarian and human rights law, including extermination, intentionally directing attacks against civilians and civilian objects. mother all will for killing using salvation as a method of war. pile of stones, ambassador said the reports findings are clearly dem

joining us live now is san francisco chronicle reporter laura waxman. laura, thanks for being with us. >> hi, stephanie. thank you. >> so we know the progression wouldn't happen overnight, but the latest data shows it could take nearly two decades. >> yeah. so as you mentioned, this is the question that we always get right. how long is the recovery going to take. and so this brokerage sun-young put out some new data based on past leasing trends for the city for the ten years leading up to covid and that way, they've calculated how long it might take. and they're saying it could be up to 18 years. >> wow. and to put that in context, your reporting highlighted the gravity of that time frame. 18 years ago, steve jobs was still a year away from announcing the first iphone. uber wasn't even here yet. let that sink in for our viewers. so how was that figure calculated? >> right. so that's hard to believe, right? 18 years. it's a long time. and that is the caveat is that's the worst case scenario. so that would be taking the average leasing volume that we've s

to truly thank laura waxman especially for productive and collaborative partnership and continuing toonvene us to build trust and making sure we build open lines of comthank you for your with the task force and for being great partners. i will address some of the recentnn had , both the increased enforcement s. let's talk a little bit about some of the paths we have had and how those are working. we will speak a little bit to our receiving cities work we have done there with cities in the interior. some of my colleagues here can speak more falsely. this past aware, the ■■administration took a big step to demonstrate its commitment to family you -- family unity, announcing some nonresidents to stay to pursue their green cards. step by limiting this hardship and we think it will have a big impact. not everyone will be eligie. y affects those who have been residing in the.s. since june 17 and have been in the country for at least the past 10 years. ■i7% are eligible have been in the country for over 23 years. ' right thing to do so we anticipate this measure could benefit approximately 5

international humanitarian know deliberately targeting civilians. dots court rejected the case of waxman is a professor of israel studies at the university of california in los angeles. he says, guns resignation increases pressure on less. and you know, to cool any elections as kansas party, the national unity potty wasn't positive. and this and yahoo's original governing covered issue. so that coalition, which still has a slight majority in the parliament, hold $64.00 seats and out of the $120.00. and this was the problem that us did in case that still intact. and as long as that television holds together, nothing all can, you can remain in office, but it does increase the pressure. now i think on this and you all have to cool early elections of gas is presence in this government. gave it some domestic legitimacy. this was the government that was deeply unpopular, even before october. the southern, the gaps is entry to the government come to stabilize. the government gave it some domestic legitimacy without guidance and his is puddles. and the government, the government will lose that d

on medicaid congress staffer, executive branch outside scholar, working on -- you think of henry waxmanll over the building with and another lawyer to talk about this from a different perspective, andy schneider. >> good morning. thank you tom, thank you for inviting me. i'm gonna be brief. i want to spend a minute explaining to you that the sub patrolling in families where i work is nonpartisan policy and research center. i'm sorry. you are talking to somebody who's colorblind. at the research center our mission is to make sure that children and their families have affordable healthcare coverage. making sure low come families are eligible for medicaid or chip, but they are enrolled and the programs work. you can see where this is going, i'm sure find benefit by, we have an issue here. i do like the paper and to talk to the medicaid expansion issue is that it recognizes there is have these 10 holdouts states that in helping out for a while and leaving a lot of people dangling in the wind uninsured. so we do need to account for that i appreciate the commentators to figure out ways to imp

extensive e focusing on medicaid congress staffer, executive branch outside scholar you think of henry waxmanhas the medicaid program ation is work with them. more recently working with organizations for children research on that and lawyer to talk about little different perspective, andy schneider. >> good morning. thank you tom thank you for inviting me. i'm going to be to just spend a minute explaining to you that the center for children and families where i work is nonpartisanpolicy and research center at the public policy at georgetown university and -- >> i'm sorry. >> yea >> you're talking somebody that is color blind. >> there we g all of the information that everybody needs. >> that's good, okay. our mission is basically that children in the families havev affordable high-quality healthcare coverage and that means mostlile making sure that if low-income families arele for medicaid or chip, the child health insurance program they are enrolled and that the programs see where this is going, sort of defined benefit guy. defined contribution guy so we have an issue here. what i do like a