maybe they could then use three strokes of a pen to redact the name, as well as webzilla.hey obviously were doctored some other names but for some reason, they decided not to scare my client. >> tucker: their position is, we have interviewed the editor of buzzfeed, i think their position is, we are not endorsing this, or ratifying the conclusion is document, we are putting them out there for the public to decide. does not indemnify them against suits like yours? it is not their story. >> it does not. in fact, the way defamation law works, if you repeat something that is defamatory, you now own that statement. by publishing match -- i have to point out, they were the first one to publish it, clearly, these documents were in the possession of various news organizations for weeks. yet, no one published it. this is one of those rare situations where msnbc, cnn, and fox, all agree on something, and they agree that this document should not have been published. it was irresponsible. >> tucker: the details, i think cnn went with an overview but they didn't go with the details. wha