$2 million worth of benefit value and i'll take that little amount of up zoning and look at what weiener's doing across the state. >> sfns -- san francisco is a unique city and fragile. and the neighborhoods that make up san francisco and they're fragile. to reduce our carbon footprint is in housing. we request the board stop playing politics with the planet's future. in this we see no amendments to make this better. why don't we support the more homes acts. it results in below market rate housing in san francisco and over ways to improve be part of the solution. last one area i was really thrilled to see the sponsor recognize was our racist history of single family home zonings. i ask how we can move forward to remove that black mark from our laws. thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> i support your bill. your motion. i remember this is a new way of forming redevelopment. i remember the fillmore tours where 300 to 400 people were chased out. imminent domain of african-american, jewish and japanese. sp50 is the same thing they did at fillmore towers which is all market right now, 90%. i

$2 million worth of benefit value and i'll take that little amount of up zoning and look at what weiener's doing across the state. >> sfns -- san francisco is a unique city and fragile. and the neighborhoods that make up san francisco and they're fragile.

i have not taken a final position but i'm urging supervisor weiener to include te amendments but i will not support it as written today but am supportive of moving it forward and i appreciate supervisor mar moving it

i have not taken a final position but i'm urging supervisor weiener to include te amendments but i will not support it as written today but am supportive of moving it forward and i appreciate supervisor mar moving it forward in an aggressive manner. thank you, supervisor brown for your amendment. supervisor ronen. >> commissioner: supervisor haney. >> thank you for bringing this forward. i think one of the things and i'm sure supervisor mar will respond to this but with respect to the amendment, why we would be required to send it back to committee and what the goal of that would be. it seems like there was a pretty robust conversation in committee on this legislation and this resolution. i think i get as all of us, i received a lot of communication about s.b.50. and this resolution and i take a particular position around it related to my role as the supervisor of the district that really has been building most of the housing for the city. and for me as the supervisor of that area and my constituents we want to see greater housing production across the city. one think i heard in the con