transit center yutilities, thi is shown as zero because webcor continues to pay the bills.k maintenance and programming, this is also being shown as zero because we are not continuing to incur bills. digital content and way finding, this category is left intact because pearl's work remains uninhabited. marketing and leasing commissions, no change is shown here because the -- the leasing continues, and it -- it's not impacted by the closure. asset management fee and administration, this is a cost category that contains lincoln's management fee, staff compensation, other miscellaneous office expense does. and note that lincoln took over the temporary management of the terminal without an increase in their fee. also included in this is net experts and legal. security, this category is entirely made up of labor with construction related to the decrease activitied. then finally on revenue, we're showing it as an annual amount. on the revenue side, these are the budget amounts that we are conservatively assuming will not be realized. for b.r.v. just prior to the center opening, r

lawsuit that we will be seeking compensation for ultimately from the designers or for webcor? >> i think it's a little premature to assume that kind of as a baseline? obviously, we'll be uncovering what transpired in that respect in terms of the design. this is just really focused on the fact that it's protracted out to deal with closeout, the temporary terminal, as well as, you know, modifying or recalibrating the staffing plan to address the lawsuit, wherever it may take us and reflective of that new forecast of staffing with the institutional knowledge that we had. back at amendment four, we had to add a little dollars, and we are already starting kind of to destaff a bit and were on our downward wind. for myself, i was starting to focus a little more on public works, and with the events of september compounded by the lawsuit, we realized our staff forecast needs to be recalibrated. >> this agency, through your contracts, through your services, otherwise, are incurring costs because of the lawsuit, because of the issues with the new center. and i thought i read in the staff

also, we gave webcor, we gave them directions to start closing up some of the areas. we had 30 feet opened, and now that we know that it's 14 feet long, 7 feet wide, we're going to start putting that back in so we can gain some time on the back end so we don't have to wait and do the fix and then put it all back. and then, of course, the peer review, the verification, that's related to the brittle verification analysis. we brought on ruby and associations on december 17, and that's going to be ongoing working with the team and ruby associates getting to creating that list, and if any additional remediation has to be done, it'll be determined here, and we'll report on that on february , and then, the actual mitigation itself would happen at some point once we start getting data out of that review. so that's what's happened regarding the peer review panel. now, i will turn it over to ron to continue with what's going on on the rest of the facility. >> thank you, dennis, good morning, directors. i'm here to give the other half of this presentation, which is focused on fa

it's really a pass or subcontractor claim through webcor to the city. the city had moved for summary judgment, dismissing it, feel that the judge would not award that summary judgment. the trial started. there's yet the possibility that the claim will settle short of continuing with the trial. that is to be seen. do i have that right joe? >> you're right. >> they're up to date. i'll continue to stay in touch with elaine o'neil and if there are updates i will report them next meeting or subsequent meetings. >> now i want to ask chief rivera and any other client departments here -- do you feel in the program is meeting your expectations and what youen the expectations of the voters were? >> good morning everyone. my name is assistant deputy chief tony rivera with the san francisco fire department. to answer your question, yes, it is -- dpw and this bond america is goin--measure will meet the . in 1997, san francisco fire department actually merged or took over the ambulance portion of d.p.h. we brought them under our wing. we cross-trained our paramedics