, which is open at the pushkin state museum of fine arts, but before we talk about weisberg’s paintingsbefore we look at the paintings belonging to his career, i would still like to raise an issue related to his biography, for me as a professional. biographers, this is very interesting, because i honestly admit, i knew little about this artist, but when i began to prepare to look at some materials, i was of course amazed by his fate, by the way, do you know if there really is a biography of him, a description of his life, but he has a short autobiography written by himself, one sheet in size, a4 everything, everything, everything, a fundamental monograph was not written by anna yurina chudetskaya , which was published in 2018, and this is the most detailed biography of weisberg, an analysis of his work, you can turn to them like an encyclopedia and everything will be found there. so, look, he was born in 1924, in the family of a soviet freudian. yes, his father was a psychologist, teacher, follower of freud in the soviet union, yes, he tried to somehow propagate these ideas, and apparen

well, before we talk about weisberg’s paintings, before we look at the paintings belonging to his worksesting to me as a professional biographer, because i honestly admit, i knew little about this artist, so when i began to prepare to look at some materials, of course i his fate struck him, by the way, do you know if there really is some kind of biography of him, a description of his life? and he has a short autobiography, written by himself , one sheet of paper in size, that’s all. he was born in 1924 into a soviet family freudian, yes, his father was a psychologist, teacher, follower of freud in the soviet union, yes, he tried to somehow propagate these ideas, and apparently, on the fate of the child. it had an effect, this is what i read about him, tell me, is it true or not, that in 1936, when the war began in spain, a twelve-year-old boy runs away to this war, he is caught almost somewhere in odessa, this is true ? yes, yes, it is true, this is actually a rather tragic story, because this was the very period, adolescence, when it manifested itself mental illness, and this happened

. >> a second menendez trial began eight days after oj's acquittal with the judge weisberg presiding weisberg made was no tv camera. >> this time, one jury for both brothers. the judge scaled-back testimony about the brother's the legit physical and sexual abuse. diane was able to testify but not about lyle telling her his father was molesting her. the reason was because this time around lyle did not take the stand to lay the foundation about abuse in the first place. >> in between the trials, there were allegations he was asking people to fabricate testimony. >> letters surfaced after the first trial which lyle was alleged to have encourage people to lie for the defense. >> the defense decided they could not put him on the witness stand so erik had to carry the ball for both brothers. he was a good witness but not as strong as lyle had been at the first trial. >> the expert testimony about the impact of the alleged abuse and the brothers state of mind, the judge severely limited the number of experts because he felt that testimony was repetitive. one not allowed to testify was dr. v