host: wendy parmet.: and potentially depends on other things, what the court rules and how it rules. the court, i hope it uploads at the mandates, but the court could overturn them narrowly, for example on procedural grounds. or it could make broader arguments about the scope of authority and liberty that we are hearing. if it does that, i think it absolutely -- i think that decision absolutely would -- i'm trying to say it creates an invitation to begin to contest lots of laws and accepted measures. other osha laws, other cms laws. why should nursing home employees have to be trained on infections. and you mentioned marriage testing. what about tuberculosis testing for jobs? what about school mandates, the laws requiring children to have the polio vaccine? i could go on for a long time and list all of the measures. that will be challenged. it's not -- let me add, it is not just the federal measures. if the court uses the kind of reasoning daniel is arguing, and we have seen it in some of the lower court