chief of the "new york daily news," which is waging a kind of crusade on this, today they labeled wayne lapierreyne. let me make the argument that the nra makes and a lot of civil libertarians say, that this list is a nonsense constitutional disaster. there's a huge amount of people on it and we're not going to tell these people they can't enjoy other constitutionally protected rights like you can't worship at the place you want to worship or speak or vote. so why should we take their guns away? >> 100% legitimate argument if it were coming from anyone other than the nra. it's convenient for the nra to jump onto that as a defense of what is seemingly otherwise a ridiculous stance. 2,000 terror suspects, right? have allegedly purchased weapons over the past roughly ten years. if only 2% of those or so, let's say 1%, were actually legitimate terrorists and they had the intent to carry out an act like we saw in paris, well, you're talking about 20 or so people, and that's more than enough. the nra has roughly 5 million members, which again comes out to about 2% of our entire country's population. i