as weic that break, want to give you this phone number if you want to call for help -- 301-952-5370.ey's office and get more information about family strong experience and how it can help your family. we'll be right back. >>> welcome back. at the event that we're discussing that will take place on october 17th, the family strong experience, you're going to have some strong men there. and one of them is a former nfl hall of famer, charles haley, who's going to talk about some of the mental health issues that he struggled with. why did you choose him? >> charles haley has a wonderful story that we think people ought to hear. he's an nfl player, he's a hall of famer, he's the only player to have five rings. yet, what he will say is that he suffered for many years with a mental health condition that played itself out on the field -- anger, aggression, poor behavior. and he wishes he had gotten help sooner. when he did seek help, he found that he was able to change his life. he actually was admitted to the hall of fame in 2015, but believed that he would have been able to do so sooner. me

would recognize that we are limiting sequestration, that the money that we add is dollar for dollar so weic and defense, build our defense and invest in the strength of our country in terms of our domestic agenda. this would all be completed in a timely fashion for the next year. as we aree time planning the offsets to the top line, the committees would be will in terms of the appropriations committee doing their appropriations. it is a question of what the dollar figure would be, and is set up -- and that's a big question. >> isn't this a big distraction? it's more than a distraction. the fact is that that's one element of this. the presence of the united states will sign the bill, so president of the united states will sign the bill, so that's leverage is significant. that leverage is significant. different things in the press. approachesferent including bringing to bills to the floor on which is fine, as long as one is a clean cr. until the end of the fiscal year, there isn't a great deal of play. it is what comes after that. you see, i want to have it top line by the time we do the cr.

within modern economics is a -- weic mathematics need to go back to a more static social analysis within analysis. is that what we need to see? a defeat of the modern massiveness in every central bank. bill: almost all central banks are fixated on the past 35 years, 40 years since we went off the gold standard and credit began to expand like gangbusters. they view the debt cycle in terms of the short-term cycle. they have no sense about longer-term debt expansion and the ultimate cap or ultimate limit on that debt. when you inject educational limits, that's a tough one for a fed, a tough one for phd's coming out of graduate school. curve,ely, the phillips the taylor rule, no. nobody knows what the new neutral rate should be. they should be looking at cycles. we hear much of this from gary stern out of washington university and rice university. a totally different take. mike: what do you do now? do you look to those troubled countries that janet yellen was talking about as opportunities or concerns? bill: a few of them. i have had a favorite in mexico. mexico is on the cover of the econom

weic don't know how this tension within iran will work out. but i think if we reject this agreement, we will lose this opportunity with the people of iran.. if we back out of a deal that we have agreed to, we will only embolden the hard-liners who insist that america can not be trusted and we will be doing self-inflicted damage to american global leadership and of international diplomacy. once more, the alternatives that i have heard run the gamut fromo unrealistic to horrifying. for example, some say that should the senate reject this agreement we would be in a position to negotiate a better one. but i have spoken to the ambassadors or deputy chiefs ofa mission of each of the five nations who helped broker the deal with us and they all agree that this simply would not be the case. instead these diplomats havema able to come back to the bargaining table at all, and that the sanctions regimes would likely erode or just fall apart completely. giving iran's leaders more money and more leverage and diminishing both our moral authority throughout t